MyNews24 is a user-generated section of The stories here come from users.

Comments: 155
Article views: 1367
Latest Badges:

View all Rational_Believer's badges.

Many unscientific 'theories'

15 July 2013, 11:52
H4 { margin-bottom: 0.21cm; }H4.cjk { font-family: "WenQuanYi Micro Hei"; }H4.ctl { font-family: "Lohit Hindi"; }P { margin-bottom: 0.21cm; }A:link { }

Too many "theories" – many of them very UNscientific! – try to piggy-back on the theory of evolution.

Setting the Scene

Just to set the scene, let me start of by saying that, even as a Christian, I do not have a problem with the theory of evolution. I realised that I do not have to give up my trust in God – nor do I have to throw away the Bible – if I do not believe in Young Earth Creationism. What many people do not realise, is that DNA provides an even stronger case for evolution than the fossil record does. (My preference is theistic evolution as described by people like Francis Collins, Denis Alexander, etc., but that I do not want to derail the discussion with that now necessarily.)

The Immaturity of the Theory of Evolution

The basic underlying biological principles of evolution are understood, e.g. random mutations, natural selection, improved chances of survival due to being better adapted to survive and reproduce in the environment in which natural selection took place, etc.

The thing that I am concerned about is that the theory of evolution still has many gaps/unknowns. Please note: I am not referring to the common misconception of what a scientific theory is: I know what it means.

However, my concern is more about the fact that science currently mostly understands evolution looking backward in time, than understanding it looking forward. Currently, the model is more qualitative than quantitative. I am not referring to the difficulty in predicting the random aspects associated with the theory, but more about how it actually occurs. I know it is difficult, but I guess that – if something like a mathematical model existed to describe it – it would be more quantifiable.

For example, even Richard Dawkins' popular theories seem to have been overthrown – as can well be expected of the scientific process.

In this video (Ref 1) of the International Conference of Physiological Sciences during November 2012 in China, it shows how British biologist, Dr Denis Noble, proves that some of Dawkins's New-Darwinist concepts of evolution, specifically the “selfish gene” are scientifically untenable. It even proves that DNA is not the sole transmitter of inheritiance – plus a few more surprises!

The point I want to make is that evolution is still a very IMmature and NON-exact theory.

The Fashion: Piggy-backing other theories on the Theory of Evolution

I am therefore not saying that the theory of evolution is hogwash, but merely that it is still a very young and immature theory. Its effects can be seen looking backwards in time, but the lack of details in the theory (dare I call it speculation?) make it difficult looking forward.

An even greater danger I have become aware of, is that anything that can even vaguely be made to fit into a qualitative model of evolution is now forced into that model.

Suddenly we hear about:

* “The evolution of rational thinking”

* “The evolution of the mind”

* “The evolution of religion”

* “The evolution of human morals”

* etc.

The point is: just because it MAY be a nice idea to explain something in terms of “evolution”, does NOT mean it actually evolved! Just because it seems that evolution may work as an explanation, people jump onto the “evolution” bandwagon for a free ride to sell other non-related theories.

People seem to have caught onto the concept of “evolution” - and now they think that if it is possible to describe something in terms of “evolution” - their theory is “scientific” and probably correct. And this is at a time when biological evolution itself is not well understood yet!

Why should Evolution necessarily be the source of Morality?

In his previous article (Ref 2) on “Creationism vs Evolution - The source of Human Morality”, CyberMatix tried to explain whey evolution can be seen as the source of human morality. He does two things:

1) He tells a nice story of how it may or could work

2) He links it back to evolution and piggy-backs on it

I believe CyberMatix made such mistakes (as I highlight below) in the following excerpts from his article:

* “If one follows the TENET that evolution follows the path of least resistance in coming up with solutions that are the most adequate for a certain environment at a certain point in time, it CAN BE ASSUMED that this path not only include abilities to run faster (to better catch prey), but also abilities to survive better in a certain societal environment, and that includes emotions and instincts. As emotions is PROBABLY the prime driver for morals, morals also evolved in this way.”

