Kenya: the politics of spectacular violence

2013-09-26 00:00

THE masked gunmen who stormed Nairobi’s Westgate Mall on Saturday did one thing right. In targeting a site at the epicenter of elite consumerism in the upscale neighborhood of Westlands, they galvanised worldwide attention.

As the mainstream media offers us a play-by-play of the unfolding hostage crisis, and as my Twitter and Facebook newsfeeds are flooded with declarations of anger and sorrow —sentiments I of course share — two things are apparent.

First, the extent to which the more privileged and educated segments of our world community find certain forms of violence in certain locales to be horrifying and objectionable.

Second, the classed and racialised framings that shape our understandings of the issue at hand. Together, these notions work to differentiate between human lives that are worthy of grief, and those that are not.

What is it about the targeting of innocents on islands of privatised leisure like Westgate that strikes such a strong emotional chord across the world?

Is it not that the majority of us who (have the ability to) log in every hour for updates see ourselves in the victims, knowing that we regularly occupy these very spaces?

Perhaps it is in this vein that we can make sense of the deafening silence in the context of the transnational plundering of neighbouring Somalia — a country that readers of the New York Times and Kenya’s Daily Nation have been conditioned to see as representing the antithesis of liberal cosmopolitanism, as requiring external tutelage in the name of “peace and stability”, and whose ongoing destruction is more commonly understood as the work of Somalis themselves, rather than as the product of a complex assemblage of internal and external actors with competing political and economic interests.

How is it that the presence and violence of certain actors in the region — whether the Kenya Defence Forces (KDF) and its African Union peacekeeping (Amisom) partners in Somalia, or U.S. and Israeli forces advising the KDF in Nairobi — is normalised in our collective imaginaries as legitimate, while exceptional violence by non-state actors against upper-class Kenyans and expatriates triggers such an immediate outcry?

Just three months after its invasion of Somalia in October 2011, the Kenyan military reportedly claimed the lives of at least 700 Somali “militants”.

UN reports have documented the black-market sales by peacekeeping troops of arms, intended for the Somali government, to oppositional groups, including Al-Shabaab, and Human Rights Watch reports of indiscriminate mortar and rocket attacks by Amisom in civilian areas, leading not only to loss of life but also repeated displacement.

If up to 3 000 Amisom forces have died since the peacekeeping operation was launched in 2007, one can only imagine what the number of Somali casualties might be.

Our implicit acceptance of the ostensible humanitarian logic underlying such destruction amounts to what Talal Asad has referred to as the “etiquette of death dealing”, characterised by nods of regret for such “unfortunate” loss of life.

Witnesses to the attack in Nairobi reported that the suspects “looked like Somalis” and “chanted ‘Allahu Akbar’ as they entered the building”. The spectral and racialised image of the terrifying Muslim (explicitly non-Kenyan) Somali is conjured once again to capture liberal anxieties, while the security apparatuses of Kenya, Israel and the U.S. are visually and rhetorically incorporated into cosmopolitan imaginaries of peace-keeping and secular diplomacy.

If we are to believe that the Westgate attack was the work of Al-Shabaab, as the organisation itself claims, does this not demand consideration that this weekend’s tragedy might be a political response to a transnational project of state-sanctioned violence in neighbouring Somalia? Is it not Somalia that has been the epicentre of a war zone and not Westgate Mall, as the New York Times claims?

Given the amplified surveillance and suspicion of Kenya’s Muslim minorities since 9/11, one can’t help but dread how widely the tentacles of this war zone will extend, whether onto the streets of Mombasa or into the homes of Eastleigh.

The targets of “just” violence deemed so integral to secular modernity will be lucky to garner an ounce of the empathy we have all expressed in response to the tragedy at Westgate. — Reuters.

• Samar Al-Bulushi is a doctoral student in anthropology at Yale.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24


Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.