HRC plays it sorry but safe

2010-12-04 00:00

IN 2008, a wave of attacks against refugees and migrants from elsewhere on the continent swept South Africa, killing scores and ravaging the lives of thousands. The brittle side of the “rainbow nation” was exposed and the shame lingers.

The South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) has now released its report on the violence against “non-nationals”. The report is pretty much summed up by the euphemistic pomposity of the word “non-nationals” — is “foreigners” or “aliens” too emotive?

The report, although well intentioned, is consigned to ineffectuality by the SAHRC’s failure to address the political challenges resulting from those awful events.

The first nettle is that of a denialism regarding xenophobia that is as pernicious as that which once paralysed the government’s response to HIV/Aids. Former president Thabo Mbeki insists to this day that the attacks were not aimed at foreigners, while National Police Commissioner Bheki Cele told a media conference this year that “I will only believe there is xenophobia in our country if communities stand up and tell foreigners to leave”.

The belief that black South Africans are incapable of anything but fraternal goodwill towards other black Africans is an article of political faith for many in government. It is thus unsurprising that the police were hopelessly unprepared for the 2008 attacks and, unless there is a change in attitude, are unlikely to do any better in the future.

Denialism paralysed the government in 2008, with violence raging for a week before Mbeki mobilised the military. The SAHRC glosses over this abject failure of leadership, merely noting mildly that there still is “no evidence of introspection by the Presidency of the timing or overall effectiveness or appropriacy of the executive decision to deploy the army.”

The need for presidential vigour in responding to explosions of social conflict is not even mentioned in the main SAHRC recommendations. Nor, for that matter, does the SAHRC find it anything more than “regrettable” that the Defence ministry, among unnamed others, failed to co-operate with the investigation.

Another nettle is that of justice. Officially, 62 people were killed in 2008 and at least 670 wounded, dozens were raped, and at least 100 000 people “displaced” — that’s officialspeak for “fled for their lives” — with property worth millions looted or destroyed by local residents and their leaders.

Yet not a single person has been jailed for murder and of the only 597 prosecutions of any kind that were brought, a mere 159 have been completed, with 98 convictions.

These are distressing statistics, especially given that only a fraction of criminal acts led to charges, but the best the SAHRC can do is the feeble admission that there was a “limited attainment of justice for the victims”.

Then there is the politically explosive matter of accountability. The SAHRC notes that there were many claims that the police used “excessive force, were accessories to attacks or looting, incited violence … or stood by while crimes took place.”

The SAHRC makes no finding on this and appears not to have pursued this worrying accusation with the Police ministry.

Finally, there is the nettle of local government structures where “poor infrastructure, undercapacitated police and privatised, authoritarian leadership structures may intersect to create conditions where the rule of law barely exists and impunity reigns for rogue leaders and common criminals alike”.

The SAHRC solution is basically to ask the political parties to encourage their rogue leaders to behave better in future.

The only time that the SAHRC tortoise boldly sticks its head beyond its carapace is when it comes to the media.

It is likely, the SAHRC opines, “that media images and reporting made visible the level of impunity enjoyed by many perpetrators, reducing the disincentive to committing crimes publicly”. Ah, at last the villain.

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

 
/News

Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.