* “It is NOT 100% clear why this emotion of numinousness was selected by the mechanism of evolution, but the fact [RB: “fact” - REALLY?] that is was selected means that it has some positive value in increasing the survivability of the species. It is ALSO NOT CLEAR that if this emotion was selected for in the natural environment that existed in the time of primitive man, that this emotion is still valuable for survival in the modern world we live in today.”

That's a lot of assumptions and lack clarity! Plus it merely piggy-backs on the term “evolution” - without any scientific foundation.

I therefore cannot agree that evolution is the root of morality.

If Evolution could be the source, then God can also be the Source.

CyberMatix again also tries to use evolution to explain “numinousness” when he says:

* “One of the instincts or emotions that were selected for, and that is still very prevalent in the human condition today is the emotion of the numinous (adjective) experience, or numinousness (noun). It turns out that this is a very powerful emotion that inspires feelings of awe and wonder in the beholder, as well as the feeling of divine or supernatural presence. This emotion creates a feeling that can be equated to “the need to believe”.”

He ends the paragraph by speculating that:

* “This basic concept has also “evolved” [RB: his original quotes] over time to the point that we have the modern religions we have today”.

He piggy-backs on the term “evolution” again – without any scientific foundation.

From a Christian perspective, mankind was made in the image of God. In addition, we are told that earth is not meant to be our final abode, but we are merely “passing through” to the greater things that God has planned for us.

Although sin has tarnished the image of God in us, God has built into us a longing for him. Christians of long ago described the numinous experience as a “God-given vacuum” to “draw us towards Him”.

While I do not try to provide the Christian explanation as a scientific one (as it does not intend to), the question is:

Is the “piggy-back evolution” explanation any more scientific than explained by God?

- - -


Ref 1: See: (or search for “ British biologist Denis Noble Neo-Darwinsim”).

Ref 2:

Disclaimer: All articles and letters published on MyNews24 have been independently written by members of News24's community. The views of users published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24. News24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Read more from our Users

Submitted by
Michael Mondli Hlophe
I worry about coalition governmen...

We can only speculate about the future results of coalition governments in South Africa. We can however agree that with coalitions, come challenges. Read more...

0 comments 233 views
Submitted by
Deon van Wyk
Questions about level 5 water res...

The monthly water reading varies monthly for a period between 27 to 35 days and after the holidays even 40 days. In these cases the monthly water usage will be more than 20kl per month. Will you be fined?  Read more...

0 comments 369 views
Submitted by
Amir Abdulazeez
Messi vs Ronaldo: a philosophical...

Cristiano Ronaldo will most likely settle as the 3rd all-time greatest player. In Messi’s case, he may rank worse than 3rd in many critical categories. Read more...

0 comments 233 views
Submitted by
Adorn Keketso
Africans must unite to find water...

African (and South African) leaders must realise that we are trapped in a vicious circle of foreign aids and that our deepening food and water crisis is the opportunity for the western power to take advantage of our sovereignty.  Read more...

0 comments 413 views
Submitted by
Sibonginkosi Mabika
A political storm is being contri...

Political uncertainty puts the citizens of South Africa in darkness preparing themselves for country’s biggest political storm.  Read more...

0 comments 713 views
Submitted by
Nkosenhle Sibisi
Dlamini-Zuma to be sworn in as AN...

I honestly think that it is time to stop scepticism as South Africans and give our female candidates a chance to lead and save our beautiful country, South Africa. Read more...

0 comments 801 views


E-mail Alerts The latest headlines in your inbox

RSS feeds News delivered really simply.

Mobile News24 on your mobile or PDA

E-mail Newsletters You choose what you want

News24 on Android Get the latest from News24 on your Android device.

SMS Alerts Get breaking news stories via SMS.

TV Get us in your home, on your television.

Interactive Advertising Bureau
© 2017 All rights reserved.
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.