Set your location:

News24 User

Spiting the Springbok

by
2008-11-19 11:01

Brandon Faber, News24 User

I know it's unusual to be subjected to my mindless ranting twice a week - but I just have one more question for you before I hand myself over to the men in white suits.

"Why should the Springbok emblem be moved to the right of the jersey to make way for the Protea on the left - but it's okay for Bafana-Bafana to put our national flower on the right, in favour of the SA Football Association logo on the left?"

Any takers? Any clear answers that will not spiral down the usual abyss of misery, misunderstanding and racial insult?

I didn't think so.

Pop around to your nearest sports apparel store if you don't believe me, or simply go here for a photograph of the latest Bafana jersey.

Yebo yes, 'tis the truth as I've told it. Now I am all for the greater accommodation of the King Protea, even if its sole purpose is to get the Watson family to take hands full of Prozac and chill in the corner. But I am even more in favour of fair play.

"What's good for the goose" and so on, don't you agree? Equality and all that. Lovely concepts we bandy about under the rainbow... when it's to our advantage, of course.

Anyway, I hope that some or other person in power - and of some backbone - has the balls to press Mike "the emblem is mine" Stofile on this issue. If the left-hand-side is the flavour du jour for the national sports emblem then it must go on the left of the Bafana-Bafana jersey too. Period.

No exceptions Captain Mike - that is mos fair and will I, in a magnanimous show of solidarity and faith in the fairness of South African politics, go and purchase both jerseys the soonest they are available with the King Protea in its rightful place.

While we are on the subject I think it imperative that we immediately investigate the apparel design of other sporting codes too.

I am willing to bet three nonsensical racial insults and a drive-by-shooting that not everybody is toeing the line. When last have we taken a good long look at the National underwater aerobics squad's outfits? What about polo, chess, karate and the like? Hell, I think this warrants a full investigation of everything - including jukskei and bokdrol-spitting.

Bokdrol-spitting (by the way) is when you take some animal dung (often Kudu), roll it around in your mouth and see who can spit it the furthest. Apparently the sport is big at some festivals around the country... there is even a World Championship held each year.

Anyway, I must admit that I don't care much for bokdrol-spitting. As long as the country's leading "spitter" does it wearing something that sports the Protea on the heart, I am a happy man.

Ecstatic even.

Get published on News24 by sending your article, story or column to us

See who has had a say on News24.

Disclaimer: News24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of users published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24. News24 editors reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received.

Rate this story:

Oom_Kosie 11/19/2008 11:18:49 AM
Nice to have pointed it out. Bafana-Bafana, because you have your emblems on the wrong side, you are evil! That's basically what our hard-working Minister of Sport has said, isn't it? It seems he doesn't know much about sporting apparel, as he also did not know that England uses different emblems for different sports. Bahaha! As you don't much care for bokdrol-spoeg I don't much care for rugby. I do think that government meddling in ANY sport or (harmless) recreational activity is unacceptable.

SPRINBOK 11/19/2008 11:27:57 AM
Why waste time talking about things that are useless to people. There are millions of issues around the country which needs attention and the space and opportunity you used to write this massage. People are starving out there, dnt you ever think of addressing that issue and let people comment on it. Use the power of the media to good use not talk about useless revenge things that will last for as long as people of this world exist.

cuba 11/19/2008 11:28:50 AM
brilliant as always brandon

CK 11/19/2008 11:32:30 AM
Well said Brandon. What channel is the bok-droll spitting on I'll much rather watch that than Protea Rugby regardless of which side the protea's on.

Johan 11/19/2008 11:32:39 AM
Stupid politicians,they just immortilised the bok.The anc goverment did not learn from the old apartheid system now did they.Lesson nr 1,never ever try and oppress anything,it only makes the will of the poeple stronger!!Boks forever!!

