Johannesburg

Monday

Scattered showers. A mixture of sun and clouds. Mild.

14°C
25°C

7 day forecasts
Colleen Figg

'Where is the mercy?'

2009-05-08 11:05

Colleen Figg

I spent the entire day at a state hospital yesterday. I noticed a woman pushing a man in a wheelchair, every line of her posture defeated and hopeless, her face reflecting profound disillusionment with how life had turned out for her.

Her husband had lost one of his legs and was paralysed from the waist down. He sat, buckled over in his chair, unable to move under his own propulsion, unable even, to pull himself upright or get more comfortable in the chair.

As the hours passed I noticed she would periodically get behind him and haul him up; when she did this he emitted a groan filled with a pain that came from the spirit as well as the body.

In the end when I saw her preparing to lift him I would move out of earshot, for that low cry of desperation and defeat made me feel sad and helpless.

When they were not actively engaged in moving him or propping him up or taking him in to the doctor, they sat, the two, remote as strangers, tied by this bond of brutal illness that had become the third person in their marriage.

No freedom, no choices

They seemed to have nothing whatsoever to say to one another that did not pertain to the medical situation. Every now and then he would ask something and she would answer abruptly and impatiently. Then they would fall silent, each looking in the opposite direction, tired, bent and broken by a random card dealt by life.

Later I heard her saying she has to do this every week; bring him in for a check up, and for physiotherapy and every week the entire day is taken up with the process.

When they get home he is in so much pain from sitting in his wheelchair for so long she needs to give him medication to enable him to sleep. She never complained but her face said she expected nothing more from life that was decent, fair or enjoyable.

He would never walk again, she said; her life was narrowed, constricted, confined to caring for a man who himself took no more enjoyment from life than she; who had no freedom, no choices, no likelihood of improvement; rather a steady deterioration until he would bedridden, with a slow death to follow.

What is it about the human race, I wondered anew, that will sentence a man to suffer worse than an animal in the gutter, that will allow his life to be reduced to pain, suffering, inarticulate indignity, and still keep in effect a law that says we may not put him out of his misery?

What is our purpose?

Where is the mercy or dignity in allowing a life like that to carry on?

The people caring for him have lost all options in their own life, too; so we are not only affecting one man with this misplaced, ill-conceived law, we are affecting entire families, marriages, households, hospitals, until the fallout impacts on society at large not only economically but emotionally and psychologically, too.

There is something wickedly immoral about keeping such a system in place. If we are not truly our brother's keeper, then what is our purpose on this earth?

Send your comments to Colleen.

Disclaimer: News24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24.

- News24


meltonmark 5/8/2009 11:18:02 AM
Nice article. I like to think of myself as Christian. Some Christians seems to beleive that Euthansia is in opposition to God's Law. I fail to see how. What God is it that would let people suffer agonising and protracted deaths, with no hope of reprieve? It is the same mentality that denied vaccines, saying they were against God's will. [I do wish people wouldn't take it upon themselves to speak for God. He is quite capable of speaking for Himself when it is required.]

Ange Mc 5/8/2009 11:21:05 AM
We wouldn't do it to a dog...

Gemstone 5/8/2009 11:22:00 AM
It is for this very reason that I have a "living will", so that it can speak for me when I am unable to speak. Don't keep me alive on machines, let me go in peace

snoopy 5/8/2009 11:23:08 AM
Nice one, Colleen, I agree with you. The arguement against euthanasia is that it is 'playing god', but in many cases the person is being kept alive by machines in the first place. How is that not 'playing god'? Maybe my opinion will change when I am in the situation, but I certainly do not want a machine to breathe for me, or to beat my heart for me, or in any way keep me alive. If your body cannot do it alone any more, then your time has come. Put your house in order, and move on.

michael 5/8/2009 11:23:29 AM
Hey Colleen - do yourself a the best favour you can for yourself. Go out and buy a copy of "Mere Christianity",(C. S. Lewis) read it, digest it and have a debate about that. It helped me put arguments like this in perspective, although I do still wonder what I would do in those circumstances. We are seeing a lot going wrong in the world right now - just watch whats happening to our values right before our eyes, never mind the discipline. Look forward to your comment after you have read the book.

lloyd macklin 5/8/2009 11:24:03 AM
The "God" complex we, as humans, assume is the result of religious indoctrination and the cause of untold misery. Societies willingness to allow suffering in the name of 'human dignity' and the victims fear of death is a toxic combination. Take religion out of the equation and we are left with mans inate humanity.

cj 5/8/2009 11:28:58 AM
What right has anyone got to tell me whether or not I may choose to die? I hope and pray the day comes soon that our Government addresses the euthanasia issue and legalises it, for those of us who choose a dignified death and to be free of pain and suffering.

the_economist 5/8/2009 11:31:16 AM
but this column would have been more complete if we knew if the man in the wheelchair wanted to die.

