Six ways to put the ANC succession genie back in the bottle

2012-04-05 00:00

FOR people the world over, the footage that emerged from North Korea after the death of Kim Jong-il was truly fascinating. That is, how masses of people were forced to show intense grief to lament the death of their leader. They couldn’t just be sad or wipe away tears.It had to be demonstrable mourning through loud and continuous wailing, so the rest of the world could see just how much North Koreans loved their leader.

 

It turns out that forcing people to sit together and smile to show how much they love their leader and each other isn’t any less painful. You couldn’t help but feel sorry for ANC Deputy President Kgalema Motlanthe and Treasurer Mathews Phosa during the highly anticipated and extraordinary press conference by the ANC’s six national officials on Tuesday. Sure they stuck to the script and delivered the right sound bites, but there was no possible way their participation in that press conference was something they would have chosen to do or enjoyed, despite Secretary-General Gwede Mantashe’s re-assurance that “all six of us are loyal to the decision” to hold the briefing.

Motlanthe and Phosa have the enfant terrible Julius Malema to thank for the pleasure of being wheeled out to demonstrate unity at the ANC’s highest level. He really did push the boat out too far with his “dictatorship under the presidency of Jacob Zuma” comment on Friday, and, of course, the ANC was justified in responding strongly to such an offensive attack on the organisation by one of its own. Well, still one of its own, until Cyril Ramaphosa and his Disciplinary Appeals Committee finally cut the umbilical cord.

Since his rise to prominence and subsequent election as ANC Youth League president, Malema has played havoc with the ANC’s disciplinary rule book and tormented the party leaders — first Thabo Mbeki and then Zuma. But nothing he said about Zuma during a centenary event at Wits University last Friday night — in the presence of Phosa — was worse than what he said about Mbeki — in the presence of Zuma and Mantashe.

It is now a matter of public record that Malema’s fiery comments disparaging Mbeki’s leadership outside the Pietermaritzburg High Court, after Judge Chris Nicholson struck Zuma’s corruption case off the roll in 2008, was the impetus behind Mbeki’s recall a week later. Malema did not face any rebuke from the ANC for this, and many other ad hominem attacks against ANC leaders and other high-profile public figures.

So it’s not as if Malema had a sudden bout of outrageous behaviour to prompt the dramatic show of force by the ANC’s top six officials. The “shockingly crude, disrespectful and un-ANC remarks” which they said necessitated the media briefing, have been around for years, the difference being that it was previously useful to the incumbent leadership to goad and batter their opponents.

Now the problem is that a perception has been created that the national officials of the ANC are “at odds with each other and divided over a whole range of issues”. “These remarks are also meant to portray the national officials as disunited, as well as competing against each other for positions within the organisation,” Mantashe read from the officials’ written statement.

Malema has been taunting Zuma and Mantashe for some time, particularly after the disciplinary procedures against him began. The difference in the past two weeks is that he has been needling the ANC in the presence, first of Motlanthe, and then Phosa — and neither called him to order.

This then provided the ideal opportunity for Zuma and Mantashe to put the lid on the succession debate. In other words, the progressing campaign to kick them out of their positions. It would have been really difficult for the two people most at risk in the succession battle to get up and say what they really want to: “Shut up and stop campaigning against us.”

Under the banner of discipline and party unity, it was much easier to force their challengers into a ceasefire. By parading all six officials and locking them into a public declaration of “no campaigning in our names”, Zuma and Mantashe have effectively neutralised Motlanthe and Phosa — as well as the (for now) silent agitator Fikile Mbalula — whose names feature on various slates proposing new leadership combinations in the ANC’s top six.

If in future, Motlanthe and Phosa appear on any platform where the succession issue arises or comments critical to Zuma and Mantashe are made, they would look like hypocrites if they do not immediately condemn them. Furthermore, every time stories appear in the media about their possible candidacy for election, they are going to have to distance themselves from such talk.

So on the face of it, Zuma and Mantashe have outsmarted their opponents and won the day. However, ANC leaders contesting leadership positions never do their own bidding — it’s their minions who do. When the leadership battle was raging in the run-up to the ANC’s Polokwane conference, Zuma never muddied his hands by campaigning for the ANC presidency — he had the coalition of the wounded to champion the challenge against Mbeki.

That is why attempts by Mbeki to lock him into a similar farce didn’t work, and in fact, had the opposite effect. In a bizarre twist at the time, Mbeki and Zuma issued a joint statement declaring there were no divisions between them, and that people should stop using their names to campaign. The statement went down like a lead balloon — their respective factions laughed and pursued their relentless campaigns right until the Polokwane showdown.

If anything, the staged parade of a united front by the ANC’s senior officials shows a level of desperation by Zuma to retain power in the face of a serious onslaught against his presidency. If he was really confident of his support and that the voting numbers to the Mangaung Conference sway in his favour, there would be no need to trundle out his would-be competitors, and make a public show of getting them to back off.

Mantashe could have issued the statement on behalf of the officials, and explained their disapproval of breaches in discipline. But Zuma knows the level of discontent in the ANC is building, and this could easily translate into a rebellion at Mangaung. And six pairs of hands is much more useful than two to force the succession genie back in the bottle. For now.

 

• This article first appeared on www.thedailymaverick.co.za and iMaverick.

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

 
/News

Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.