About-turn: Concourt review to cover appeal court judgments

2012-03-28 00:00

A DECISION to include the Supreme Court of Appeal judgments in a government review of the Constitutional Court has raised concern.

In an apparent about-turn the Department of Justice has expanded its planned review of Constitutional Court cases to those of the SCA too.

This became apparent yesterday when the department issued the terms of reference for the “assessment of the impact of the decisions” of the two courts.

Dene Smuts, Democratic Alliance spokesperson for justice, said the inclusion of the SCA in the review would prompt concern when seen in light of ANC pronouncements last week.

Smuts was referring to the fact that ANC spokesperson Jackson Mthembu last week expressed “disappointment” with an SCA ruling that the decision to drop criminal charges against Jacob Zuma could be challenged in court by the DA.

Mthembu said it was “clear that democracy can be undermined by simply approaching courts to reverse any decision arrived at by a qualified organ of state”.

Smuts said that “any serious study” would have to include the SCA, but questioned whether there was any need for a “state-sponsored” study.

Justice department spokesperson Tlali Tlali defended the inclusion, saying it was “appropriate” as the court was the highest appeal court in non-constitutional matters.

He told SABC the decision had notthing to do with the recent SCA ruling against the president.

“This decision was taken a long time ago but we had to allow and accommodate a process of finalising the terms of reference,”

Constitutional expert professor Shadrack Gutto is not convinced.

He told SABC: “It is a threat to the independence of the judiciary.

“It sends a signal to judges that if you make a judgment that questions the actions of the executive you may be investigated.

“That can send a chilling effect on judges who are not strong.”

The inclusion of the SCA is also a departure from Justice Minister Jeff Radebe’s announcement last month of what the review would entail, which limited the proposed assessment to the Constitutional Court only. The terms of reference include:

• A comprehensive analysis to establish if court decisions are reforming South African jurisprudence in line with constitutional values;

• An assessment of whether the government can afford implementing decisions;

• The costs of litigation in these courts and the effect this has on access to justice;

• An assessment of the speed with which cases are finalised in the two courts. — WR & City Press.

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

 
/News
Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.