Property rights

2008-06-27 00:00

The recent history of Zimbabwe provides a salutary reminder of the possible consequences of failure to address land reform. The South African government wishes to see 30% of farmland in black hands by 2014, but at the present rate this is a remote ambition. Progress is slow, it is said, because of the willing-seller, willing-buyer mechanism and the operation of the free market.

Landowners dispute this, citing numerous examples of sellers thwarted by bureaucratic shortcomings within the Department of Agriculture and Land Affairs. Farms remain unproductive while official wheels grind slowly, or not at all. The government’s response is to introduce legislation enabling expropriation in the public interest. This includes land reform: the new law, it is argued, has transformative purpose. Parliament’s own lawyers have suggested that the Expropriation Bill is unconstitutional, adding weight to the call from the official opposition for its suspension. Its most contentious provision is the power given to the minister to order an expropriation and set a value on compensation. The threat to constitutional rights involves property, the role of the courts and just administrative action.

Security of tenure is not a matter to be taken lightly. Food security in an age of escalating input costs and general economic uncertainty depends upon a strong agricultural sector. This requires a commitment to the land by skilled farmers who have sufficient confidence to invest over the long term. Potentially draconian powers wielded by the executive and largely beyond the review of the courts will provide little encouragement.

Any general threat to property rights will discourage much needed investment in all sectors of the economy. Spokespeople for the agricultural sector have voiced fears of a breakdown in trust between farmers and the government. These are reasons why the call for the bill to be redrafted makes good sense.

The government is trying to cover its failures by acquiring greater executive control rather than fixing administrative shortcomings. This proposed legislation contains the seeds of land nationalisation and is yet more evidence of the ruling party’s desire for a further concentration of power. It should be strongly resisted.

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

 
/News

Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
Traffic
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.