Bonfire of the princesses

2007-12-17 00:00

Contrary to the rumours I have been trying to spread for some time, Disney Princess products are not contaminated with lead. More careful analysis shows that the entire product line — books, DVDs, ball gowns, necklaces, toy cellphones, toothbrush holders, T-shirts, lunch boxes, backpacks, wallpaper, sheets, stickers — is saturated with a particularly potent time-release form of the date rape drug.

We cannot blame China this time, because the drug is in the concept, which was spawned in the Disney studios. Before 2000, the princesses were just the separate, disunited, heroines of Disney animated films — Snow White, Cinderella, Ariel, Aurora, Pocahontas, Jasmine, Belle and Mulan. Then Disney’s Andy Mooney got the idea of bringing the gals together in a team.

With a wave of the wand ($10,99, tiara included) they were all elevated to royal status and set loose on the world as an imperial cabal — and ever since have busied themselves achieving global domination. Today, there is no little girl in the wired, industrial world who does not seek to display her allegiance to the pink-and-purple-clad Disney dynasty.

Disney likes to think of the princesses as role models, but what a sorry bunch of wusses they are. Typically, they spend much of their time in captivity or a coma, waking up only when a prince comes along and kisses them. The most striking exception is Mulan, who dresses as a boy to fight in the army, but — like the other princess of colour, Pocahontas — she lacks full princess status and does not warrant a line of tiaras and gowns. Otherwise the princesses have no ambitions and no marketable skills, although both Snow White and Cinderella are good at housecleaning.

And what could they aspire to, beyond landing a prince? In Princessland, the only career ladder leads from baby-faced adolescence to a position as an evil enchantress, stepmother or witch.

Feminist parents gnash their teeth. Even Barbie looks like a suffragette compared to Disney’s Belle. So what’s the appeal of the pink tulle princess cult?

Seen from the witchy end of the female life cycle, the princesses exert their pull through a dark and undeniable eroticism. They’re sexy little wenches, for one thing. Snow White has become slimmer and bustier over the years; Ariel wears nothing but a bikini top (though, admittedly, she is half fish). In faithful imitation, the three-year-old in my life flounces around with her tiara askew and her princess gown sliding off her shoulder, looking for all the world like a London socialite after a hard night of cocaine and booze. Then she demands a poison apple and falls to the floor in a beautiful swoon. Pass the Rohypnol-laced margarita, please.

It may be old-fashioned to say so, but sex — and especially some middle-aged man’s twisted version thereof — doesn’t belong in the pre-school playroom. Children are going to discover it soon enough, but they’ve got to do so on their own.

There’s a reason, after all, why we’re generally more disgusted by sexual abusers than adults who inflict mere violence on children: we sense that sexual abuse more deeply messes with a child’s mind. One’s sexual inclinations — straightforward or kinky, active or passive, heterosexual or homosexual — should be free to develop without adult intervention or manipulation. Hence our harshness towards the kind of sexual predators who leer at children and offer sweets. But Disney, which also owns ABC, Lifetime, ESPN, A&E and Miramax, is rewarded with $4 billion a year for marketing the masochistic princess cult and its endlessly proliferating paraphernalia.

Let’s face it, no parent can stand up against this alone.

Try to ban the princesses from your home and you might as well turn yourself in to Child Protective Services before the little girls get on their princess cellphones.

No, the only way to topple royalty is through a mass uprising of the long-suffering serfs. Assemble with your neighbours and make a holiday bonfire out of all that plastic and tulle! March on Disney World with pitchforks held high!

— Agence Global.

• Barbara Ehrenreich, the author of Nickel and Dimed (Owl), is the winner of the 2004 Puffin/Nation Prize.

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

 
/News

Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.