Marrying into the rainbow family?

2011-03-18 00:00

WHILE most South Africans tolerate what might appear to them habits peculiar to Islam, the current debate around the proposed Muslim Marriage Bill is bringing up an important social debate — and long-overdue insights into “Muslim-ness” and the diverse forces at work within Muslim communities — into the wider public arena.

In the shade of gilded minarets, on the backs of women sashaying down jacaranda-lined streets in Swarovski-encrusted abayas (or burqahs, as most people might know them), and at the behest of renegade theologians armed with keyboards, a brouhaha has erupted over the release of the Muslim Marriage Bill for public comment. The bill is a set of legislative proposals to govern the framework around Muslim marriages in South Africa. Because Muslim marriage is not recognised by the country’s judicial system, aggrieved Muslims cannot access the reparation offered by the courts as people can in other recognised forms of marriage.

That is set to change should the bill become law. You’d think the news would be met with the kind of fireworks that signal celebration, not the kind that signal an ungainly war.

The outcry over the bill has largely been painted as a battle of wills between the religious establishment and women’s rights advocacy groups. It isn’t. The bill has become yet another trope upon which religious leaders contest power. Women’s rights are a mere circumstance as South Africa’s divisive Muslim theologians fight a tug-of-war over the hearts and minds of the country’s Muslim population.

Even within the range of that curious parallel universe known as “the Muslim world”, we sometimes fail to realise that Islam is not homogenous. There exist remarkably varying expressions of Islam, some more palatable than others, some more politically correct than others, but all united in their adherents calling themselves Muslim. This is particularly true of Muslims in South Africa.

A Muslim identity in South Africa, implying one unifying identity straddling race, ethnicity and class, is not easily achieved. Muslims historically immigrated to South Africa at distinctly different periods, and from diverse backgrounds and origins, which led to a diverse Muslim population. The diversity that these waves of immigration produced was maintained by the apartheid policies of racial and ethnic segregation, and still exists 16 years into a free South Africa. Any attempt to represent the Muslim community in its totality is fraught with difficulty, as opposing views clash over who is mandated to represent all Muslims in South Africa.

This is exemplified by the number of halaal-certification bodies clamouring to be the voice that distinguishes what Muslims can and cannot eat. For a segment of the population that accounts for less than two percent of South Africans, there are at least four different halaal-certification bodies stamping their approval on everything from chips to toothpicks. And while the lay Fatima writhes in confusion over whether her meal of Rainbow chicken is indeed halaal, despite the stamp on the packet, it’s long been documented that these deep-seated differences have inhibited the ability of Muslims to come together to advance the Muslim cause in a way that incorporates Islam into the diversity of experience of South African life.

And yet it has happened. Last year, in response to Zapiro’s “Draw Mohammed Day” cartoon in the Mail and Guardian, seven bodies of Muslim theologians came together under the banner of The United Ulema Council of South Africa (UUCSA) to meet with Nic Dawes and Jonathan Shapiro to express in one voice their disapproval. To my memory at least, it was an unprecedented display of unity among the country’s Muslim clerics and it’s proved not to be the first time that varying interpretations of Muslim-ness in South Africa have been able to agree with each other.

The Muslim Marriage Bill has proved to be another occasion for the UUCSA to try to quell differences in the name of the greater good. The UUCSA, together with women’s rights activists and members of the legal fraternity, submitted what they believe should be enshrined in the proposed bill. The Department of Justice and Constitutional Development in turn mulled over these submissions and then released its ruminations for public comment. In response, one branch of the seven-pronged UUCSA has withheld its support of the bill, rejecting it in its entirety as being fundamentally at odds with Islamic ethos.

But while the Jamiatul Ulema in KwaZulu-Natal has been circumspect in its rejection of the bill, the bogeyman of the Muslim community in South Africa, the Majlis, a murky organisation with a reported foothold in Port Elizabeth and a fortress in De Deur, south of Johannesburg, has labelled the bill “The Kufr Muslim Marriages Bill” (where kufr in Islamic jurisprudence denotes disbelief in the core principles of monotheism and the “prophethood” of Mohammed). The Majlis, supported by attorney Zehir Omar, has bullied community media outlets believed to be advocating for the bill, and has even bizarrely pontificated that the bill is unconstitutional for implicitly discriminating against Muslims. The Majlis generally provides more comic relief than spiritual guidance to Muslims in South Africa. When mosques stopped distributing its monthly newspapers, it began shooting off electronic newsletters instead. The medium may have changed, but the message remains the same regressive, asinine rhetoric that does not reflect the views of the majority of Muslims in this country. The Majlis has built its brand as a detractor of established opinion. You get the feeling that had the UUCSA been opposed to the bill, the Majlis might have been its most vehement supporter. The group has leveraged the power of print and electronic media to build a powerful voice. Its views, though, are usually met with the kind of shock and awe reserved for B-grade Hollywood thrillers. Nobody knows for sure who the Majlis is, or who its supporters are, but it represents a minority of South African Muslims.

South African Muslims seek to remain an integrated part of the South African consciousness, but the opposition the Marriage Bill has received seriously questions the understanding of what a formal integration means.

In their antagonism towards the bill, it is fascinating to note that some Muslims believe they could well live in South Africa, brandishing South African passports, and yet be above the rule of law. The Constitution, with its core principles of democracy, freedom and equality, remains sacrosanct, and the Muslim Marriage Bill, should it be enacted, will be just one facet of the law of the country. The UUCSA has rightly cautioned: “Our choice is either to have a regulated system which will be governed by the Muslim Marriage Bill setting out the relevant Islamic law or to have an unregulated system which will allow courts to develop laws on Muslim marriages on a haphazard basis with consequences for the whole community.”

The Muslim Marriage Bill inherently recognises the place of Muslims in South Africa and makes provision for a Muslim experience within a broader South African one. While an existential crisis has accompanied Muslims everywhere, South Africa could prove that the Muslim world is not an other-worldly place. It will prove that the idiosyncrasies of the Muslim experience can be incorporated into broader society. By seeking to secure the rights of a minority, South Africa exemplifies the true sense of democracy.

Thinking of democracy in its true sense may sound wonderfully prosaic and a grand idea that can never stand the harsh light of day, but we need only turn to North Africa to realise that people are putting their lives on the line for a taste of this grand idea. Yes, even the UUCSA has objections to the bill in its current form, but to reject the Muslim Marriage Bill would be to slap the face of the integration of Muslims into South African society.

— wwwthedailymaverick.co.za

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

 
/News

Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.