The reality TV road to power

2010-12-04 13:32

I assigned Sarah Palin’s Going Rogue in my course on women in contemporary US media and politics.

I spent the week walking around town, riding the train and dashing through airports with the book tucked under my arm. “Isn’t she awesome?” gushed a waitress in a New Jersey restaurant.

My seatmate on a flight to Louisiana smiled knowingly and whipped out her copy of Decision Points (George W Bush’s memoirs).

On my way to California a guy in a University of Alaska sweatshirt nearly threw himself across the aisle to chat with me.

It was a camaraderie with perfect strangers that I once evoked by wearing my Obama tracksuit top.

I expected my Princeton ­students – mostly young women, self-identified as liberal and feminist and actively engaged in local and national politics – to be critical of Palin.

But although they found her authorial voice irritatingly self-assured and disagreed with her policy conclusions, they also found her surprisingly compelling.

They thoughtfully drew parallels between her nontraditional (dare I say mavericky?) career choices and those of Hillary Clinton, whose Living History we read the same week.

I pushed my personal Palin test one step further by watching Sarah Palin’s Alaska with my eight-year-old daughter. My kid’s dislike of Palin is pure, instinctive and content-free.

It’s not as though she has well-formed policy positions; she just knows that Palin isan opponent to be vanquished.

Born in Hyde Park, my daughter learned to read “Obama” as her first word, because it was plastered on signs all over our neighbourhood in 2004.

My kid accompanied me to campaign events throughout 2008 and has heard many kitchen table commentaries railing against Palin and the Tea Party.

But 20 minutes into the first episode, she was transfixed.

She loved watching the baby bears. She was jealous that Palin had a studio in her house: “Mom, can’t you get one from MSNBC?”

She cracked up with hand-clapping hysteria as the mountain-scaling Palin shouted, “I was never a gymnast or a cheerleader!”

At the end my kid declared: “I know we don’t agree with her, but her life sure is interesting.”

Eight-year-olds don’t vote. My students are not planning to switch parties. My book toting elicited as much clucking disapproval as it did enthusiastic bonding.

My experiences are not scientific or systematic, but after reading and watching Palin and the ­reactions to her these past few weeks I am convinced that underestimating her is a mistake of epic proportions.

Much of the urban East Coast discourse about Palin and other Tea Party women is dismissive and mocking.

Most Democratic and many Republican commentators rely on a basic assertion that Palin is stupid and therefore not credible.

But this perspective ignores that visceral emotions are at least as important as sober rationality in making political choices.

Whatever her failings, Palin has successfully harnessed new media forms to engage and direct emotional reactions in ways that are surprisingly effective.

Using Twitter, Facebook, corporate-news punditry, readable memoirs and reality television, ­Palin has managed to subvert ­traditional media.

Rather than pay for advertising, she is getting paid to advertise her politics.

Rather than wait for kingmakers to declare her a contender, she smirks while predicting her victories. Her show is a pinnacle of this new media-saturation strategy.

The show’s producer, Mark ­Burnett of Survivor and The ­Apprentice, pioneered the infiltration of reality shows into network line-ups.

His ingenious use of product integration exploded the profitability and desirability of reality television.

While highbrow critics mocked the lame, melodramatic obviousness of reality TV, the genre revolutionised entertainment.

Sarah Palin’s Alaska is the ultimate test of this form.

Will product placement of a candidate prove to be the flattest, fastest, newest route to the American ­presidency?

In her brilliant new book Reality Bites Back, Jennifer Pozner argues that Americans prefer the scripted “reality” of reality TV to the messy complexity of our lives because these shows “both play to and re-inforce deeply ingrained societal biases about women and men, love and beauty, race and class, consumption and happiness in America”.

And Palin is the perfect reality-show star: more ruthless, more eloquent, more audaciously dishonest, more single-mindedly ambitious, more likable and eminently more electable than Hillary Clinton in 2008.

She is a pencil skirt-wearing marathoner who operates without a shred of shame or self-doubt. There is something remarkable and frightening about the depth of her belief in her narrative.

Every criticism, every defeat, every attack is just evidence of the virtue of her chosen path.

Her show replaces the tough trade-offs of a politically complicated and economically insecure world with a fiery self-assurance born of the hard, bright blindness of righteousness.

In uncertain times, this unassailable certainty, set in the compelling aesthetic of the American frontier and packaged with pitch-perfect editing, proves magnetic even for those who disagree with her.

Pozner reminds us media are “as much a dissemination mechanism for ideological persuasion as ... a means of entertainment”; they are “our most common agent of socialisation, shaping and informing our collective ideas about people, politics and public policy”.

Media, especially reality TV, encourage us to think less and buy more.

They capture our emotions and silence our inner-critic. They send us in search of products to ­fulfil our deepest desires.

Palin may just be the political embodiment of our contemporary cultural moment; a presidential candidate born from TV’s easy emotional draw and limited analytic capacity, a candidate who needs only 140 characters to explain policy, a candidate who attracts us even while repulsing us.

As with reality TV, to underestimate Palin is to invite her to reach ever deeper into the American ­consciousness.

» Melissa Harris-Perry, an associate professor of politics and African-American studies at Princeton University, is completing her latest book, Sister Citizen: A Text for Coloured Girls Who’ve Considered Politics When Being Strong Isn’t Enough


Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

 
/News

Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.