So bad it’s … just really bad

2012-03-05 00:00

THE democratisation of film through sites like YouTube impacts on film both positively and negatively. On the one hand it has opened up a forum for film-makers to exhibit their work and explore personal moments from their varied lives; on the other hand it has elevated films lacking in craft and obsessed by the paradoxical relationship film has with reality. Thus we get the exploitation of shock and horror. We are meant to believe that what we are seeing is real and herein lies the conceit of the “found footage” genre.

The Blair Witch Project (1999) is perhaps the most famous example of a fictional film supposedly edited from “real-life” footage. The joke was on us, as it was with Orson Welles’s live radio broadcast of aliens landing on Earth in 1938. The weapons of mass destruction fiasco blurred the lines between make-believe and reality even more. Why then would we ever believe in the exorcisms of The Devil Inside?

The great frustration with this terribly directed hogwash is how seriously it takes itself and how stupid it thinks we are. Something even more terrifying is that it opened at No.1 on the American box office in early January although sanity prevailed in both the 3.5/10 rating on IMDB and 2.6/10 on Rotten Tomatoes.

The plot in a nutshell involves a young woman who decides to make a documentary about her mother. Mother, now residing in an asylum near Rome, was responsible for the death of two priests and a nun during her exorcism. Daughter, with cameraman in tow, hooks up with a duo of renegade Catholic priests. They use holy water and harsh biblical quotations to extract a swearing demon from a double-jointed contortionist. Of course it all goes pear-shaped when they decide to liberate Momma, resulting in the worst ending I’ve seen in the last 10 years.

The performances are horrific considering its vérité approach. I can hear the director saying “I need more reality here”. Just how do you make things more real than real as an actor — you fake it and swear a little bit. The “bad aesthetic” camera work is so completely contrived that the film keeps slipping into unknowing parody. All the while it remains humourlessly obsessed with sprouting exorcism clichés.

My suggestion is to make a real splatter movie for YouTube by putting the director in stocks and pelting him with rotten tomatoes. *

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

 
/Sport

Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.