Shock, awe in the garden of good and evil

2012-07-28 08:49

When the chaos of the hood intrudes on the security of suburbia, a moment of collective cognitive dissonance occurs, writes Gary Younge


The only thing more predictable than a mass shooting in the US is the alacrity with which the nation’s political class will declare itself shocked and the media class – which has well-rehearsed contingencies for just such occasions – will faithfully transmit and amplify that shock to the nation.

“America leads the world in shocks,” noted the late singer Gil Scott-Heron in We Beg Your Pardon.

“Unfortunately, America does not lead the world in deciphering the cause of shock.”

And so it was that when the news emerged that a lone gunman had sprayed a cinema with gunfire in Aurora, the incident was described as “unimaginable”, “incredible” and “unfathomable.”

However else one would describe events in Colorado in the early hours of that Friday morning, they were hardly unimaginable.

Columbine is less than a 40-minute drive away.

Just a few days earlier, a man shot up a bar in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, wounding 17 people.

While Aurora’s tragedy was certainly abhorrent, it was by no means aberrant.

For the injured and bereaved such shootings are harrowing and startling.

But although the venue, timing and scale of these tragedies may differ along with their dramatic idiosyncrasies – trench coats in Columbine, Batman in Aurora, Tea Party talking points in Tucson – the fact they will happen is a wretched yet constant feature of American life.

Nor does it take any great powers of analysis to work out why they happen.

There are roughly 90 guns for every 100 people in the US (by far the highest concentration in the world, with Yemen a distant second at 55), and roughly 85 people are killed by guns here every day.

Those two facts are not necessarily causally linked.

Incidences of hypothermia and burst water pipes both rise in the winter.

They’re connected by the season.

But that doesn’t mean people come down with hypothermia because of burst water pipes or pipes burst
as a result of people’s deteriorating health.

Similarly, access to guns does not, by itself, lead to gun crime.

Sweden, Finland and Switzerland are also in the top 10 for gun ownership per capita, but none of them have a high rate of gun homicides.

So while it is certainly true that more guns increase the possibility of mass shootings (James Holmes bought his arsenal legally – had it been more difficult, his rampage might have been checked), they don’t by themselves increase the likelihood.

What links the US’ high concentration of guns and relatively high level of gun deaths are the country’s high levels of inequality, segregation and poverty.

For in countries with at least two of those features – South Africa, Honduras, El Salvador, Jamaica, Guatemala – you will find higher levels of gun deaths.

There are many poor, unequal and segregated countries that don’t have a big problem with gun violence; and there are many countries with lots of guns that do not have a big problem with gun violence.

But the US is the only place in the Western world that has both rampant inequality and ample access to guns.

Add to that a healthcare system in which large numbers of people are deprived of the mental health facilities they need, and you have laboratory conditions for sustained outbreaks of social violence involving guns.

The precise series of events, rationalisations and explanations for how each person makes the decision to go out and shoot one or several people is particular to the person, time and place.

But the notion that all these incidents are not part of a pattern is untenable.

When large numbers of guns are available in a society with huge inequalities, the likelihood is a lot of people are going to get shot.

There is nothing inevitable about this.

Polls show a narrow majority believes both gun laws and laws covering the sale of firearms should be stricter.

That support has ebbed in recent years and lacks electoral expression and political capacity.

But given that mainstream politicians have abandoned the cause, the constituency remains remarkably robust.

What is lacking are leaders prepared to mobilise those numbers at the ballot box to confront the financial and lobbying might of the National Rifle Association.

So given the regularity and predictability of these calamities, why the recurrent shock?

It seems that assumptions about the perpetrators of gun violence, their motivations and their victims are in constant need of being reset.

If Holmes had been Muslim, we would now be talking about radical Islam; if he was undocumented, we would be talking about electrifying a 2 000-mile fence; if he was black, we’d be talking about the consequences of affirmative action in PhD programmes.

But in the absence of a sweeping and unfounded anxiety about white people or a political conversation about gun control or inequality, we end up talking about good and evil.

Without context, these things truly are unfathomabl.e

Moreover, there are some places in the US where you are supposed to be safe – malls, suburban schools, cinemas – and there are other places where people are expected to be vulnerable: poor black and Latino neighbourhoods.

The possibility of arbitrary death, like systemic incarceration, is just understood to be the price you pay for being black or Latino in the US.

On the night after the shooting in Aurora, 22 people were shot, three fatally, in Chicago.

But when the chaos of the ‘hood intrudes on the security of suburbia, a moment of collective cognitive dissonance occurs.

The shock resides not in the fact that a large number of people have been killed by a gunman – that happens every night – but that every now and then, the wrong people have died in the wrong place.

»Younge is the New York correspondent for the Guardian and author of No Place Like Home: A Black Briton’s Journey Through the Deep South (Mississippi) and Stranger in a Strange Land: Travels in the Disunited States


Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

 
/News

Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.