Pistorius’ sentence unreasonable – Nel

2014-11-04 18:01

The five-year jail sentence imposed on paralympian Oscar Pistorius is “shockingly light and inappropriate”, the State says in court papers filed today.

“Not enough emphasis was placed on the horrendous manner in which the deceased died coupled with the gruesome injuries she sustained when the accused shot and killed her,” said prosecutors Gerrie Nel and Andrea Johnson.

The State filed its application for leave to appeal against Judge Thokozile Masipa’s conviction and sentence today.

The jail term would not have been imposed by any reasonable court, they argue.

“The sentence imposed is shockingly inappropriate for the accused that armed him[self], with the intention to shoot, walked to the bathroom and fired four shots, knowing that there was a human being behind the door of the toilet.

“We will argue that the sentence is inappropriate and shockingly light for someone that killed an innocent person with gross negligence where his conduct bordered on dolus eventualis [legal intent].”

Pistorius was jailed for five years for the culpable homicide of his girlfriend, law graduate and model Steenkamp. He shot her dead through the locked toilet door in his Pretoria home on February 14 last year.

For discharging a firearm at Tasha’s restaurant in Sandton, Johannesburg, in January 2013, he was sentenced to three years in jail, suspended for five years. The sentences would run concurrently, Masipa ruled in the High Court in Pretoria on October 21.

The State argued that Masipa erred in overemphasising Pistorius’s personal circumstances, in not taking into account the consequences of his actions, and in overemphasising the purpose of “rehabilitation and reformation at the cost of retribution”.

The application for leave to appeal against the culpable homicide conviction was based on “questions of law”.

The State said the question should be posed whether the court correctly applied the legal principles related to circumstantial evidence, and the principle of dolus eventualis to the facts of the case.

It questioned how the court dealt with Pistorius’ numerous defences.

“The question should respectfully be reserved if a court should trawl through a ‘plethora of defences’ and pick one for the accused, or should the court have rejected his evidence on the finding that he was untruthful and had more than one defence,” the application reads.

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24


Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.