Point counter point

2011-10-01 10:30

Some discussion has been generated by my assertion at the recent parliamentary indaba on the media that I did not “feel” black editors in public discourse or the media agenda.

Reaction to my statement suggested that I had been patronising and/or racist in my ­observation – none of which is the case.

My point of departure was simply the expectations I have of black editors, whose emergence and validation I commend and respect.

Many news organisations now boast more black writers and editors than during apartheid, when such writers and then potential editors felt their world views or political orientation was not accommodated in newsrooms or editorial decision-making forums.

But now, on the eve of 20 years of democracy in a country led by a government with a clear mandate, it is odd that the media agenda appears out of kilter with the popular experience.

This is despite the meteoric rise in the number of black print editors from a paltry 7% in 1994 to a surprising 65% this year.

I argue very strongly that this commendable rise in the number of black editors is not commensurate with the expected diversity of opinion.

It feels at times that the championing of progressive causes is labelled by the media as divisive.

Or is it a case of assimilation?

One is therefore not generalising that all black writers or editors are not progressive, but the expectation that a new political dispensation would provide an outlet for previously unheard voices and viewpoints appears to have been disappointed.

It is not needless to reiterate President Jacob Zuma and others’ repeated assurances that this government fundamentally supports freedom of expression – a freedom that many in power today, in fact, fought to establish.

The fact is that those who lead the current government do not stand outside the historical tradition of freedom of expression.

In many instances, they are that tradition.Government is clear that the role of the democratic watchdog is welcome as one of the checks and balances that is as entrenched and as authentic in our democracy as in long-established systems elsewhere.

One would have expected by now that the impact of black writers and editors would be felt in the form of a greater diversity of voices than we have at present.

In fact, the last time a new voice was established in the form of The New Age, it was shouted down.

“We don’t mind diverse, just not this diverse!” clamoured champions of the supposedly free market.

In spite of the promise of diverse commentary and a greater understanding of the diversity of cultural practices in our richly textured society, scorn and sarcasm is poured on cultural conventions that are near and dear to the majority.

Where is the diversity of voices – in a country where “working together” is our national call to action – when the labour movement is regularly vilified by the media as inflexible and a threat to economic growth, effectively positioning the working class (who also happen to follow the media) as public enemy number one?

Where was the diversity of voice when the African Union developed a roadmap for Libya and held this line while military solutions were sought in other quarters?

Where is the diversity of voices when a public health system that serves nearly 90% of South Africans is due for an upgrade to a national health insurance scheme and the plan is roundly shot down?

Black editors or at least their parents and relatives would no doubt know the challenges facing many of our public hospitals and the less-than-optimum and sometimes undignified experiences our people have in those ­centres – a project this government has been trying to resolve since its inception.

These instances are part of a pattern of belief and argument that posits that we have merely a veneer of integrity, that our democracy is a sham and that all of this is about to fall apart around us.

It is also a way of saying to the vast majority of citizens that they got it wrong each time they stepped into the voting booth.

We cannot expect to build a dignified, proud and prosperous nation by second-guessing ourselves.

Our Constitution issues many calls to action and implores the realisation of many complementary rights, including freedom of thought, expression and citizens’ access to information.

All these rights are there to claim in the interests of building an equitable and just South ­Africa.

The media agenda – whether crafted by white or black editors – should be seen to respond to the constitutional vision in all its facets.

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

 
/News

Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.