In the spirit as the classic verbal game of “would you rather “and the practise of thought experiments, I’d like to pose a question to the readership on hate laws, pondering their efficacy and validity.
Which is worse? Someone being murdered for self enrichment or someone being murdered in a racially charged attack?
Is there a moral difference in motivation and do they require distinction in law and punishment? When and why does an aggravating factor require an entirely new branch of law?
Why does a motive in a hate prosecution apply in these circumstances but not when someone murders their own child for instance? Is murdering your child morally less abhorrent than murdering someone because they from a different identity group?
Disclaimer: All articles and letters published on MyNews24 have been independently written by members of News24's community. The views of users published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24. News24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received.