Street rules in Iran

2009-06-19 00:00

THE rules for street demonstrations are different in Iran. Even in the most oppressive states, the rulers know that outbursts of popular anger should be contained with as little violence as possible, but elsewhere the authorities always see deadly force as the final resort. Whereas in Iran, killing demonstrators practically guarantees that the authorities will lose in the end.

The demonstrations in Tehran have grown bigger every day since the presidential election results were announced on Saturday. By Monday there were hundreds of thousands of protesters on the street. The police and the various paramilitary forces had arrested and/or beaten hundreds of them, but the first shots were not heard until Monday night. That was not just good luck.

Most Iranians are Shia Muslims, and Shias have a great reverence for martyrdom. Kill a demonstrator, and you create a martyr. Kill 100, and you create a revolution. That was how the Shah was driven from power 30 years ago, and everybody on both sides in Iran should remember that very well.

The crowds demonstrating against the Shah’s tyranny, his brutal secret police and his stridently secular policies in 1978-79 were almost entirely non-violent. Nevertheless, they were shot down in their hundreds and thousands by the forces of “law and order”, who could not find any other way of dispersing them.

But the protesters kept coming back, with their dead in their arms, until they were exhausted — and then 40 days later, when the mourning period was over, they were back on the streets again, offering themselves up once more to be killed. No regime can go on for very long once that starts happening. Its own henchmen become sickened by what they are being compelled to do, and start to desert it.

That is the secret music that drives the dance in Tehran’s streets today. The regime of Supre­me Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and recently re-elected President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (if you believe that he really won the election) knows that it must quell the protests without killing demonstrators and triggering a cycle of martyrdom. And the demonstrators know (althoug­h they will not admit it openly) that they need martyrs.

Did the regime really rig the election? There were no impartial foreign observers with free access to the polling stations to offer an unbiased opinion, but the circumstantial evidence gives cause for suspicion.

The outcome was announced much faster than usual: the normal three-day verification and declaration was skipped, and Ahmadinejad’s victory was proclaimed only two hours after the polls closed.

There was a curious uniformity in the results from very different parts of the country. For example, even in Tabriz, the home city of the leading opposition candidate, Mir Hossein Moussavi, it was alleged that Ahmadinejad had won 57% of the vote. Yet the overwhelming majority of people in Tabriz are Azeris, who normally show a strong bias for ethnic Azeri candidates like Moussavi.

Above all, the margin by which Ahmadinejad is said to have won — 63% versus 34% for Moussavi — seems incredible to most urban, middle-class Iranians. They would have accepted a close result, with both the leading candidates coming in under 50% and the other candidates dropping out for the second round. They would even have accepted a narrow victory for Ahmadinejad in the second round, but this just does not ring true for them.

If this is only a few days of protests about a stolen election, in a country which is only half-democratic anyway, then it doesn’t matter very much. If it turns out to be the straw that broke the camel’s back, then it is a very big deal indee­d.

It could be, because 30-year-old revolutions tend to have a big problem with a younger generation who benefited from some aspects of the revolution (the vast majority of young Iranians are literate, for example), but who chafe at its restrictio­ns. In fact, generational turnover is the biggest killer of ageing revolutions. We will know if that is going to be the case in Iran in a few days’ time.

History does not run on rails. It’s more like raindrops running down a windowpane, their course determined by tiny imperfections in the glass or fly spots on the surface. If more than a dozen or so protesters are killed in the streets of Tehran, then the regime will be in truly serious danger. Even if Ahmadinej­ad really did win.

 

• Gwynne Dyer is a London-based independent journalist whose articles are published in 45 countries.

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

 
/News

Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
Traffic
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.