Anonymous 5/8/2009 11:31:26 AM
Amen to that my dear. We have truly lost our sense of freedom to actually REALLY live our lives according to OUR choices. We are dictated by a system designed by man itself. Who gives another human being the right to another person's soul? We are driven by the choice to make a choice within LIMITS of course. We will never survive by the greed and competition that we carry out towards each other in this day and age.

VG 5/8/2009 11:33:49 AM
every adult has the right to refuse treatment. The fact that they keep going back shows that there is still hope - the doctors would have indicated if there was nothing more they could do for him.I agree with the idea of euthanasia, but its like the death penalty: fraught with issues

beans 5/8/2009 11:36:27 AM
the EXIT CLUB and get outta here

don't go there 5/8/2009 11:38:47 AM
So the great Steven Hawking should've been put down? You advocate the slaughter of the inconvenient, where is YOUR mercy, your humanity? A paralyzed man was lowered through the roof of a house by his friends hoping he'd be healed, how long do you think they'd been carrying him for? Its pure selfishness to begrudge helping the sick or needy, I've done it for others, it taught me to appreciate my life, how much better I can make someone else's life. Where there's life, there's hope. Shame on you!

lee 5/8/2009 11:49:01 AM
beautifully written column. very gentle and very true we should honour the human spirit in every journey it needs to make.

abraxas 5/8/2009 11:53:00 AM
Very well said Colleen.

Ali 5/8/2009 11:57:34 AM
I wouldn't let my dog suffer like that so it doesnt make sense to do that to another human. As someone who doesnt believe in religion I often wonder why I am governed by laws from a religion, Christianity,which I am not a member. There should be a complete separation between church and state so that people who dont believe in God can choose for themselves.

CTheB 5/8/2009 11:59:36 AM
Unfortunately it's because killing someone (even if it is their wish to die) is unacceptable to many because they consider murder only to be acceptable when it's in vengeance for committing a crime (aka the death penalty) as acceptable.

Vamp 5/8/2009 12:01:06 PM
Couldn't agree with you more.

George 5/8/2009 12:02:29 PM
Scarey too. This could easily lie ahead for any one of us !

Lenore 5/8/2009 12:03:10 PM
What if the person cannot tell you? My sister was born with Rett Syndrome, which is a neurological disorder. She couldn't speak or feed herself, or even walk. However, she had a very high quality of life, and my life would have been a greyer place without her in it.. Euthanasia can unfortunately lend itself to too many abuses, such as parents who don't want to be "jailed" by a downs syndrome or otherwise affected children/relatives.

EV 5/8/2009 12:03:36 PM
About 10 months ago I went through almost the same situation. My husband was almost crippled by arthritis and he often told me he was ready to go. When we were younger, we used to joke that, if the doctors could do nothing more for us, we should call in the vet. One morning he woke up in agony. It turned out to be a burst ulcer of which none of us was aware. He spent 6 weeks in the ICU and slowly deteriorated until only the morphine and respirator kept him alive ...

hwt 5/8/2009 12:05:20 PM
At what point do you decide on behalf of someone else that they should lose their life? Why wait until they are bed ridden, just pre-empt the inevitable and kill them before they are really sick, or God forbid, too much hassle to look after. Christ tells us to look after and protect those that can't defend themselves. So to counter your flawed reason, what has humanity come to that we are so willing to end somebody's else's life in the name of convenience, All life is precious, at all stages.

Phinah 5/8/2009 12:06:39 PM
Not a choice. How & who actually knows when a person is fully dead and may never recover? Suppose you will say trained professionals (Dr's), not a chance seeing that Schaik is also classified as knocking on hells'doors, and it does not look like that, is it? And anyway I am sure marriage vows, goes something like this "through sickness & health" so this is the part where we put those vows to practice.

christian 5/8/2009 12:08:28 PM
the greater the suffering on earth the greater reward in heaven.

ric 5/8/2009 12:08:56 PM
the same 'god' that allows people to die in agony in earthquakes, floods, from cancer, etc, etc.

