A ruling party in trouble

2008-09-03 00:00

The African National Congress (ANC) Youth League’s attack on the party’s deputy president, Kgalema Motlanthe, tells us two things. Firstly, that the ANC is more seriously divided than anyone imagined even after the Polokwane punch-up. Secondly, that the Jacob Zuma camp is working itself into a reckless frenzy as it realises its man’s legal position is becoming more fragile.

The attack on Motlanthe was astonishing not only for its presumptuousness, with a bunch of youngsters having the gall to denounce the second most senior figure in the party for trying to discipline them, but also because they are all supposedly in the same Zuma camp.

It was the pro-Zuma crowd, with the Youth League prominent, who chose Motlanthe as the ANC’s alternative candidate for the national presidency should Zuma fail to survive his corruption case. Now the youths are vilifying him, in typically venomous language, for saying that they should stop attacking the judiciary and other important democratic institutions.

So much for the vaunted loyalty and discipline of ANC members. So much, too, for the myth that the ANC is still a united organisation. Not only did it split in two at Polokwane, but in the eight months since it has been writhing in a power struggle at provincial and regional levels that has driven hundreds of Thabo Mbeki supporters from office and out of contention for places on the electoral lists.

Now we have this new evidence that the Zuma camp itself is split — at the highest level.

This bespeaks a party in trouble. The ANC Youth League attack does not in fact come out of the blue. There have been rumours for weeks of growing tensions between Motlanthe and the Zuma camp. As Zuma’s legal problems mount and his prospects of being able to dodge his day in court diminish, Motlanthe begins to loom larger as a rival.

So he must now be “eliminated” by those who proclaim their readiness to “kill for Zuma”.

Which prompts the question of what has happened to the ANC that it has allowed itself to degenerate in this way? Is it not perhaps the same as has happened to many other liberation movements around the continent once their founding objective, that of liberation, was achieved? That there is a loss of that sense of mission and idealism that bound its disparate members together in comradeship once the mission was accomplished and all that was left was the vehicle that got them there — a vehicle now to be seized and controlled to carry individuals to power, privilege and prosperity?

If so, it means not only that the ANC is disintegrating but that it has lost its soul.

This self-destructive behaviour may intensify if Zuma’s position weakens further. Last month’s Constitutional Court judgment came as a great blow to the Zuma camp, for it marked the end of the road for his long legal campaign to prevent a mass of potentially damning documentary evidence in the hands of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) being admissible in court.

Now only one legal avenue remains, and that is to try to stop the case altogether. Two attempts are pending. One was a High Court application made last month to have the decision to prosecute declared unlawful; the other is an application for a permanent stay of prosecution to be made on November 25.

In line with the defence team’s own description of its approach as a “Stalingrad strategy” — meaning it will fight a rearguard action street by street every inch of the way to stop the case — it is clear that even if Zuma should lose these applications he would try to start a new round of appeals, so delaying the trial until after next year’s election. By which time Zuma would be president of South Africa and the ANC could enact a law indemnifying a sitting president from being prosecuted.

But there’s a snag. In last month’s Constitutional Court judgment, Chief Justice Pius Langa noted that while he regarded the right of appeal as important, courts should not allow it to be misused to delay trials. He laid down an injunction that “all courts should discourage pre-trial litigation … that seeks to delay the commencement of trials”.

That has increased the sense of alarm in the Zuma camp, which is why it is now switching its attention to what it calls “a political solution”.

This is gaining public attention, for it sounds like an easy way out of an embarrassing problem. But it is a misnomer. It is not a solution, for there is no “legally and constitutionally tenable way”, as some suggest, to drop a criminal charge against a major public figure.

Any attempt would amount to a political deal that would violate the Rule of Law, the central pillar of our Constitution and of any democratic system.

A special commission, modelled on the Truth and Reconciliation Commission that would exchange truth-telling for amnesty on the arms deal, has been mooted. But that would avail Zuma little, for the arms deal constitutes only a small fraction of the 16 charges he is facing which involve 400 separate payments totalling R4,2 million over 10 years from 1995 to 2005.

Even a special law indemnifying a president from prosecution would be challengeable in the Constitutional Court on the grounds that it violated our Bill of Rights principle that “all are equal before the law”.

It has been suggested that the country’s prosecutorial guidelines may offer a way out, since they state that a prosecutor’s duty is to prosecute a case — unless “public interest demands otherwise …”.

But there is a huge difference between the “public interest” and “public opinion” — especially public opinion confined to a particular political party.

Some in the Zuma camp are suggesting that prosecuting Zuma would be against the public interest because it might provoke unrest. But it is they who are threatening to create the unrest. It would be a most cynical violation of the Rule of Law to use such a self-generated threat as a pretext for dropping a criminal charge against a would-be president whose character should be exposed to the closest possible public scrutiny.

Those tempted by this seemingly quick-fix idea should think carefully. With the disbanding of the Scorpions, the huge pressure on the NPA and the orchestrated campaign to intimidate the judiciary, who in this country will ever again attempt to prosecute a prominent public figure? Corruption, already rife, will become rampant.

That is the road to destruction. My worst case scenario.

My best case scenario would be for Zuma to step aside from the presidential race and have his day in court, leaving Motlanthe, in accordance with the Polokwane decision, to take over and lead the ANC and the country.

Or if Zuma doesn’t really want that day in court, if he fears that the case against him is too forbidding, let him seek a plea bargain. He might then end up with a suspended sentence instead of the 15 years, which is the statutory minimum sentence for the charges he faces. That would prevent him from becoming president of South Africa, but he could, the party willing, still be president of the ANC.

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

 
/Sport

Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
Traffic
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.