The age of man need not be a disaster

2011-12-10 09:33

Scientists interested in drawing attention to the human transformation of planet Earth have begun calling the current geological epoch the Anthropocene – the age of man.Naming an epoch is serious business and, in this case, the new name is well deserved, given humanity’s enormous alteration to Earth.

We have acidified the oceans and changed the global climate with our use of fossil fuels. We have subjected more than 75% of the ice-free land on Earth to our will.

We have built so many dams that half of the world’s river flow is regulated, stored or impeded by human-made structures. We have transported plants and animals hither and yon as crops and livestock, and as accidental stowaways.

Some environmentalists see the Anthropocene as a disaster by definition since they see all human changes as a threat to a pristine Eden.

If your definition demands that nature be completely untouched by humans, there is indeed no nature left.But humans have been changing ecosystems for millenniums. We have learned that ecosystems are not – and have never been – static entities.

The notion of a virgin, pristine wilderness was understandable in the days of Captain Cook, but since the emergence of modern ecology and archaeology, it has been systematically dismantled by empirical evidence.

But even scientists are misled by the idea of an untouched, natural paradise.

A paper published in October by a group of scientists at the University of California, Davis, in the journal Conservation Biology criticises the idea of the Anthropocene because it leaves “the impression that nowhere on Earth is natural” and because “the concept of pervasive human-caused change may cultivate hopelessness in those dedicated to conservation and may even be an impetus for accelerated changes in land use motivated by profit”.

We defend the term Anthropocene and we do not accept the argument that the concept opens the floodgates to unrestricted development. To assert that without the ideal of pristine wilderness humanity will inevitably go on ruining our best-loved landscapes is analogous to Dostoevsky’s dictum that without God, everything is permitted.

Yes, we live in the Anthropocene, but that does not mean we inhabit an ecological hell. Our management and care of natural places and the millions of other species with which we share the planet could and should be improved.

But we must do far more, the scientists suggest in their article, than just hold back the tide of change, and build higher and stronger fences around the Arctic, the Himalayas and the other “relatively intact ecosystems”.

We can accept the reality of humanity’s reshaping of the environment without giving up in despair. We can, and we should, consider actively moving species at risk of extinction from climate change. We can design ecosystems to maintain wildlife, filter water and sequester carbon.

We can restore once magnificent ecosystems such as Yellowstone and the Gulf of Mexico to new glories – but glories that still contain a heavy hand of man. We can fight mindless development even as we cherish the exuberant nature that can increasingly be found in our own cities, from native gardens to green roofs.And we can do this even as we continue to fight for international agreements on limiting the greenhouse gases that are warming the planet.

The Anthropocene does not represent the failure of environmentalism. It is the stage on which a new, more positive and forward-looking environmentalism can be built.

This is the Earth we have created and we have a duty as a species to protect it and manage it with love and intelligence.

It is not ruined.

It is still beautiful and it can be even more beautiful if we work together and care for it.

– The New York Times Syndicate

» Marris is the author of Rambunctious Garden: Saving Nature in a Post-Wild World

» Kareiva is the chief scientist for the Nature Conservancy

» Mascaro is a postdoctoral associate at the Carnegie Institution for Science and the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute

» Ellis is associate professor of geography and environmental systems at the University of Maryland, Baltimore 

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

 
/News

Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.