Truth and lies are forces that can unarguably be witnessed during the Evolution / Creation debate. Somebody is wrong! In this case truth needs to be established in order to discern fact from propaganda, which is driven by lies. The Evolution / Creation issue is most probably one of the most important studies and has no place for deceitful statements, peoples worldview is at stake. Somebody is wrong and I enjoy pointing out who!
First of all before I get started I wish to just say that I appreciated every single comment that has been aimed towards me and do not take even one personally. I know sometimes things tend to get a little out of hand here in the “News24 Bull ring” but it just shows you how seriously people can get about their Religion. I have learned through trial and error that one can’t always refute all statements made; you have to eat the meat and spit out the bones. That’s the only productive way truth can be established. Scientists would surely agree on this, not all tests and experiments performed in the Lab are performed with a 100% success rate, yet still in every instance observations can be made and a report compiled.
When we discuss the topic of Evolution and Creation there is no space for presumptions or personal opinions. People’s worldview is at stake and ones worldview determines the way you make choices and how you treat people. Let’s be realistic, if you think you came from an ape…you are most probably going to act like one, without rules, moral standards or any values.
So let’s begin
When we look at the Debate concerning Evolution vs Creation we need to define Science first.
Science (from Latin scientia, meaning "knowledge") is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe.[
There are a couple different meanings or subdivisions to the term Evolution.
Cosmic, Chemical, Stellar and Planetary, Organic, Macro Evolution and Micro (variations).
This will then be the basis from which we will then base our investigation upon.
Cosmic evolution: The origins of time, space and matter (Big Bang). The Big Bang surely can’t be the origin of time space and matter. Apparently Something exploded – Where did that something come from? Did nothing explode? because that’s impossible. Where did the energy come from that caused the Explosion? The Big Bang does not explain where matter came from and I can’t understand how Evolution Scientists can even regard the Big Bang as an Explanation of time, space and matter. It just cannot be called Scientific. It’s only realistic in the imagination.
Chemical evolution: The evolution of higher elements past Hydrogen. The periodic table does not allow for this! Cannot be called Scientific.
Stellar and Planetary: Origin of stars and planets. All that Scientists see is stars getting brighter and they presume it’s a star being born. Couldn’t it be dust clearing up? It cannot be called Scientific
Organic evolution: Origin of life. Nobody has made life, maybe cloned or copied but not made a living cell in a lab. Yet organic evolution is excepted by all Evolutionists. Another Imaginary case.
Macro evolution: Changing from one kind into another. Now this is the one that Evolutionists put the time factor on, “millions and billions of years ago”. Nobody has observed this. The only proof they have is different fossils and bones being digged up which I’m also not sure how the link works because the only thing you know of a fossil or skelleton is that it has died… You surely can’t prove it had offspring it may have been the last of its species and now extinct but yet they pursue them all being tied together. I don’t get that! It SURELY cannot be Scientific. Case of Imaganation.
Micro Evolution: Variations within kinds. The only one that has been observed. Example, Different variations of dogs. A Great Dane and fox terrier are still the same kind… a Dog. Variations within a kind is limited, you don’t see dogs giving birth to horses.
The point I’m trying to make, is how Evolutionists can call Evolution Science yet it’s not Science in the True definition. If Evolution isn’t Science, it’s a Religion then.
Science in the true Sense suggests more a Creation account than anything else. The complexity of cells and DNA is proof of a Designer and creator. Evolution is a pointless and a dangerous religion with its only purpose being to discredit God. There are only 2 worldviews, the one being “pure accident” Evolution and the other Creation. The theory of Evolution suggests that death of man brought life.. Evolving and evolving till you have the elite breed. I’m very much convinced that Evolution also promotes Racism and many other forms of Communism. It’s Obvious that the Propaganda of Evolution is merely an attack on the people of the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob as it is pointless and does not contribute a thing to Science. Yet the followers of this so called “Theory” get extremely upset and aggressive in defending this Religion. They go so far as to ignore some common laws of physics like, “The 2nd law of thermodynamics”, which suggests deterioration instead of bigger, better, stronger and more intelligent growth which Evolution suggests. Also Digging deeper into History, major events like the holocaust which was driven by an Evolutionist Hitler clearly underlines what the Communist theory of Evolution’s motive was and still is today. Hitler said, “if you control the Textbooks you control the youth.” I presume that’s why the only place you find the Geological column are in the textbooks whereas in reality you find petrified trees in the upright position penetrating the so called multiple layers and making the illustrations in the textbooks even look more like a figure of someone’s imagination
I have nothing against Science, I love Science. It’s beneficial to the world community but don’t call Evolution Science. Evolution is a religion which only purpose is to discredit God. Its useless and Dangerous.
As I said in the beginning there are only two possible worldviews (Pure Chance) Evolution/(Intelligent Designer)Creation.
After looking at the Primary Evidence for the religion of Evolution I came to the conclusion that In the Beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth. That’s my religion which as a bonus comes with some moral values and in addition Everlasting LIFE ! The biggest Question evolutionists have to ask themselves is … How do you Distinguish right from wrong being a Evolutionist? It is so clear, just by looking at their comments on News 24 that they don’t possess this Gift!
Last Question and closing statement that I would like to pose at them is: Is it pure Accident that the Bible describes people Scoffing at the word of God?
2 Peter 3:3-7
King James Version (KJV)
3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,
4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep(Flood), all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.
5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:
6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:
7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
Because if it is not pure accident like your theory, your future isn’t looking that promising and evolution stops with you.
Disclaimer: All articles and letters published on MyNews24 have been independently written by members of News24's community. The views of users published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24. News24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received.