20 sumthing yr old white boy 11/19/2008 11:33:07 AM
Whats good for one MUST only be good for the other. Nice article, good points. But this is typical of our current regime, confusion reigns no matter which way you turn with our wonderful guvment. There is no sense in anything they do, no consistency whatsoever... Woza 2009 elections, hamba ANC!!!

DWP 11/19/2008 11:33:44 AM
Dude, it depends if you wearing the jersey or not! If you are wearing the bafana jersey the protea is on the right! Isn't this gonna be the same as the new rugby jersey?? Not sure!

boela1 11/19/2008 11:34:32 AM
Brandon , well done but, now I know why Bananna Bannana plays with no Heart , Rugby might go the same road as all other sport codes. our nasional Deer will always stay the "SpringBok " Viva Springbokke 2 times WORLD CUP HOLDERS , try and beat that with a flower on your heart Never

Juanita 11/19/2008 11:35:28 AM
Yes! I love it! At last someone with sense.

Pete 11/19/2008 11:36:55 AM
Please Brandon, at this moment someone in SA is being killed or raped. Don't you think your obvious talent can be put to more significant use addressing real issues?

Tezz 11/19/2008 11:37:11 AM
We have got to be the only nation on the planet that is more concerned about been politically correct in sport, rather than winning. Moving a emblem might make the likes of Mike Stofile happy, but I've got news for him, the country as a whole, black or white, doesn't give a continental, all we want is for our teams to win. Stop worrying about road name changes and emblem postions, focus on doing things that actually benefit everyone, at the moment you're just wasting everyone's time and monef

GT 11/19/2008 11:37:48 AM
Reverend Stofile - the ultimate example of why religion should not come near politics! I am of the opinion that sports teams represent their country, not an emblem.

David 11/19/2008 11:38:20 AM
The coach for our soccer squad does not even have to be able to speak any of our official languages nevermind being a person of colour but the couch for the Springboks was appointed based on that criteria. As puke watson has shown us. It is not about what is best for the sport. I am finished with SA sport. It is becoming a joke.

Gazza 11/19/2008 11:38:36 AM
Hey there Brandon, A humorous, but fair and square article! Your logic is very logical (ha!), but obviously escapes Mike and the gang. Supporters should just stop buying Bok apparel - all apparel, and we'll then see if SARU can deduce any logic in the drop in sales.

Chris G 11/19/2008 11:38:50 AM
Does anyone even watch Bafana play? I doubt anyone would even notice if they moved the emblem to the left. The only reason they target rugby is because they're jealous.

Bruinman 11/19/2008 11:41:00 AM
Why does the rugby jersey get 2 symbols? Is rugby special? The other sport codes get only one.

Mark 11/19/2008 11:41:16 AM
There is no equality in this country. The Luke Watson debacle is a clear indication of that. It's not ok for Markgraaf to say the "K" word(Which I agree with), but it's ok to insult afrikaners by calling them Dutchmen. Same with Bafana, they are an embaressment to our sport yet they seem to do what they want when they want, and have different rules too. This article is a good illustration of that.

The Truth 11/19/2008 11:42:17 AM
It was actually Minister of Sport,"Reverend" Makhenkesi Stofile who claimed that the Bok belongs to the government,not his little boetie Mike.Mike's out of the picture (for the time being at least) after losing the elections for SARU president.A-holeism must run in the Stofile family.

cj 11/19/2008 11:43:37 AM
Mike Stofile has obtained the rights to the drol as well, he's apparently got the rights to everything else? Gives new meaning to the term "soos 'n brommer om 'n drol".

Pangea 11/19/2008 11:45:18 AM
I cannot understand South Africans. I do not watch rugby as I believe it is a bunch of mindless Neanderthals running after a odd shaped ball. If you are unhappy with the emblem issue then show it by boycotting the next springbok game in South Africa.

