ICC is killing cricket

05/02/2008 13:20

Arthur Turner

The South African international domestic season has concluded and as expected South Africa easily defeated New Zealand and the West Indies in both their Test and the ODI series' without being tested.

The two touring teams were pathetic to say the least. They never seriously challenged the South Africans at any stage in spite of the West Indies winning the first Test at St Georges Park.

Both teams have now toured South Africa on three occasions since 1992 and have grown progressively worse.

This raises the question of how strong is the product called international cricket and is the game not being over exposed.

Impossible to sell

The international product is undoubtedly currently weak because of the lack of ability of the majority of teams like the West Indies, New Zealand and even England at times to compete with the top three nations: Australia, South Africa and India, especially away from home.

Add to this the likes of Zimbabwe, Bangladesh and Kenya and one has a product that is hard - if not impossible - to sell at times.

The ICC has confused the global development of the game with excellence, this has further undermined the integrity of international cricket.

Ultimate

There are only four events that currently enjoy a high profile and are marketable in international cricket.

The Ashes has by far the bigger appeal for Test cricket around the world. From an Australian and English point of view, one gets the feeling that winning the Ashes is the ultimate, even more important than winning the Cricket World Cup.

Test series' between India and Pakistan are also special because of the great rivalry that exists between these two great fanatical nations.

For the rest, with the exception of England, does anybody really care about Test cricket? This is sharply reflected in the attendances and the lack of passion around the world at present.

Not a priority

In the ODI version, the World Cup, played every four years, is the ultimate for all nations. ODI series' are played no more than for commercial purposes and used to develop teams for the World Cup. The winning of an ODI series is not a priority.

After the successful initial Twenty20 World Championship in South Africa it will become an important event in world cricket. However, winning this event will not be a priority for cricketing nations. It will remain a game to attract a new audience and increase revenue.

Over exposure has also made a big contribution towards the weakening of international cricket as a product. The ICC has totally lost the plot with regards controlling its product at the source. The simple principle of supply and demand has been ignored for greed.

Product mismanagement

One only has to look at South Africa's schedule for 2008 as proof of this. The Proteas tour Bangladesh, India, England and Australia this year and also play in the Champions Trophy in September.

Add to this the Indian Premier League (IPL) in which several South African players will be playing and this completes the picture of product mismanagement.

Modern day cricket is commercially glued together by two television contracts in ESPN Star and Sky Television and little else.

The danger of a weak international structure and over exposure is that cricket is fast becoming a television sport only. The culture of fans attending matches in the stadiums is at the very best, under threat.

  • Arthur is a former cricket administrator.

  • Send Arthur your thoughts

    Disclaimer: Sport24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on Sport24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Sport24.

    Sport24

    COMMENTS

    Punter says: Sport Madness
    05/02/2008 14:23
    Could not agree more with you, but then again it is the case of making more money for the fat cats in the ICC. The more sport, cricket in this case, the more these people earn. Sport is no longer played for the honouring your country etc, but for money, and the worst thing that could ever have happened was to professionlise sport. Bring back the days of Border vs Griqualand West etc.

    Dean Coetzee says: Where did you find this guy?
    05/02/2008 14:24
    England is weak? They beat SA in SA, and they beat Aus in Eng. How can you classify them as a weak side? The game is in trouble in SA, and that because of poor administration and a lack of value when you watch live cricket at the grounds. The SA tour to england is already seeing tickets being almost sold out. Look at Aus/IND series!

    Kaballas says: Not so fast
    05/02/2008 14:33
    I agree with most of your comments with a few differences. 1. South Africa also gets slaughtered away from home. Auz did it already as will India and Sri Lanka. Pakistan was in turmoil with Yousuf missing the first test and also they had no leadership at that time. We are very much overrated with our Fat-Slip-Chewing-Captain-Duck-With-Serious-Technique-Issues-And-His-Bitch-Mickey-Mouse along side him. (maybe Smith should field at third man?? 2. England beat us last time they were here if I remember correctly and will beat us again in England. International cricket is falling apart. Already half of our best players is unavailable due to KOLPAK/INDIAN LEAGUE and it will get worse. The Indian TV rights have just recently been sold for a massive amount and this will certainly cause the loss of even more players. The obvious replacement for Shaun Pollock would have been Ryan Mclaren (as would Jacques Rudolph for Herschelle) but alas, they are lost to us.

    Berns says: Dean Coetzee where are your stats?
    05/02/2008 16:19
    Dean cuz, SA has won 15 of their last 30 tests, drawn 5 and lost 10 (5 of those vs Australia). England on the other hand have only won 9 of their last 30 matches, lost 11 (5 of those vs Australia) and drawn 10 (yawn). Sound to me pretty much like SA is a lot stronger of late than the palooka Pommies. But I agree with this column, too much cricket is killing the sport.

    Granville says: Kabalas
    05/02/2008 16:58
    Get off your Jacque Rudolf "gemors". Did you not learn your lesson the last time. And Ryan McLaren.... We have Dale Steyn & Morne Morkel. Even Polly reckons that we are gonna be fine. Rudolf had his chances and he wasted it. And if you want the numbers, I can give to you again.

    Larry Dalton says: Yes, but.....
    05/02/2008 17:14
    While much of what has been said is true, what must be added is that the ICC has become the pander-dog to India and England....these two wag the proverbial ICC dog. These three are collectively destroying world cricket. With regards to SA - SA has long lost its love for test cricket, so who really cares about losing to England, who doesnt shape against SA in the shorter forms of the game - they are weak at ODI's and T20....SA remains well placed on the ODI Rankings, regularly beating every world team. As far as our 2008 tours go ( Bangladesh aside), we'll do well in the ODI's as usual....Aussie will beat SA in the Tests, the rest will be up for grabs. As far the comment on the Black Caps is concerned...I hope that they make a comeback...they play good, honest cricket and always spring surprises....who can say that their performance in the World Cup was weak? Cricket remains a great sport, with all its problems and issues.....

    Simon says: Blinkered
    05/02/2008 18:51
    How on earth are England weak? Eng destryed WI and will hammer NZ. Beaten SA home and away. Appreciate SA a decent side but I can guarantee England will compete this summer. What about SL - more than competitive.

    This comments facility is now closed.
  •