Zuma unlikely to be impeached

2013-07-07 14:00

DA parliamentary leader Lindiwe Mazibuko wrote to Speaker Max Sisulu on Friday, asking him to ­investigate whether President Jacob Zuma had ­misled Parliament about his R206 million Nkandla development.

This comes after the Mail & Guardian published more documentation on Friday showing that Zuma was aware of the extent of the expenditure on his private compound.

The documents include:

» A letter from a police divisional commissioner stating that “by instruction of ... President Zuma, the existing house at Nkandla, currently accommodate (sic) SAPS members, must be converted as part of the president’s household”;

» A Public Works memorandum that states a deadline was given by “the principal” – government speak for the president; and

» Another memorandum on a meeting with former deputy minister Hendrietta Bogopane-Zulu, in which she confirmed Zuma did not want other contractors on site.

“This evidence shows that President Zuma ­omitted important information when questioned in Parliament regarding this upgrade,” Mazibuko said.

If Zuma were an MP and a charge were to be laid against him for misleading Parliament, it would have been handled in terms of the Powers and ­Privileges of Parliament Act.

However, in terms of the Constitution, Zuma ceased to be an MP the moment he was elected president.

Although Zuma is treated as being subject to ­parliamentary rules whenever he addresses Parliament or answers parliamentary questions, the act was not written with the head of state in mind.

Two alternatives exist if the opposition wants to bring the president to book.

The first is a motion of no confidence, which is followed by a debate and a vote. The ANC can defeat the no confidence vote by a simple majority.

The opposition is unlikely to favour that option either after the ANC last year used its majority to block a proposed no confidence debate.

The other option is the one Mazibuko is currently pursuing, which is an effort to impeach Zuma for serious misconduct, in terms of section 89 of the Constitution.

For Zuma to be impeached, a thorough ­parliamentary investigation needs to be conducted. If two-thirds of the National Assembly agree that Zuma is guilty of serious misconduct, he will be ­removed as president.

Given the ANC’s majority in the National ­Assembly, the opposition’s efforts are unlikely to ­succeed.

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

 
/News

Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
Traffic
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.