VinChainSaw 5/8/2009 12:13:59 PM
This is one of the things that drove me away from the church and organised religion.

VinChainSaw 5/8/2009 12:16:36 PM
I've never understood how this can be illegal when, if that person had the capacity to move, they'd just pick up a gun or jump off a bridge. Archaic law and let's not bring Go into this as this law applies to everyone, not just the religious. If I don't even have control of my own life then what freedom do I really have?

VinChainSaw 5/8/2009 12:19:58 PM
Believe what you like but why should your beliefs be imposed on anybody else? You can choose not to accept euthansia because of religious beliefs but why should that apply to me?

Zelda 5/8/2009 12:28:05 PM
My opinion:Isn't our purpose just that, to care for each other, to make life a little more bearable. It's not for us to decide, but God can be the only judge on life and death..

Mike 5/8/2009 12:30:48 PM
Colleen - Who gives humanity the right to decide whether and when to end a life. You did not create this man, nor did you breathe life into his nostrils, so what gives either you or him the right to end his life. I can completely comprehend the suffering he must endure, but as to when it will end - only the Creator of heaven and earth can decide. Euthanasia is wrong!

Ali 5/8/2009 12:34:59 PM
That is the sickest, most ridiculous attitude I have ever heard. Another reason I am concerned that a lot of your so called 'religious laws' apply to the rest of us.

Spoonfeederxxx 5/8/2009 12:39:12 PM
I'm a big fan of choice... Choice is based on free will, which we all have... If the person doesn't want to live and would like to die humanely, why not? If the person is on a machine to stay alive, they are technically dead already, switching the plug from on to off is just solidifying that fact. Abortion, death penalty, euthanasia should be considered after all the facts and circumstances have...

johncp 5/8/2009 12:41:14 PM
This is not mercy. You quote the Bible (brother's keeper)- the very thing Cain asked after killing his brother!! Very ironic! You see great need and are moved to say: LETS KILL THE MAN!! Maybe if you or another NEIGHBOUR could help once a month, that would make a difference and be true mercy.

solo 5/8/2009 12:43:28 PM
If he were a dog his keeper would have him euthanazed.

For it 5/8/2009 12:46:36 PM
Very well written and i agree. You just have to look at countries like belgium and the netherlands who have legalised assisted suicide. This gives an option to people ie: to live in constant pain or to move on. All those people saying its wrong - i think you might disagree if it was you in constant pain. My gran died in agony and it was only because of current laws that we could do nothing for her.

Lacey Coombes 5/8/2009 12:49:36 PM
Many years ago a doctor in the Overberg helped his cancer-sufferer father ease out of his pain. He was found guilty of murder and sentenced to be detained until the rising of the court. How's that for a sensible judgment?

Miss Cellany 5/8/2009 12:50:07 PM
If this man lived in the depths of a thrid world country what chance would he have? The reason we have so much suffering is because machines do work that men used to do and science keeps those same unemployable dying people alive. Let nature do what it has to. The strong are being weakened by the upkeep of the weak. In nature this does not happen. Overpopulation lack of reserves results in death. SAD but real. Chain of life, why is man different?

cuba 5/8/2009 12:55:05 PM
EXCELLENT VIEWPOINT! that is the way forward, everyone makes their own decisions and are responsible for their own action. that type of viewpoint is referred to as 'libertarianism', and it is an awesome political/philosophical way to see the world

theDriver 5/8/2009 12:57:49 PM
People should have a choice when it comes to determining their lives, that is by no way playing god, only if you believe in god then you should suffer until death which is pointless really. I am sure even those who believe in god would wanna quickly move on to a "better" life...

rolling stone 5/8/2009 12:58:19 PM
Thanks to oppressive laws made by people almost a hundred years ago without any scientific merit, based only only religious views, we are in our current situation. You are not allowed to decide what to do with your life, what substances to imbibe, what religion to follow or who to marry, the list goes on.. Instead of becoming more enlightened, we are moving back to a secular society akin to the Amish, where every civil liberty is subversive if it does not fit the religious views. State and religion must be separated! When can we move forward and not backwards?

