|
US Mideast plan 'preposterous'
24/07/2006 15:03 - (SA)
Cairo - A vision of a new Middle East emerging from the conflict in Lebanon as outlined by US secretary of state Condoleezza Rice drew ridicule on Monday from mainstream Arab analysts and former Arab diplomats.
Several of them said the United States and Israel had little
if any chance of achieving their stated goals of disarming Hezbollah and deploying the Lebanese army or an international buffer force along the Israeli-Lebanese frontier.
"I think it's preposterous. From the beginning this is a
plan that cannot be achieved," former Egyptian foreign minister
Ahmed Maher told Reuters.
Hatred and extremism
In the meantime, by giving the green light to an Israeli
offensive which has killed more than 300 civilians and done
damage worth billions of dollars, the United States has helped
stir up hatred and extremism in a troubled region, they say.
Rice said that on her trip to the Middle East, which began
on Monday, she would not try to restore the status quo which
existed before a Hezbollah raid into Israel this month.
"What we're seeing here, in a sense, is ... the birth pangs
of a new Middle East and, whatever we do, we have to be certain
that we're pushing forward to the new Middle East, not going
back to the old one," she added.
US wants 'a tame Middle East'
Maher, who was also ambassador to Washington for many years,
said: "In fact what the United States wants to have is a tame
Middle East. That's what they call a new Middle East."
Mohamed el-Sayed Said, a political analyst who worked in
Washington and takes part in "civil society" meetings with
visiting US officials, said he was shocked by the latest twist
in US policy towards the region.
Neoconservative school of thought
"What kind of Middle East will be born from this
destruction? The only new thing we can get is new determination
on the part of Hezbollah or the people of Lebanon to resist
Israel and cause it as much pain as possible," he said.
The Arab analysts drew parallels with the US invasion of
Iraq and the US refusal to back an immediate ceasefire in
Lebanon, which they said amounted to endorsement of Israel's
bombing campaign.
Both policies are associated with the neoconservative school
of thought in Washington, which holds that Israel is a natural
ally of the United States and that pre-emptive force must be used
to defeat threats in the early stages.
Syria
Juan Cole of the University of Michigan, an expert on Iraq
and Shi'a Islam, said the administration wanted to use the
Israeli offensive against Hezbollah "as a wedge to convince
Syria to give up rejectionism and detach itself from Iran".
But he added: "Syria is not going to give up its stance
toward Israel unless it at the very least gets back the occupied
Golan Heights."
- Reuters
|
News