Tebza 11/19/2008 11:45:24 AM
I fail to understand why majority of white people are in support of the springbok emblem. It could be that a lot of them understand what this animal stand for. We all know who gave the national rugby team this nickname. The idea was to recognise the team as a white?s only team now you still find people whining and crying over this resist emblem. Everyone please read this line, it will take us at least 50 years before we become an integrated society whether we like it or not, the springbok emblem is a proof of how resist some white people still are. Black Free Starter.

zane 11/19/2008 11:45:58 AM
hahahaha... brilliant observation..

Johan 11/19/2008 11:48:21 AM
I personally agree that what is good for SA Rugby must be good for SA Soccer. The problem is simply that the Soccer Bosses have more balls then the Rigby Bosses. If you remember, a couple of years ago the Sports Portfolio Committee also had their knife in for soccer but were quickly told to move on as they had no say in SA Soccer, and funny enough, they did. So they moved onto rugby, and what did they get, a couple of plebs bended over and ready to be ?. you know what I mean. It?s a sad day for rugby but even a sadder day for us all, because we all are so accommodating to be politically correct that we don?t even have the guts to stand up and fight for what we believe in or what we know is right

Johan 11/19/2008 11:49:44 AM
I personally agree that what is good for SA Rugby must be good for SA Soccer. The problem is simply that the Soccer Bosses have more balls then the Rigby Bosses. If you remember, a couple of years ago the Sports Portfolio Committee also had their knife in for soccer but were quickly told to move on as they had no say in SA Soccer, and funny enough, they did. So they moved onto rugby, and what did they get, a couple of plebs bended over and ready to be ?. you know what I mean. It?s a sad day for rugby but even a sadder day for us all, because we all are so accommodating to be politically correct that we don?t even have the guts to stand up and fight for what we believe in or what we know is right

Shaz 11/19/2008 11:51:03 AM
It was a hard fight just so we can retain the springbok emblem in the first place. Lets just leave the petty debate of where it must go. I am left handed and don't give two if its left or right as long its there. And if all sports jerseys of all sports carry the protea in addition, so be it! And that I also don't care where it should be...as long as all emblems is all visible.

David Wayne 11/19/2008 11:52:09 AM
Well spotted, well written. Makes you realise how politicians work to divide and conquer!!

Shaun 11/19/2008 11:52:20 AM
If the Springbok is so sacred, stand together do not buy clothing flags etc(dont wave the current bok flag you will be crucified in the press)do not go to game venues. if you dont do that shut up and accept the birth of the "flowers"

Johan 11/19/2008 11:53:37 AM
Stupid politicians,they just immortilised the bok.The anc goverment did not learn from the old apartheid system now did they.Lesson nr 1,never ever try and oppress anything,it only makes the will of the poeple stronger!!Boks forever!!

Joe333 11/19/2008 11:54:32 AM
Good article Brandon! I believe that a new law will be passed soon that will govern the emblems of all national sports teams. This just shows how far the politicians will go to control all aspects of our lives. Seeing that Stofile and his gang have not managed to improve the performances of our sports men and women one iota, I guess that he is striving for something to be remembered by!

Tsotsi 11/19/2008 11:55:02 AM
Breaking down the strength of the Springbok would never elevate the strength of Bafana. But by now we all know that all that the powers to be are good for (sic?) are changing names etc. Never learned to do anything constructive! Like viva Malema...?!

Twiggz 11/19/2008 11:55:08 AM
Encore! Encore! We want more! We want more!

tired 11/19/2008 11:55:42 AM
Because the main reason for this latest charade has got nothing to do with reconciliation. It's all about flexing muscles and spiting the South African Rugby public, who is perceived to be white and racist.That's the same force behind name changes.The average black man in Pretoria does not give a hoot about the name of the city, but the ANC has invented the issue mainly to irritate Afrikaners.Government is so set on spiting whites and dividing South Africans, that the real issues go unattended

The Truth 11/19/2008 11:56:34 AM
so I guess it's bye-bye to Lukey,unless he wants to break his precious "Born Again" principles by no longer feeling an overwhelming need to puke on the jersey,or refer to his teammates as Dutchmen.He could of course always enter the priesthood as he does seem to enjoy preaching his political and religious beliefs to anyone who wants to listen.

