Fears grow that Japan may sidestep whaling ban

2014-04-01 11:05
Japanese fishermen cutting up blocks of meat from a 10m-long bottlenose whale, slaughtered at the port of Wada in Minami-Boso. (Yoshikazu Tsuno, AFP)

Japanese fishermen cutting up blocks of meat from a 10m-long bottlenose whale, slaughtered at the port of Wada in Minami-Boso. (Yoshikazu Tsuno, AFP)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Sydney - Australia and New Zealand on Tuesday hailed a landmark court decision that Japan must halt an annual Antarctic whale hunt, despite fears it may try to sidestep the order.

The UN's Hague-based International Court of Justice on Monday ruled that Japan's whaling programme was a commercial activity disguised as science and said it must revoke existing whaling licences.

A "deeply disappointed" Tokyo said it would honour the ruling but did not exclude the possibility of future whaling programmes, with New Zealand expressing concerns Japan may try to circumvent the order.

"The ICJ decision sinks a giant harpoon into the legality of Japan's whaling programme", New Zealand foreign minister Murray McCully said.

"It still does leave Japan with a decision to make after they've digested this which is to look at whether they try to devise a new programme that is scientifically based that they could embark upon whaling in the Southern Ocean again.”

"Our task is to make sure that we carry out a diplomatic conversation that dissuades them from embarking on that course."

Redesign its programme

A Japanese minister on Tuesday defended whaling, seen by some as an important cultural practice and pointedly stopped short of detailing what next steps Japan could take.

"Whale meat is an important source of food, and the government's position to use it based on scientific facts has not changed", agriculture, forestry and fisheries minister Yoshimasa Hayashi told a press conference.

"We will scrutinise the verdict and study [measures to be taken] swiftly", he said according to the Jiji news agency. Japan also has a coastal whaling programme which is not covered by the ban.

Australia, backed by New Zealand, hauled Japan before the ICJ in 2010 in a bid to end the annual Southern Ocean hunt, with Tokyo accused of exploiting a legal loophole in the 1986 ban on commercial whaling that allowed the practice to collect scientific data.

International law expert Steven Freeland, from the University of Western Sydney, said Japan could simply redesign its whaling programme to skirt the ruling, pointing out that the ICJ confirmed scientific research can include killing whales, just not as many.

"The problem for Japan was its failure to take proper account of non-lethal methods of research or to justify the actual catch numbers it had declared", he said.

"Japan may instead take a very close look at why its implementation of [its research programme] fell foul of its legal obligations and perhaps seek to design and ultimately implement a new whaling programme that takes into account all of those elements."

Japan had argued that its JARPA II research programme was aimed at studying the viability of whale hunting, but the ICJ found it had failed to examine ways of doing the research without killing whales, or at least while killing fewer of them.

Former Australian attorney-general Mark Dreyfus, who was involved in arguing the case at The Hague, agreed that "on paper" the judgment left the door open for more slaughter.

"I'm calling on the government to work with Japan on non-lethal research, so that there won't be killings of whales in the Southern Ocean ever again", he said.

Australia's current attorney general George Brandis was subdued in his response, possibly mindful of the fact that Prime Minister Tony Abbott will next week make his first trip to Japan since winning office.
Read more on:    un  |  new zealand  |  australia  |  japan  |  marine life

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
1 comment
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24


Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.