Clock ticking for climate change push

2013-06-25 08:02
US President Barack Obama at Berlin's landmark the Brandenburg Gate near the US in Germany.

US President Barack Obama at Berlin's landmark the Brandenburg Gate near the US in Germany. (Jewel Samad)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Washington - Time is rapidly running out for President Barack Obama to make good on his lofty vow to confront climate change head-on. Since Congress is in no mood to help, Obama is taking matters in his own hands. He is preparing a set of actions that will take years to implement, likely running up against the end of his presidency.

Obama plans to unveil the plan on Tuesday in a speech at Georgetown University.

The centrepiece of the plan is a push to curb greenhouse-gas emissions from existing power plants. That's according to several people briefed on the plan, who weren't authorised to disclose details ahead of Obama's speech and requested anonymity.

Other components will include energy efficiency, renewable energy sources and help for communities preparing for the effects of climate change.

"This is a serious challenge, but it's one uniquely suited to America's strengths," Obama said on Saturday in a White House video announcing the speech at Georgetown University.

Yet environmental activists are frustrated that Obama, despite deeming climate change a priority as far back as his first presidential campaign, waited until his fifth year in office to issue a detailed plan.

In his State of the Union address in February, Obama gave lawmakers an ultimatum that if Congress wouldn't pass climate legislation, he'd take action himself. Four months later, Obama appears to be done waiting.

"His view reflects reality," White House spokesperson Jay Carney said on Monday. "We've seen Congress attempt to deal with this issue, and fail to."

Limited options

Days earlier, as word came of Obama's plans for existing power plants, the leader of the House of Representatives, Speaker John Boehner, called it "absolutely crazy", making clear the obstacles Obama would face in trying to push anything through Congress.

In going it alone, Obama's options are somewhat limited. But environmental activists say taking action to reduce the heat-trapping gases that coal-fired power plants emit would have the most impact.

Forty percent of US carbon dioxide emissions, and one-third of greenhouse gases overall, come from electric power plants, according to the US Energy Information Administration, the Energy Department's statistical agency.

The Environmental Protection Agency, using its authority under the Clean Air Act, has already proposed rules for new power plants, but those rules have been delayed.

Although finalising the rules for new plants would likely compel the government to eventually take similar action on existing plants, the Obama administration has until now insisted it's focused on new plants.

People briefed on Obama's plan for existing plants said that rather than issue a specific new standard, Obama will announce he's directing his administration to work with states and interested parties to develop a cost-effective, flexible system that can curb emissions without costing so much as to create negative economic impacts.

That's a process that will assuredly drag on for years.

"If EPA proceeds with regulations, they should be based on adequately demonstrated technology and provide an achievable timeframe to allow the coal industry to continue advancing clean coal technologies," said Mike Duncan, who runs the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity.

Must act now

So if Obama wants to see the new rules realised while he is still in charge, he has to start now.

Under the process outlined in the Clean Air Act, the EPA cannot act unilaterally, but must work with states to develop the standards, said Jonas Monast, an attorney who directs the climate and energy program at Duke University.

An initial proposal will be followed by a months-long public comment period before the EPA can issue final guidance to states. Then the states must create actual plans for plants within their borders, a process likely to take the better part of a year.

Then the EPA has another four months to decide whether to approve each state's plan before the implementation period can start.

"When you play all that out it does take you to the end of his second term," said Dan Lashof, who directs the climate and clean air program at the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Still, Obama has the opportunity to "set a clear timetable and expectations about the level of emission reductions that can be achieved," Lashof said.

The rules may also face legal hurdles if opponents challenge them in court. Although the Supreme Court has upheld the EPA's authority to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, the issue remains largely uncharted waters.

In one sign of the ongoing legal manoeuvring over how much the government can do to tackle emissions, the Supreme Court on Monday said it will consider reinstating an EPA rule overturned by a lower court that would have used the cross-state air pollution rule to impose restrictions on emissions on plants in upwind states.

Goal: cut carbon emissions

Another ticking clock is a goal Obama outlined in his first year in office, during global climate talks in Copenhagen, to cut US carbon emissions by about 17% by 2010, compared to 2005 levels.

The US for years appeared headed to meet that goal, helped by rock-bottom natural gas prices that made it cheaper for plants to shift from coal to cleaner-burning natural gas.

But government data shows that the trend is starting to reverse, raising questions about whether the U.S will be able to meet the goal unless Obama intervenes.

"The administration has no chance of meeting the 17% reduction target without such a rule," said Conrad Schneider of the Clean Air Task Force.

Living up to international obligations reflects another challenge for Obama's climate change push: Americans, by and large, are less concerned than their counterparts about what the warming of the planet will mean for them.

Just 40% of Americans said climate change is a major threat to the US in a poll the Pew Research Centre conducted in 39 countries in March and April. Globally, 54% of people said climate change threatened their country.

Read more on:    barack obama  |  climate change

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.
NEXT ON NEWS24X publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
1 comment
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24


Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.