20 sumthing yr old white boy 11/19/2008 11:57:37 AM
Whats good for one MUST only be good for the other. Nice article, good points. But this is typical of our current regime, confusion reigns no matter which way you turn with our wonderful guvment. There is no sense in anything they do, no consistency whatsoever... Woza 2009 elections, hamba ANC!!!

Karen 11/19/2008 12:01:46 PM
The last time I saw a bokdrol-spitting contest, the contestants, audience, commentators etc were all white afrikaners. We must definitely get the ANC to look into this!!! We need transformation happening in bokdrol-spitting as well. I don't know how this national sport has been so overlooked, but now that it has been highlighted I am sure it will receive the attention it deserves.

Kevin 11/19/2008 12:03:00 PM
It has no bearing at all really. Maybe you should use your time and energy doing constructive meaningfull things and stop worrying about trivial matters. I am a rugby fan of note and I will still support the boys regardless.If Bafana moved their logo would you support them? No - you will support them if they play good footie.

Deon 11/19/2008 12:04:27 PM
I nominate you for the Minister of Sport !!!!! it's actually such an easy issue to resolve...... well done on your appointment

jonathan 11/19/2008 12:04:33 PM
I see now that Puke is happy to play for the jersey that he so despises...as long as the reviled bokkie is not on the left chest. Also, presumably, by moving the hated animal eight to ten inches to the right, is it now safe to assume that it is no longer a symbol of oppression or past injustices? As easy as that, huh? Everything's OK now, Mike? Puke? Anyone?

dh 11/19/2008 12:05:07 PM
The debate on the bok emblem is already tired and old; shouldn't all those who were so upset that it might go be happy, instead of complaining about a small detail? OK, maybe to some it's a bigger deal and I just don't get it, but really, changes in style of sporting uniforms, etc, take place often, don't they? I understand the point you are trying to make, but even if I'd noticed, I really wouldn't have thought so very hard about it. It's alarming sometimes how South Africans complain non-stop!

Kolkas 11/19/2008 12:05:13 PM
I watched the news last night. Our Minister of Sport clearly said that every single national sports team in the world wears the national sports emblem on the left of the jersey. So, Bafana Bafana will have to change it and thats that. I think that Saru and Minister Mike made the right decision though and I am glad that all of this is over.

Bafana Bafana 11/19/2008 12:05:59 PM
Thats not the current Bafana shirt. Well done on the article research for your argument!

Blade 11/19/2008 12:06:29 PM
Boycott the next game, then Strffies and his boys can go and sit in the stadiums, then well see where they generate their income from. The springbok belongs to the fans not to the politicians !!!!!!!!! Viava bokke??..

Johann 11/19/2008 12:06:50 PM
Guys that is the SAFA logo on the shirt and not the Bafana logo!! The Bafana logo is 2 stars running next to each other!! So before you all complain about the Bok jumping to the right, get your facts straight!! Besides who cares if they are called the Zumbucks, let's just keep on winning!

Mojojo 11/19/2008 12:10:18 PM
So when they sing the National Anthem, they put their hands over their hearts and the SA Football Association logo? Well its simple, either they sing the national anthem and move the national logo, or they leave their shirts as is and sing the SAFA anthem.

Nick 11/19/2008 12:11:00 PM
Do the research before posting about something you know nothing about! In 1939 the South African Coloured Rugby Board first chose a national team. It had hopes of touring overseas. Any possibility of this was thwarted by World War II.The team was known as the Springboks. The blazer badge had a leaping Springbok above a rugby ball. In 1935 the South African Bantu Rugby Board had been formed. When the South African Bantu Rugby Board first chose a national team in 1950 to play against the Coloured Springboks, they called their players Springboks and when they devised a badge it has a springbok leaping through the map of Africa.

