Oscar seems to have revitalised the gun control advocates
who daily render a deluge of misinformation to the public and media. Some in ignorance of the facts but all from
gun control is correctly described as propaganda selling hate and fear of guns
to the public. Like sharks they can
smell blood from miles away.
Gun control would have us believe this question is
unanswered or in doubt. The public in
fear of being shot quiver in fright and horror as gun control and government
feed the public with irrelevant and misleading information. Relating horror stories and graphical
descriptions of the trauma of the victims who's blood they now bask in. Parading rehearsed victims still in shock and
getting them to weep and wail how bad guns are and this would never have
Then the "facts" are presented and guess what we
now have a new class of crime invented by gun control in order to get around
some very inconvenient facts. "Gun
crime" fits the bill as now gun control can discard all those nasty
inconvenient things were substitution takes place or criminals no longer need a
gun to face disarmed victims. A knife
will now do nicely for what a gun was previously needed for. In particular where a crime committed with a
firearm carries a higher sentence.
Criminals are not stupid.
In order to actually have a debate the evidence must be in
doubt or very scanty indeed. A review of
of the available evidence was exactly what the National Academy of Sciences
This prestigious organisation examined 253 journal articles,
99 books, 43 government publications, 80 gun-control laws, plus their own
studies. Its findings are published in a 328-page report. It could find no
evidence to support the conclusion that government restrictions on firearms
reduces gun crime, gun violence and gun accidents.
Nor was this finding isolated or a mistake. The CDC a known
gun control propaganda factory which had its funding cut by congress for
wasting tax payers money conducted its own research to reverse that
congressional funding cut. In October 2003, the Centre for Disease Control
concluded after examining its selected best 52 studies, papers and laws, there
is no meaningful proof gun control efforts have any affect on crime control.
Nor is this information new or unknown. The Carter
administration intending to build a case for comprehensive federal gun
restrictions handed out a major research grant to professor James D. Wright and
his colleagues Peter Rossi and Kathleen Daly. Wright and his colleagues were
asked to survey the state of research regarding the efficacy of gun control,
presumably to show that gun control worked and that America needed more of it.
When the researchers produced their report for the National
Institute of Justice in 1982, they delivered a document quite different from
the one they had expected to write. Carefully reviewing all existing research,
the three scholars found no valid evidence that America’s 20,000 gun-control
laws had reduced criminal violence.
By now it has become quite obvious that there are no
reputable valid competing studies that show a different outcome. Or that some
gun control measures work but not others. That gun control does not work in one
country but will work in others. Gun
control is a complete lie.
The only question that remains is why is nobody aware of
this fact and how are organisations like the SAPS, government and gun control
given credibility and coverage for what there is no evidence to support,
Is public safety, the lives and well being of everyone
including children so easily thrown aside by the SAPS, government and the media
in order to promote the falsity of gun-control?
The current claims that there is some success of gun control
has absolutely no evidence other than the tainted biased utterances of gun
control and governments. None that a number of prestigious very reputable
research organisations and researchers could find. Where is the debate? What is in doubt?
Based on the available evidence for what possible reason
could anyone demand gun control or gun control laws? What would be the valid
Disclaimer: All articles and letters published on MyNews24 have been independently written by members of News24's community. The views of users published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24. News24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received.