Jimmy Jackpot 5/8/2009 1:08:39 PM
Who's to decide whether the sick/suffering person wants to/should die? My wife and I cared for a terminally ill father for a year, and there were times when he wanted to die. There were also better days. Ultimately, he passed away in 2007, but that year, while not the most fun I've ever had, was definitely one of the most enriching times in my life, during which I learnt a lot about the human spirit. I suppose it depends on individual circumstances.

Duan 5/8/2009 1:08:57 PM
I read that most opinions in the comments are about you deciding to end your own life. What of people being made to feel that they are a burden? Would that still be you deciding to take your own or would that then be murder? Do you end your life because you are tired or because the people around you are tired?

Scotty 5/8/2009 1:10:23 PM
Really?? and what if there is no heaven?

faithless 5/8/2009 1:18:53 PM
so afraid of death? It is inevitable and should be embraced just as birth is. If everyone was as religious as they purport to be then there should be no fear of death (unless you a sinful Christian...then you screwed). Anywho freedom of choice...give our elders some dignity. For once a decent column Collen.

Robert 5/8/2009 1:18:54 PM
by allowing euthanasia we would also allow for a lot of "dodgy" dealings. While these would be a very small percentage no doubt it does still leave other problematic areas. I guess we should all be offered that form that we should be able to tick... much like the organ donor option. Unless this was signed some time before hand, it should never be entertained as an option.

bonny 5/8/2009 1:22:35 PM
I so totally agree with you. Remember the ruckus a few years back about the woman in the States who had been in a coma for 15 or twenty years..her poor husband had no life of his own for all that time. Her parents refused to allow her feeding tube to be removed. Even idiot Bush got involved..finally someone saw sense and she was allowed to die.

Hendrik 5/8/2009 1:23:06 PM
I agree. Today you won't be able to afford this medical costs, you won't see your children with the hope that they will take care of you. You will leave your spouse in difficult financial position - after all, she/he will be the one staying behind with all the problems. So I say, if there are no hope at all in recovering and if it is your choice, it is your choice - grant it. What is worst - live in pain for the next 10 years with financial problems hanging over you or dying in peace?

Linda 5/8/2009 1:27:08 PM
Nice article, I can relate how the woman felt,I nursed my dad for 2 weeks, you do not know how the carer is feeling unless you have walked in their shoes, he dad was in a state hospital in a coma, and they never bothered about him, it drains you emotionally,physically and mentally. He passed away eventually and I cannot tell you how relieved I was. I still miss him but I have good memories of him when he was healthy.

Hendrik 5/8/2009 1:29:39 PM
Everyday one murders another one - for his cellphone. Now I don't understand this. That is fine. Everybody complaining about violence but nobody is doing anything about it. But if I want to die because it is my choice, then that is against the law. I'm dying anyway - what difference will 5 days make - atleast it will save my spouse some money in hostpital costs, etc.

Bonny 5/8/2009 1:30:42 PM
so if you suffer for years with some dread disease before popping off in extreme agony, do you get a bigger, fluffier cloud than everyone else??

GT 5/8/2009 1:31:31 PM
Isn't it ironic that the pro-life, anti euthanasia religious types are also the ones screaming for the death penalty. It is none of your business so get the F-ck out the way and let grown ups make their own decisions about their own lives. Terry Shiavo in the USA is the ultimate example of Christian fundamentalist sticking their dirty paws on something that had nothing to do with them. Even the last Pope wanted death over machines

Chris 5/8/2009 1:36:27 PM
To "don't go there", you seem to think that the idea is for someone else to decide who lives or dies, that is not the case here. If I was in the same condition, I would beg a doctor for a lethal injection, failing that I would take the gun myself.... It's my choice

Ron 5/8/2009 1:38:10 PM
Where is your so called loving GOD when children are raped, mutilated, cut up for body parts etc or is that the greater suffering crap from "christian". If your God was so loving of his creations why does he allow such horrendous acts to take place - I was brought up in both a Catholic and Anglican society and I'm ashamed at the way Christiaans always act conveniently holier than though. Christianity has a sick and evil history far far worse than proposed euthanasia. God gave us free choice!

J 5/8/2009 1:40:09 PM
Hopefully you get put in his position, so some idiotic online columnist can decide your fate.

Love Africa 5/8/2009 1:44:11 PM
To do the humain thing is put an animal out of its misery when nothing can be done. But because of insurance and other reasons to put a human out of hes/her misery can't be done. Its a silly law.

