MyNews24 is a user-generated section of The stories here come from users.

Comments: 61
Article views: 765
Latest Badges:

View all theVillagersVoice's badges.

Genetics, Evolution and the Junk DNA Conundrum

20 December 2012, 13:43

Genetics and evolution have been at odds from the beginning. Only by ignoring advances in genetics has the fiction of evolution been maintained. Atheists on this forum punt that Genetics and the study of DNA undergird evolution. They also like to suggest that all scientists and biologists, and I’m not talking about the creationist scientists and biologists are all in more or less complete agreement with each other regarding the facts of evolution. Furthermore they love to go on about Peer Review and scientific journals, and that science is not science unless it passes peer review in scientific journals.

So are things so rosy in the naturalist scientific world? By no means! Consider the latest controversy between peer reviewed scientists and scientific journals and peer reviewed staunch evolutionists and other scientific journals who espouse Neo Darwinism around Junk DNA and the ENCODE (Encyclopedia of DNA Elements) findings by hundred of scientists, not the creationist kind, in 11 countries and published in 29 articles in the journals Nature and Genome Research.

So what is  Junk DNA? A geneticist, Susumu Ohno, was the first to coin the term “junk” DNA in 1972. Broadly speaking he was referring to large parts of the DNA structure that were non-coding, that is does not contain genes and code for proteins. As an evolutionist, he assumed that non-coding DNA was a genetic fossil that had some purpose in the evolutionary past, and subsequently discarded as we evolved into more complex creatures.

For many years the supposed Junk DNA actually inhibited science as since it was considered non functional as their evolutionary paradigm considered it worthless DNA. Most biology textbooks will tell you that 1 gene = 1 protein. The coding region of DNA, commonly called a gene, is transcribed  into messenger RNA – mRNA – which is read to make a protein which carries out many of the functions of the cell. The regulatory regions determine many aspects of the protein production such as when the protein is made, how much is made, how long it’s made, etc. Many of these regulatory regions had been identified, usually found close the gene, but it was considered that many more regulatory regions had to exist due to the complexity of protein regulation that exists in a cell.

The ENCODE Pilot Project studied 1% of the human genome or approximately 30 million bases spread throughout the genome. Nearly all the DNA under this study was found to be transcribed into RNA. ENCODE discovered some of the functions of the RNA transcripts including the regulation of transcription, replication of DNA, and the structure of chromosomes (which likely plays a role in the regulation of protein production).2 This may help account for the fact that even though we only have 20,000-25,000 genes in our DNA, we produce 100,000-300,000 proteins.

Although there are many scientists who are thrilled by the findings, there is a lot of opposition amongst evolutionists as being inconsistent with their worldview. Junk DNA was assumed to be a wasteland discarded by the evolutionary process.

Consider the following statements by proponents of evolution:

The earth is strewn with fossil remains of extinct species, is it a wonder that our genome too is filled with the remains of extinct genes?6
– Susumu Ohno (coined the term junk DNA).

In summary, then, there is a large amount of evidence which suggests, but does not prove, that much DNA in higher organisms is little better than junk.7
– Leslie Orgel and Francis Crick (co-discoverer of the structure of DNA).

Mammalian genomes are littered with such AREs [type of junk DNA], with roughly 45 percent of the human genomes made up of such genetic flotsam and jetsam.
– Francis Collins (Director of the National Institute of Health and director of the human genome sequencing project)

Leaving pseudogenes aside, it is a remarkable fact that the greater part (95 per cent in the case of humans) of the genome might as well not be there, for all the difference it makes.9
– Richard Dawkins (evolutionary biologist)

Note the inconsistency with one saying 45% and another saying 95%. The findings of ENCODE provide the answer as to why junk DNA is there. A good portion of it may be functional. But will this finding change the mind of evolutionists regarding junk DNA as junk? Probably not because this is not about the evidence, this is about worldviews. If the evidence is contrary, rather than change their worldview, evolutionists will simply attempt to make the evidence fit

So what are the main objections of evolutionists to these findings?

Many state that ENCODE’s definition of “functional” is too broad.
ENCODE defined function as specific biochemical activity. They do not know exactly what that function is as yet, but as it is transcribed into RNA, it could be playing some small paryt in the process. That a computers processor as an example, some switch may be used rarely under certain conditions, but whether it is on or off will play some role in the process, some bit whether 1 or 0 could play a role in the outcome and if damaged will result in a glitch even if it is only that your t may not be crossed on your screen. ENCODES third phase will be studying the function of the supposed Junk DNA when transcribed into RNA.

Many evolutionist say it doesn’t pass the Onion Test, which according to them has 5 times more Junk DNA than Humans who are much more complex. However onions grow in a wide variety of environmental conditions and who is to say that much of this Junk DNA is there to counter these extremes in environment.

Many evolutionists are now starting to claim that they never said all Junk DNA is junk. But what is truly junk. And what if that which is considered truly junk will one day be found to play a critical role in the process of life. After all is that not the progress that science is supposed to make, that new information always modifies existing knowledge with new understanding

No genetics is not the friend of evolution that many have been indoctrinated to think it is. Although science can prove that a particular sequence of DNA has some effect, I seriously doubt that science will ever be able to prove that a particular sequence of DNA has NO effect. Therefore, calling it ‘junk DNA’ was inadvisable in the first place, since that phrase contains an un-falsifiable assertion.

It seems so many scientist over the years have dug themselves in a hole by preaching this useless vestigial junk paradigm to students and to the general public, and now it has come back to bite them in the rear end!

Thus we can see that there is no real consensus among the scientific community about some of the essentials of evolution and biology, especially genetics, which we will get into another time.
Disclaimer: All articles and letters published on MyNews24 have been independently written by members of News24's community. The views of users published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24. News24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Read more from our Users

Submitted by
Seun Lenin Mogotji
Death road

The infamous R 25 road of Death that link Bronkhorstspruit and Groblersdal! Read more...

0 comments 212 views
Submitted by
Kobie Nel
Med aids for pets and domestics

Pets cannot take responsibility for themselves and therefore the owner takes that responsibility on themselves. Read more...

0 comments 567 views
Submitted by
Themba Rumbu
The Racism that is SA Rugby

Heyneke Meyer must fall. White privilege within the sporting code must be fought from all angles. The best player must take the field. Read more...

0 comments 882 views
Submitted by
Bizaboy Shongwe
Selfless leadership

Are politicians addressing the needs of the masses?

0 comments 235 views
The Cosatu conference decisions.....

The Cosatu 12th National Congress ended today in Midrand and two contentious matters that everyone thought may not be discussed actually found their way onto the agenda. Read more...

0 comments 394 views
Submitted by
Michael Ernest Meder
OUTA on EToll Debr

I really believe Outa is "smoking something" - they are now calling EToll laws unjust and irrational, a far cry from their initial stance of lack of public involvement. Read more...

0 comments 1004 views


E-mail Alerts The latest headlines in your inbox

RSS feeds News delivered really simply.

Mobile News24 on your mobile or PDA

E-mail Newsletters You choose what you want

News24 on Android Get the latest from News24 on your Android device.

SMS Alerts Get breaking news stories via SMS.

TV Get us in your home, on your television.

Interactive Advertising Bureau
© 2015 All rights reserved.
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.