‘Cornerstone of white supremacy’

2013-06-19 00:00

“AWAKING on Friday morning, June 20, 1913, the South African native found himself, not actually a slave, but a pariah in the land of his birth.”

This is Sol Plaatje’s memorable verdict on the Natives Land Act (NLA), recorded in Native Life in South Africa, first published in 1916. Some of the most poignant words written by a South African, they speak to the very heart of this country’s 20th-century tragedy, with repercussions that live on today.

In Tsala ea Batho, Plaatje described Africans on the “brink of a precipice”. The NLA addressed two closely connected white economic fears: labour shortage and competition from African farmers. It did so by outlawing land ownership and occupation by Africans outside designated reserves, thus extending to the whole country the law of the Orange Free State (“Only Slave State” in Plaatje’s words).

The consequence was to prejudice two practices: share cropping, a form of interracial agricultural partnership that had proved highly successful, particularly in the Free State, although it was resented by poor whites; and land rental.

The major change was a shift from rent payment to labour tenancy and wage labour. As historian Colin Bundy puts it: “Peasants became serfs”. The Land Act was not just about land, it was a revolutionary measure designed to effect long-term change in the political, economic and social relationship between whites and Africans. In Plaatje’s view, it “arrest[ed] … native progress”, condemning Africans as a group to labourer status.

In the short term, the very success of independent African farmers was regarded by whites as a factor in labour scarcity: Africans were becoming too well-off and had to be excluded from the modern economy.

The people disparagingly referred to as squatters were, in fact, competent small farmers. African farming, virtually indistinguishable from white, went into steep decline and the wages of farm labour were driven down. In Natal, A.T. Bryant described how the act established greater control over labour, to the benefit of increasingly commercialised farming.

The parliamentary opposition pointed out the haste involved: the NLA had not been included in the governor-general’s speech and the legislation was rail-roaded through in one session. The Land Commission that should have preceded it, reported only in 1916, with what Plaatje described as “diabolical” consequences. Unusually, the governor-general agreed in advance not to withhold royal assent. The amount of land purchased by Africans was minuscule, suggesting that the NLA was based on a deliberately contrived panic. It was a punitive measure, an act of dispossession with short-term economic imperatives driven by longer-term political ambition. Plaatje called it class legislation: although it purported to limit white rights in the reserves, he pointed out that there was “no such person as a white squatter”.

Bill Johnson writes that with supportive legislation that followed in the twenties, the NLA was a “cornerstone of white supremacy”.

The tone of the debate in the House of Assembly confirms this. Minister of Native Affairs J.W. Sauer promised that “the bulk of the two races, the European and the native, should live in the main in separate areas”, although the NLA did not apply to municipalities. He argued that land purchases by Africans were “accentuat[ing] feelings of race prejudice and animosity with unhappy results”, and there was frequent mention of the “native problem”, the “squatting evil” and “friction” in what was clearly regarded as a white man’s country.

Selby Msimang wisely interpreted the legislation as the reflection of a white view that there was no community of interest with Africans. This was to have dire consequences.

The unionists supported segregation but called for administration, not legislation. Speakers expressed concern about the voiceless millions; justice, toleration and the fate of workers who had contributed to development; the positive role of individual land title in developing societies; and the effect of rigid demarcation: “a wire fence” in Patrick Duncan’s words.

T.L. Schreiner, elder brother of Olive Schreiner and the NLA’s most trenchant critic, asked how areas that already showed a high level of racially mixed ownership could be unscrambled, a question answered decades later by the brutality of apartheid-era bureaucrats.

The immediate result was the uprooting of thousands of Africans, their livestock and possessions, in the mid-winter of 1913.

Plaatje describes at first hand the refugees and their starving cattle, victims of “harsh and callous instigators”. He recalls the death of a baby whose outcast parents had to dig a “stolen”, and presumably forever unmarked, grave in the dark.

In Bessie Head’s words, Africans had become “a floating landless proletariat whose labour could be … manipulated at will”.

Many ended up in the reserves, protectorates or towns. There is evidence that farmers anticipated the passage of the act before June: sharecroppers were either thrown off the land or forced to relinquish their stock and become wage labourers. An underdeveloped peasantry confined to the reserves provided a reservoir of cheap labour for the mines that transferred the costs of reproduction to rural areas.

It is perhaps no coincidence that this was an era of growth for independent churches, the leaders of which, with their millennial tendencies, held some promise of land and security. And it was a rallying point for the infant South African Native National Congress, of which Plaatje was the first secretary-general. He travelled with delegations to London in 1914 and 1919, in unsuccessful attempts to get the legislation overturned, his book a powerful political polemic written specifically to promote this doomed cause. But his words were prophetic: “South Africa has, by law, ceased to be the home of any of her native children whose skins are dyed with a pigment that does not conform with the regulation hue.”

Sharecropping and rent-paying tenancy survived clandestinely. Although the 1936 Native Land and Trust Act, which released more land, abolished common-roll franchise and established the consultative Native Representative Council, was even more draconian, it was only in the sixties that final evictions took place. Labour tenancy survived because of the weakness of the agricultural sector and the inability of farmers to compete successfully for workers. Ironically, until the fifties, the number of Africans on white farms increased.

The history of South Africa has largely been one of struggle over land and labour.

The NLA was repealed in 1991, and under a democratic dispensation, a process of land restitution and reform was started, which remains partially unrealised. But in the 100 years that have elapsed, the basis of advanced modern economies has shifted from resources such as land to intellectual capital. The desire to reverse the malign effects of the NLA now has as much to do with the national psyche as the economy.

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

 
/News

Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
Traffic
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.