EmTee 11/19/2008 12:12:34 PM
Thanks Brandon...something to brighten up my day. Tis true, what's good for the goose is good for the gander. But somehow I keep getting the impression that inconsistency in decision making is the order of the day for politicians and administrators in SA.

J.O 11/19/2008 12:14:58 PM
But please remember that the Coloured team played as the "Coloured Springboks" from as early as 1939. The Bantu rugby, later to become SARU, were also known as the Springboks, with a Springbok as logo. They were not affiliated with the then white rugby unions, so were free to choose as name and emblem whatever they wanted to. Look for photos of all the well-known administrators of today of colour, all wearing Springbok colours - out of their own free will!!! Learn some history boet!

GeePmb 11/19/2008 12:15:14 PM
Good points! However, football is a law unto itself anyway in SA and Stofile and his ilk have it in for the rugby fraternity, mainy because it is the ONLY South Africa team sport that actualy is world class. Perish the thought that a predominantly white team are the current world champions!!

VLS 11/19/2008 12:15:37 PM
What a ridiculous article. Notwithstanding the fact that the kit you post a link for isn't even the current one, it goes without saying that SAFA would move their emblem in any case. So what's the debate? Double-standards? Hardly. A certain racial group clinging to a national sport and a silly symbol as if its their own on the other hand just shows ignorance and bigotry.

Jim 11/19/2008 12:18:00 PM
Seeing as we already have a protea on the jersey I fail to see why we should have any more discussion on the subject. The English rugby jersey is adorned by a red rose, while both their soccer and cricket teams sport three sleeping lions, as opposed to a wide awake rampant lion for the Scots. What does the emblem matter? It is the winning culture and history of the Springbok that is important. Luke, Mike & friends, please go and play mud castles on the moon and leave SA Rugby alone.

smokey-smurf 11/19/2008 12:19:28 PM
The name Springbok was first used in 1906. We weren't even a union back then. Everything before that you can pin on our British overlords.

Lefty 11/19/2008 12:21:49 PM
You have a point and if you are any smart maybe you will raise this issue with the right people instead of initiating a racial difference that some of us are not interested, and I can promise you if you do raise it won't even be a big issue it will be change with no hustles.

Dries 11/19/2008 12:23:36 PM
Great article, again! The whole issue is not with the Springbok, it is just part of the populist attack on whites in SA. To get votes a minority becomes the common enemy. Why do you think the kangastalking showerman accused COPE of marying the DA? When there where many other parties without white leaders to choose from?

John 11/19/2008 12:23:36 PM
Cantebury, the suppliers of the jersey, plus a big sponsor of the Springboks would like to know where their logo is going to go. It currently occupies the right side. The middle is taken up by Sasol and Cantebury are not prepared to compromise in terms of the size of their logo. Apparently this is unlikely to be resolved before the Lions get here. As usual SARU have made a decision with no due diligence being done.

Andre 11/19/2008 12:25:32 PM
How true hey , they only tarketing the rugby in this country. Why don't they work together and find solutions for other things that realy need attention in this country. Still can't believe the Springbok, a little animal that's so happy in the fields can be blamed for the apartheid days. People still think apartheid will come back and it will never come back again. Goverment leave sports alone , work things that realy need you attention , help kids from the streets , help feed the hungery.

OB1 11/19/2008 12:26:57 PM
but I think for the sake of peace the current compromise is suitable for all interested parties. Rugby supporters still get to keep the beloved bok name and logo, and I don't think anyone has any problems accomodating the king protea, they never did. I think the burning issue was about doing away with the bok, that is no longer the case so I'm happy. Bokke forever!

Simon Riekert 11/19/2008 12:27:08 PM
I have submitted a personal motivation to Oregan Hoskins per e-mail regarding the retention of the Bok as national rugby emblem. Funny enough, I have not heard from him since... I should remind him with this new piece of disclosure. Watch this space...

