City of Joburg housing policy unconstitutional – Supreme Court

2011-03-30 14:23

The City of Johannesburg’s housing policy in relation to 100 poor people living in rundown buildings in Berea was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court of Appeal held today.

The court held that the policy was unconstitutional to the extent that it excluded the occupiers from consideration for temporary emergency accommodation.

The Bloemfontein court confirmed a high court order in which the City of Johannesburg was obliged to provide the occupiers, whose names appear on a list, with temporary emergency accommodation.

This accommodation should be as close as possible to the Berea properties, provided that the occupiers were still resident at the properties, belonging to Blue Moonlight Properties.

The city appealed the high court decision to the Supreme Court of Appeal on the basis that it was only obliged to provide accommodation to people it evicts from properties it considers unsafe.

The building owners joined the city as a party to the court proceedings in the high court after they had served its application for eviction on the occupiers.

However, they opposed this saying they could not be evicted until the City of Johannesburg discharged its constitutional obligation to provide them with temporary alternative accommodation.

An attorney at the Socio-Economic Rights Institute of South Africa, Teboho Mosikili, said the “powerful” judgment by the Supreme Court of Appeal on the matter was a ground-breaking decision.

“It confirms that the city was under a direct duty to alleviate the plight of the desperately poor and homeless,” said Mosikili in a statement.

The Socio-Economic Rights Institute of South Africa said the city’s irrational attempts to evade its duties have been comprehensively dealt with.

The institute hopes that the city would respect the decision and implement the court’s decision soon.

The matter started when the group of desperately poor people living in a disused commercial property in Berea were sued for eviction by the owner in 2006.

The occupiers were represented in court by, among others, the Socio-Economic Rights Institute of South Africa’s director of litigation, Stuart Wilson.

The Centre for Applied Legal Studies Litigation Unit at the Wits Law Clinic were the attorneys.

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

 
/News

Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.