|
No homecoming
for Zim 70
04/08/2004 12:21 - (SA)
|
|
|
 |
|
| A dejected looking Marge Pain, wife of Ken Pain and Piet Style, brother of Neil Style after the Constitutional Court judgment. (Shayne Robinson, Sapa) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Johannesburg - The Constitutional Court on Wednesday dismissed an appeal by 69 South Africans held in Harare against a judgment by the Pretoria High Court in June that the government be compelled to assist them.
The men are being held on charges of plotting a coup in Equatorial Guinea. They have since pleaded guilty before a special court in a Harare prison to violations of Zimbabwe's immigration, firearms and security laws.
The men are currently awaiting sentence.
Chief Justice Arthur Chaskalson said on Wednesday the court was divided on some of the issues raised, but its ten judges were united in the view that the claim as formulated by the men demanding their rights under the South African Constitution was misconceived.
"They also hold that the claim that steps be taken as a matter of urgency by the South African government to seek the extradition of the applicants from Zimbabwe (to South Africa) must be dismissed," Chaskalson said in giving an overview of the various judgements.
The majority decision, written by Chaskalson, confirmed the order made by Transvaal Judge President Bernard Ngoepe in June that government could not be compelled to demand the return of the men to South Africa or be forced to ensure the men received fair trials and were detained under internationally acceptable conditions.
In his argument he was supported by Deputy Chief Justice Pius Langa and judges Dikgang Moseneke, Lewis Skweyiya, Johann van der Westhuizen and Zak Yacoob.
Judges Sandile Ngcobo and Albie Sachs broadly agreed with the majority view while Justices Kate O'Regan and Yvonne Mokgoro dissented.
In the majority judgment, Chaskalson also chided the lawyers for the men for attempting to rush the process through the media.
"There is no justification for the peremptory manner in which the proceedings were commenced, no satisfactory explanation for the failure to make the demand at the time the media was informed that court proceedings were to be launched. It must have been obvious to the applicants' attorneys that the demands could not reasonably have been responded to (by the government) within twenty four hours," Chaskalson said.
"Not surprisingly, there was no response..."
Foreign Affairs spokesperson Ronnie Mamoepa said the department "noted and welcomed" the court's decision.
"We still have to study the full text of the judgment to enable us to comment in greater detail. Nonetheless government will continue to offer consular services to South Africans imprisoned abroad including those in Zimbabwe and Equatorial Guinea," Mamoepa said.
- SAPA
|