Hibs 11/19/2008 12:32:48 PM
An excellent point, Sir! Well spotted on the Bafana logo! BTW, Spitting a kudu-drol is hard, they'renot small. By sheer coincidence, mos such bokdrol spitting contests use SPRINGBOK-drolle! How's that for proof that the Springbok should sta on the left...

Jah-man 11/19/2008 12:37:17 PM
Bokdrol spitting! Damm, is there really sport in spitting some Kudu dung? I must agree with you on the fairness matter.Those in power must seen to it that all the differnt codes from Bokdroll spitting teams to the juskskei team, the whole bundle must have the same codes at the same spot. Even our junior teams from school levels jerseys be included. By the way who is the captain of the Bokdroll Team SA?

prada 11/19/2008 12:37:37 PM
Thats definately not the latest jersey ! The new one has 10 inch lettering blazon across the chest in bold black letters - " LOSER"

Brandon 11/19/2008 12:38:05 PM
but I mos said its the SAFA logo. As for you BAFANA BAFANA... is this then the new shirt? http://sasportswear.co.za/images/sportswear/bafana_bafana_2008_%20home_kit.jpg Still has the protea on the right captain.

Johann Eksteen 11/19/2008 12:41:36 PM
Think about it! (1) It's a legal form of protest, (2) It will save you loads of money, (3) Unlike the general election whites will be able to make a difference to the way SA (and its sport) is being run, (4) results to our efforts will be seen in less than two months, and (5) we can sock it to p**pols like Stofile and Watson. Viva boycott, viva!!!!

D 11/19/2008 12:57:09 PM
Everyone is missing the point, the Springbok emblem is deeply embedded in the roots of the old regime, with Doc Craven having said that no black person will play for the springboks, Why should blacks condone even playing with an emblem having such negative coonotation to the majority of the population??People have been indoctrinated under the old regime. Open your eyes and ears and think!!!The idiot writing this article, I pray for you and all your negativity.

Hein 11/19/2008 12:57:33 PM
Brandon, whilst watching the 7pm news last night, the same question popped into my mind. If this is for the sake of national sports consistency, why aren't we hearing about this being implemented across the board (rugby, soccer, netball, athletics, etc. etc.)? However, something tells me that this article of yours is going to spawn the usual racial mud-slinging.

Johann 11/19/2008 12:59:04 PM
That's my question Brandon, does it matter whether it is on the left or right? You guys are doing exactly what government is doing with name changes! The fact is: The Springbok is staying! So who cares about the rest! I certainly don't! The All Blacks have a silver fern - and are called the ABs, their cricket team has a Silver Fern, yet are known as the Black Caps! You lot are making more of this than it should be! rather focus on important things!! The team will still be the Springboks!

Mark T 11/19/2008 1:02:13 PM
As long as all sports codes have the same rules regarding the emblem, then all is righ. However, I think Rugby is picked on as it is the one that can be used for political means easier than the others because they are known as the boks.

King of France 11/19/2008 1:02:36 PM
Were you around that day in 1906? Were you standing there when the SA Rugby team was asked what they would like to be called? NO boet, you weren't. Your father was still in dad's bag, so you don't know what the Springbok stands for. If anything, the world knows the Bok as being a strong icon, and an opponent that will be very hard to defeat. So stop and think where you heard what the Bok stands for. Yes, I AM white.

Lance 11/19/2008 1:26:58 PM
You are a bokdrol. Say what you mean, have the balls. Everyone knows this whole emblem saga is racially motivated. Mike (nothing else to bloody do) Stofile, get a life.

Ali Germishuys 11/19/2008 1:56:46 PM
Nice article Brandon, great wit. The most important point here is that the Springbok is still on the jersey, meaining that Puke will not wear it! The only emblem he deserves to play under is the snake.

