Sharp words as ANC bulldozes secrecy bill changes

2013-10-11 00:00

CAPE TOWN — The ANC yesterday used its majority to force through amendments to the State Information Bill without any consideration of alternatives.

In protest against the process, all opposition parties abstained from voting.

Two sections of the bill were amended, (42 and 45) as well as a slew of grammar and punctuation errors in other sections. The amendments to section 42 were only to correct a wrong cross reference. The amendments to section 45 prevent corruption, mismanagement and tender fraud, among other offences, being swept under the carpet by making it an offence to wrongly declare information as secret.

Opposition parties said while all the amendments improved the bill, the vague wording President Jacob Zuma used in referring the bill back to Parliament would not pass muster in the Constitutional Court.

The court’s verdicts have always stated clearly that the president must be specific and clear on which aspects of a bill he is referring back for amendment, and why he is doing so.

“The manner in which this request was handled can create a precedent that heads of state can send back to Parliament any legislation that they do not like,” said DA MP Dene Smuts.

ANC MPs yesterday rejected the opposition parties’ suggestions out of hand and voted in their own recommendations as well as those of the State’s chief legal adviser, advocate Enver Daniels.

Despite the insistence of even Cecil Burgess, ANC MP and chair of the ad hoc committee, that the opposition’s objections must be recorded in the committee report, the ANC used its majority to block this from the record.

“Why must we compromise? We have won. They [the opposition] don’t have any muscle. This is how a democracy works,” said Jerome Maake, ANC MP.

“Oh, so might is right,” answered Smuts.

“Democracy rests on decision making within agreed rules. You should at least know the damn rules. This is not a democracy. It is a dictatorship,” said IFP MP Dr Mario Ambrosini, to Burgess, his ANC colleague.

Ambrosini pointed out that section 20 contains a similar language error as section 45 had, but this had not been on Daniels’s list (who had approved the faulty bill in the first instance) and hence was rejected by the ANC.

“The president probably missed that [error],” Smuts said, referring to the ANC’s constant insinuations that it was Zuma’s own sharp legal knowledge that had led to the list of amendments. The National Assembly will next vote on the amended bill.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24


Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.