Age of the SUPERBUGS

2014-08-20 00:00

THE rise of antibiotic-resistant superbugs poses what the British Prime Minister David Cameron calls “an unthinkable future” where minor infections could again kill millions of people.

Tens of thousands are already dying of infections that have evolved resistance to common medical treatment. This is a shocking but timely reminder of a pandemic known as the Spanish flu that killed 30 to 50 million people at the end of World War 1.

The pandemic that swept across the globe at the end of World War 1 (1914-1918) has been described by various historians as the greatest medical holocaust in history — up there alongside Aids, tuberculosis, smallpox, malaria, cholera and typhus.

Some believe it might have killed more people than the Black Death in the European Middle Ages, when the rat and flea-carried bubonic plague wiped out a third of the European population.

It is common to focus on the impact influenza had on Western countries in 1918 where systematic information on mortality has been available for a number of years.

But the highest death rates were neither in America or Europe. They were in Asia and Africa — not surprising because the majority of Westerners had access to reasonably decent food and shelter, which was not the case in India, China or most places in Africa.

The Dutch researcher Jan-Bart Gerald told a gathering of academics in 2007 that Spanish influenza originated not in Spain but in France at a military camp where over 100 000 men lived beside pigs and poultry.

Others say it started in China and then spread to Kansas, U.S., carried over into Europe and then Africa and other parts of the world by German and Allied soldiers locked in one of the most appalling slaughters in history.


In March 1918, the deadly virus struck at military camps in the U.S., where soldiers waited shipment to the war in Europe. In the course of three months, over 43 000 soldiers succumbed to the disease.

One of the most striking of the complications was haemorrhage from mucous membranes, especially from the nose, stomach and intestine. Bleeding from the ears and skin also occurred, but the majority of deaths were from bacterial pneumonia. The disease killed 20% of those infected, as opposed to the usual flu epidemic toll of 0,5%.

The epidemic did not kick off in Spain but the name, Spanish flu, stuck.

The names of millions of the war dead are remembered on stones and walls around the world.

There’s no clear division between those who died in combat and those who died of influenza at the war’s end in November 1918.

Like so much else, the devastating impact of the epidemic was played down by the victorious Allies and within a few years, the public’s memory of the Spanish flu fell away and historians call it “the forgotten epidemic”.

Forgotten? Well, almost. It was seen as an extension of one of the many tragedies of the war. “On the battlefield of Northern France,” Gerald explains, “troops on either side of the line, sometimes 500 metres apart, were infected by airborne diseases. In the prisoner of war camps and gas-ridden trenches and dugouts of this horrendous war the disease spread like wildfire and lay the seeds for further outbreaks further afield.”


Hundreds of thousands of men were shipped to Africa where a fierce war between the Germans and British (backed by South Africans and Rhodesians) raged in East Africa.

In 1998, Professor Howard Phillips in the Department of History at the University of Cape Town and Professor David Killingray, organised a conference titled “Refections on the Spanish flu pandemic after 80 years: causes, course and consequences”.

Little known studies were examined, including Terence Ranger’s “The influenza pandemic in Southern Rhodesia: a crisis of comprehension”.

There have been hundreds of learned articles about the impact influenza had on the U.S., Britain, and Europe — relatively few on the devastation it caused in Africa.

In the north-eastern districts of Northern Rhodesia (Zambia), the pandemic arrived in the context of war and famine.

German soldiers under Lettow von Vorbeck had routed British colonial forces, sacked Kasama and seemed set to continue onwards. Enter Spanish flu.

Ian Phimister tells us in Wangi Kolia — Coal, Capital and Labour in Colonial Zimbabwe 1894-1954 that the first case of Spanish flu in neighbouring Southern Rhodesia (Zimbabwe) came in October 1918, one month before the war’s end.

He writes: “From there the epidemic spread swiftly to Gwelo [Gweru], Que Que [Kwekwe] and Salisbury [Harare] before engulfing other towns and districts along the line of rail. Wankie’s turn came on October 14, 1918 , and within the space of a few days nearly 2 000 natives were prostrated.

“The influenza pandemic struck the colliery with explosive force. Like most other large Southern Rhodesian mines, Wankie’s overcrowded, filthy compound provided optimum conditions for the rapid spread of the disease … Hundreds of miners … fled … into the surrounding countryside. Some undoubtedly carried inflection into outlying villages, but many more unquestionably saved their own lives by escaping from the colliery …”

The pandemic spread, fast as a bullet and against the fear of an invisible foe there is no heroic combat.



In South Africa, the authorities reacted by passing more segregation legislation — the Native Urban Areas Act — to separate the races.

However, in some hospitals white nurses were told to treat blacks because the authorities were so frightened it would spread even further without treatment.

In 1902-1935, Jock McCulloch tells us in Black Peril, White Virtue: Sexual Crime in Southern Rhodesia, the “natives” were forbidden from travelling on trains and chiefs were instructed to keep their people confined to their villages.

The state requisitioned cattle and petrol supplies. Almost 10 times as many Europeans died from Spanish flu as were killed in the first chimurenga (war in the Shona language) — the African uprisings against European rule in the late 1890s.

Africans started to believe that the white man’s war in Europe had caused the epidemic that turned customary life upside down in both of the Rhodesias (Zambia and Zimbabwe).

So many women were sick, men had to grind corn and prepare meals. Diets changed. Cassava, a relatively easy crop to grow requiring less labour than maize — became suddenly popular.

Melvin E. Page, writing in The Chiwaya War: Malawians and the First World War, tells us that the connection between the war and the pandemic of influenza was not only immediate but causal. A common expression was that “war air” had brought the devastating disease into Africa because of white men fighting one another thousands of miles away in Europe.


Against the background of an estimated 30 to 50 million deaths in just over one year, it hardly matters where the epidemic started or who was responsible.

It was no respecter of race or ethnic group. All human beings were fair game, much as they are now if David Cameron is right — that superbugs resistant to antibiotics could return us to the European Dark Ages.

A report in The Times (July 2, 2014) said that a team of economists will lead an international group of experts aiming to spur on a new generation of antibiotics.

Jim O’Neill, a former chief economist at Goldman Sachs, has been asked to consider how governments would be able to afford to pay pharmaceutical companies to produce the right drugs that could overcome future epidemics. And also how poorer countries (many of them in Africa) can be encouraged to improve the control of existing antibiotics that are often sold over the counter in shops.

Jeremy Farra, director of the Wellcome Trust, says that drug-resistant bacteria, viruses and parasites are driving a global health crisis. “This,” he says, “threatens not only our ability to treat deadly infections, but almost every aspect of modern medicine from cancer treatment to caesarean sections, therapies that save thousands of lives every day rely on antibiotics that could soon be lost.

“But only five new types of anti­biotics have been introduced since the 1960s and the supply of newly developed drugs is dwindling as companies see little profit in working on treatments designed only to be used as a last resort,” said The Times .

“And, as usual, it will be the poor, the homeless, the already ill and hungry who will bear the brunt of the next medical cataclysm given that we’re all too silly, greedy or both to let anything like that happen again.”

— Politicsweb.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24


Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.