Anton 5/8/2009 1:50:16 PM
Are you suggesting that we, the "healthy" decide when another "the sick" has to let go of life? What if that person in the wheelchair wants to live and desperately clings to life....shall we decide on his behalf that its time to go? If we accept that principle we in principle give others the right to decide on our behalf when its time for us to leave and tomorrow you can be sure other reasons will be found to encourage people to pass on... like having reached the age of 55 for instance etc

veeman 5/8/2009 1:55:12 PM
My next-door neighbour here in cape town, has a daughter who got polio at a very young age and never got to walk or talk , she just emits grunts .The father is now a pensioner and has been looking after the child . It is not everyone who supports euthanasia . This father is happy to look after the child and wouldn't wish for anything else . It is important to view this problem from all angles , maybe this woman needs help for her husband rather than euthanasia.

Ram Nagel 5/8/2009 2:00:32 PM
Remove religion from this agonizing equation and there is no problem with euthanasia. Religion is the problem here in that it convinces otherwise kind and humane people to be cruel and heartless because they have been indoctrinated into believing an unsupported supernatural claim: that there is a thing called "God" and that it requires this sort of suffering which, being indefensible by common-place logic and decent moral arguments, must be justified with an appeal to ignorance, "We mere humans just cannot fathom God's alleged purpose!" This appeal to ignornance is better known under its other name: religious faith. This moral situation is simple to resolve if one has compassion, respects another's sovereign right over their own life and quality thereof. A child can solve this moral "problem." But faith - believing without knowing, without evidence, or even in the teeth of contradictory evidence - muddies the waters here and promotes suffering and immoral behaviour. The vast, vast majority of people (if not all) who would lobby to take away other people's right to a dignified death, are religious. Frankly, I don't see why religious people should have a say in regulating other people's lives and deaths. They should keep to themselves and not impose their values on society as a whole. Not everybody believes what they believe or should be constrained by their unfounded superstitions. Remember, euthanasia is not about putting other people down, it is about people of sound mind making their own uncoerced choice for a dignified death - so legalizing euthanasia would not allow people to kill other people, or Downe's syndrome children. Living wills are a good way to make one's wishes known before one becomes incapable of making a free choice.

Christian 5/8/2009 2:10:32 PM
is a very tricky subject, If we legalize Euthanasia, we run the risk of allowing people to legally murder family members for gain. As a Christian, the Bible (as I read it) does not clearly state that Euthanasia is a Sin, it does say that murder is a Sin, I.e. killing for pleasure or gain. I therefore believe that where a person is terminally ill and has made a clear desire to be allowed to die with dignity that some form of Euthanasia may be allowed, after applying to the proper authorities. Complete freedom of choice must be allowed and there can not be any pressure applied. May God bless you all.

liesl 5/8/2009 2:15:12 PM
There is different forms of euthanasia Active and Passive, passive would be when machine keeps you alive and the decision is made to switched them off. Personally I do not have a problem with the passive kind as I myself would not like to be kept alive (at a cost to my loved ones). Active Euthanasia is not that easy as I believe there is circumstances where it would be acceptable but the problem is who decides those circumstances and based on what rules, leaving it open to abuse. All live is precious and should be preserved as long as it is humanly possible.

Piet Strydom 5/8/2009 2:17:29 PM
Most complaining about "Christianity's rules" complain very selectively. They don't want their stuff stolen, lives taken, don't want other people to intrude into their lives. But they want to live in a way that intrudes into other peoples' lives. You can either accept God's laws for your life, or you have no right to complain about other peoples' behaviour, whether they fly areoplanes into a building, or rob you in your house. At a fundamental level, that's the only choice.

singularity 5/8/2009 2:24:15 PM
If you can show me one place in nature where animals choose euthanasia I would agree with you but until then it's unspeakable heresy! Oh wait... scorpions do it. Sorry, euthanasia rules.

michael 5/8/2009 2:45:42 PM
There is quite a lot of vitriol against Christianty and religion going on here. MOST of which is very uninformed. Rolling Stone asks "when can we move and not backwards"? According to most worldviews we have been moving forwards every time we move away from obeying God! And just look where it has got us. Another great read is a book by Philip Yancey called Soul Survivor.In it he describes how he survived the Church and remained a Christian.Criticize Christianity when you have done your research!!

A lifer 5/8/2009 2:46:30 PM
I know all about this. Having to had to watch my own mother die slowly and in extreme pain as she just faded to crumbling bones and skin. in the most unbelieve pain. I believe that God does not what us to activley kill someone, but relieve their suffing, let them die with diginty. And what of the pain of the loved ones as you stand by helpless and someone who means the world to you suffer and fades more and more away from you. No pain Killer for that. no relief.

