Is Oscar Pistorius raising a new defence?

2014-05-14 11:31

Judge Thokozile Masipa has ruled that there are valid doubts about what Oscar Pistorius’ legal defence is.

The athlete’s legal team today lost what Masipa called a “strange” bid to prevent the athlete from being referred to a state mental institution for observation.

Masipa ruled there was a possibility that Pistorius may have generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) and that this, coupled with his physical vulnerability, could affect whether he was criminally responsible for his actions on the night he had killed Reeva Steenkamp.

She said a more thorough report “would reveal ... that at the time the alleged crime was committed, the accused suffered from a mental disorder, which could have resulted in his not being criminally responsible for his act”.

The order came after the defence called a forensic psychiatrist, Professor Merryll Vorster, who testified that Pistorius suffered from GAD, which could affect “his ability to act in accordance with an appreciation of the difference between right and wrong”.

Masipa ruled that Vorster had unwittingly created doubt about what Pistorius’ defence was.

“A doubt has been created that the accused may possibly have another defence relating to his criminal responsibility.”

This is in line with an argument made by state prosecutor Gerrie Nel, who yesterday said in his application for Pistorius to be referred that the defence was trying to introduce another defence because Pistorius had been a poor witness.

He also said there was already confusion over whether Pistorius’ defence was still putative self-defence, or whether it was now automatism, related to the fact that Pistorius had said the shooting was an accident.

Masipa ruled that “the accused may not have raised the issue that he was not criminally responsible in so many words, but evidence led on his behalf clearly raises the issue and it cannot be ignored.”

The judge ruled that a period of mental observation would ensure Pistorius had a fair trial and also mentioned that she found it “strange” that the defence had opposed state prosecutor Gerrie Nel’s application.

Pistorius will now face a thirty-day evaluation period, but will likely not be required to stay overnight at a mental hospital.

Barry Roux, Pistorius’ advocate, asked that Pistorius’ observation be conducted on an out-patient basis, something to which Masipa lent her support.

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

 
/News

Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
Traffic
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.