GailC 11/19/2008 2:00:45 PM
I don't like rugby so in reality it makes no difference to me but I really think if they had to choose a national flower it should be one like the Aloe which is representaive of our flag and mentality. Bitterness is there, thorn are there for persecution, red/orange is there for blood and fire. Symbolism is more tough and hard and it also could represnt healing.

The Prophet 11/19/2008 2:18:25 PM
I've been a supporter of Australian cricket now since before SA's readmission - no politics. I'm going the same way regarding rugby now. South-African sport is all about politics with a bunch of racists in charge.

Whyte Mann 11/19/2008 2:18:57 PM
Scrap the springbok altogether, I say. The Springbok jersey, and emblem, is a prestige achievement earned through hard work and dedication - not something awarded because of skin colour or so-called "imbalances of the past". @ Tebza: nobody understands the bullshit you write, mate!

Elizabeth 11/19/2008 2:19:59 PM
Uh.... Is Bryan Habana also missing the point? Don't you think if he saw the Springbok as racist, he would've refused to play? Or Chilliboy and all the rest? The Springbok is NOT racist, but seems like you are. Brandon, great article as always! Pete, would you rather have him make fun of rape and murder? We can't have seriousness all the time! Laughter is a good medicine!

Ben 11/19/2008 2:20:13 PM
Maybe they should put a picture of Luke Watson on the left side and a picture of Stofile on the right side of the jersey. Maybe the idiots will then stop complaining!!!!!!.

inside news24

Weather
Traffic
Lottery
Cpt: 19-24°C Mostly sunny. Mild. Pta: 15-28°C Widely scattered tstorms. Morning clouds. Warm.
Jhb: 13-26°C Showers late. Broken clouds. Mild. Bloem: 14-29°C Sunny. Pleasantly warm.
Dbn: 22-29°C More sun than clouds. Warm. PE: 19-26°C Sprinkles early. More sun than clouds. Mild.
7 day forecasts...

Jobs - Find your dream job

Teller

Gauteng
First National Bank

Regional Sales Manager - Corporate

Western Cape
West Coast Personnel
R18,000-20,000 Per Month Basic Salary Plus Comm

Facilities Manager

Western Cape - Cape Town
Quiglies Solutions

Cars - Search 1000's of new and used cars

AUDI

2006 Audi A8 4.2 Quattro Tiptronic
67000kms / Quartz Grey / R379 000

BMW

320d Dsl MY09 AT
2009
R 360,000.00

HONDA

Jazz 1.4 i-DSI 5-dr MY05
2008
R 125,900.00

VOLKSWAGEN

CitiGolf Chico 1.4 5-dr Phase II
2007
R 64,995.00

Property - Find a new home

CAMPS BAY

Single Residential - House R 12 950 000

PLETTENBERG BAY

Single Residential - House R 12 500 000

WATERKLOOF

Single Residential - House R 18 000 000

Travel - Look, Book, Go!

Free Games - TOO MUCH NEWS? TAKE A BREAK!

Kalahari.net - shop online today

All Games on Sale

God of War III, Battlefield Bad Company II & more new releases coming soon!

1000s of Kids' Books on Sale

Order your little ones Mr Men, Miss Little, Spot, The Vampire Diaries & more!

All Music on Sale

Get 10% off 24hr music, plus order your copy of the NEW Arno Carsten, Nianell & more!

30% Off Selected DVDs

100s of Oscar winners now on sale! American Beauty, Step Up, Happy Feet, Casino Royale & more!

Order ALL your UNISA textbooks from kalahari.net

Find all your UNISA books you require for your studies and get them delivered right to your doorstep!

Hot Deal of the Day!

Samsung R519 Notebook

Was R5,588.95 Now R4,999.95 - Save R538!

IntelPentium Dual Core T4200 2.0GHz, 8x DVD Super Multi Writer, 1.3 MP Webcam & more. See the electronics shop for more Hot Offers!

Visit www.kalahari.net for millions of books, music, DVDs, games & more!