Ashlin 5/8/2009 2:48:38 PM
shame on you life is the most precious gift given to us and the very thing that makes us human is the will we have to survive and make better its not your choice or even the person effected by theese wild cards that life has thrown them but the choice of GOD who had given the life so please all you people that aggree to put anyone of their suffering are a disgrace to humanity and should go and end ur lifes as im sure u lifeless beings dont have the will and hope that the rest of humanity carries

Busi 5/8/2009 2:50:39 PM
Would it be OKAY to use Euthanasia on them? I can see the rich killing their own left, right & centre, while the poor are forced to take care of their terminally ill because the poor CANNOT afford a lawyer to represent their case in court!

Suicide 5/8/2009 2:51:07 PM
If you realy want to die, surely you can take an overdose of sleeping pills / pain killers and down it with a bottle of wiskey?

Ashlin 5/8/2009 2:54:59 PM
Well said JOHNCP why not encourage and help the ill instead of cheaply taking the easy way out of putting them down.the views of the people who are pro euthanasia show exactly why the world has turned this way so full of hate how dare you call that Mercy shame on you colleen you spent the time thinking of the mans pain did u ever think of helping him in whatever way u could its a disgrace the way people think and by the way i have only seen 25years of my life so far and will fight all pain 2d end

Piet Strydom 5/8/2009 2:55:17 PM
Many a big lie has been told in the name of Christianity. If you did not accept Christ as you personal saviour, you will not get into heaven when you die, no matter how much you suffered.

Napier 5/8/2009 3:02:04 PM
As a sufferer of MS, I believe in assisted suicide and belong to the Living Will Society. Could not agree with you more.

Piet Strydom 5/8/2009 3:04:13 PM
To Ram Nagel: Any decent philosopher will tell you that there is no such thing as "morality". It has no framework to stand on. You either go for sophistic truth, i.e. everyone decides for himself, or you go for religious truth, i.e. God decides for you. And if you refuse God's truth, you may not complain if somebody fly a plane into a building, take your car, or has some fun with your daughter. Because by taking the right to decide for yourself, you MUST grant that right to others. Fair is fair?

inside news24

Cpt: 14-17°C Showery. Mostly cloudy. Mild. Pta: 18-28°C A few showers. Afternoon clouds. Mild.
Jhb: 14-25°C Scattered showers. A mixture of sun and clouds. Mild. Bloem: 14-25°C Rain early. Morning clouds. Mild.
Dbn: 19-31°C Rain late. Afternoon clouds. Warm. PE: 14-21°C Numerous showers. Partly sunny. Mild.
7 day forecasts...
Western Cape Eastern Cape Kwazulu Natal Gauteng

Germiston - 18:42:48 PM The bridge over the N12 Highway is closed for roadworks until 17th January 2010 - traffic is being re-routed to cross the Highway via the Sam Green Street bridge or the Kraft Road Interchange More traffic reports...

Here are the winning Lotto numbers from the Saturday, November 7 draw.

18, 24, 25, 31, 35, 42 Bonus 38

Lotto plus: 4, 14, 17, 20, 21, 34 Bonus 3

SMS the word Lotto to 31222 to get lotto numbers sent directly to your phone. The service costs just R10 per month. 
More lotto numbers...

Jobs - Find your dream job

Information Security Officer

Gauteng
Evrst Business Solutions

Network Administrator

Gauteng
Evrst Business Solutions

Stratus Developer

Gauteng
Evrst Business Solutions

Cars - Search 1000's of new and used cars

AUDI

2008 A4 1.8T Multitronics from R 269 000

MITSUBISHI

Colt 2800 TDi D-Cab Rodeo Dsl
2004
R 129,990.00

VOLKSWAGEN

Polo 1.4 Trendline 5-dr MY05
2009
R 175,281.00

MITSUBISHI

Colt 2800 TD Rodeo D-Cab Dsl PU MY06
2006
R 169,990.00

Property - Find a new home

COLBYN

Single Residential R2,700,000

SANDTON

Single Residential R2,450,000

ATLANTIC BEACH GOLF ESTATE

Single Residential R15,750,000

Travel - Look, Book, Go!

Free Games - TOO MUCH NEWS? TAKE A BREAK!