Donna Stephen

Same-sex marriages

2004-12-03 12:29

When I saw yesterday's news headlines about couple Marie Fourie and Cecelia Bonthuys being granted a verdict allowing them to marry legally, I wondered how much of an impact it would make on the public, really.

The Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that the common law definition of marriage to include same-sex marriage.

I knew two things though: First, that the African Christian Democratic Party would find a constitutional angle to justify their anti-gay leanings and that some group would slag the decision as infringing on the sanctity of marriage.

Which they did. They expressed "extreme disappointment" at the judgment. "The ruling does not alter our Judeo-Christian view that marriage should be between male and female," ACDP spokesperson Steve Swart stated.

Same-sex marriages 'unchristian'

What I didn't expect was the Anglican church to be the first institution to say about the ruling "same-sex marriages are unchristian".

It's bad PR for an institution who is trying to reform their image after their longstanding condemnation of gay clergy.

And, secondly, that there would be lots of references to that tired secular argument, often quoted by people who try to find an intellectual reason to justify their opinion against homosexual lifestyles, that it's unnatural.

The catholic church, by any measure is a bit of a dinosaur, and about once a year the pope gets around to mentioning that the church (or The Church) doesn't support same-sex marriages on the grounds that the homosexual lifestyle is a threat to the institution of the family. (I've even heard it phrased as 'the sanctity of the family'.)

In a 'civilised' country...

I would think that in a civilised country, which is the way I think of South Africa, issues such as this should be pass´. We should be beyond being judgemental about lifestyle - any lifestyle.

I see no social harm in embracing alternative lifestyles. As far as I'm concerned gay lifestyles don't even qualify as alternative. It's just the way things are. Some people are gay and some are not.

It's not as simple as that though. Homosexual people have been, and continue to be, the target of prejudice.

And there are a lot of legal and constitutional protections afforded the institution of marriage. Why two people who've built a life together over the last twelve years, couldn't legalise it up to now, amounts to definitions.

Because the bible says so

We define marriage in gender terms. It's the union of a man and a woman. Because the bible says so.

The bible also recommends a lot of other things like "thou should not covet thy neighbour's wife" and taxes aren't cool - but we manage to ignore those until it's convenient to find a justification for a personal prejudice.

The government is lukewarm about changing the definition - their biggest issue is it will involve the changing of wordings and definitions in an innumerable number of laws.

My interpretation of this is a) it's a lot of work, b)it's expensive to make all these changes and c) they're a little worried about embracing it too enthusiastically given the general public's surprisingly conservative viewpoint on the issue.

Frankly, I think that the common arguments used by most people against same-sex marriages are tired and without substance.

The decision was a purely legal one, but we know that where the Supreme Court goes on civil issues, the constitution is sure to follow.

SA constitution needs to be amended

The SA constitution will have to be amended to, as the Judge of Appeal Edwin Cameron recommended in his judgment, the definition of marriage reading: "Marriage is the union of two persons to the exclusion of all others for life."

If we can root out sexism and racial prejudice from old laws, it's a job which we're up to - it has to be done.

Our constitution is one of the most forward-thinking in the world and we should keep it that way by recognising these additional basic rights for gay couples.

  • Donna Stephen is editor of www.Women24.com and she thinks it's unchristian to tell people that they can't get married.

    Send your comments to Donna

    Disclaimer: News24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24.

    X
    NEXT ON NEWS24X

  • SHARE:

    24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

    Comment on this story
    0 comments
    Comments have been closed for this article.

    Inside News24

     
    /News

    Book flights

    Compare, Book, Fly

    Traffic Alerts
    Traffic
    There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
     
    English
    Afrikaans
    isiZulu

    Hello 

    Create Profile

    Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


    Please provide a username for your profile page:

    This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

    Settings

    Location Settings

    News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




    Facebook Sign-In

    Hi News addict,

    Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

    Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.