Women’s bodies are still a colonial battlefield

2016-09-04 09:44
WHITE RULES A Muslim woman is ordered by French police to remove her ‘burkini’. Picture: Vantagenews.com

WHITE RULES A Muslim woman is ordered by French police to remove her ‘burkini’. Picture: Vantagenews.com

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

In October 1989, three French Muslim schoolgirls were expelled from school for wearing headscarves.

The principal and teachers interpreted their refusal to remove the scarves as an attack on laïcité (secularism) in public schools.

By 2004, the headscarf was banned in all French public schools.

Full-face veils were outlawed in 2011. In 2016, the “burkini” – a full-body swimsuit that allows Muslim women to swim with most of their skin covered – was declared illegal.

We were still absorbing images of Muslim women being coerced out of their swimwear by armed police on French beaches, when reports emerged of a black student at the Pretoria High School for Girls not being allowed to write her exam, another forced to serve detention, others verbally abused and humiliated – because they wore their hair as God intended.

France’s burkini ban and Pretoria High School for Girls’ hair policy spring from the same colonial well.

The French fixation with unveiling Muslim women originates from French colonialism in north Africa, particularly Algeria, in the late 1950s.

Frantz Fanon’s 1959 essay, Algeria Unveiled, reveals how French colonisers believed that unveiling Algerian women would destroy Algerian resistance to French colonialism.

They asked nicely at first. “You’re so pretty, you should unveil yourself,” posters told Algerian Muslim women, urging them to be like the women in the ruling country.

The veil, a potent symbol of Algerian national existence, was also forcibly removed by French forces, and called “liberation”.

For centuries, black girls have grown up believing that their hair, in its natural state, is something that needed to be fixed.

The Afro was seen as “uncivilised”, initially by white slave masters, and later colonisers. It needed to be transformed into straight hair – an attribute of white women – in order for it to be accepted and considered beautiful.

What we’ve seen in the past week is that from Pretoria to Paris, women’s bodies are still being policed according to the rules of white colonialism and respectability, under the guise of multiculturalism.

Writing this week about Pretoria High School for Girls’ code of conduct, social commentator Khaya Dlanga argued that multiculturalism is a myth in Model C schools.

These schools are seen to be the archetype of South Africa’s rainbow nation: students of all races and cultures, learning together in harmony.

“What schools mean by multiculturalism is assimilation and domination of all other cultures by one to form a monoculture,” explained Dlanga.

For black women, that means we’ll accept your bodies, but only if they fit our norms of acceptability.

Muslim women in France will be accepted, but only if their clothes fit white feminist specifications of suitability.

Scarf-wearing Muslim women weren’t even invited to meetings of France’s established feminist groups.

With that strip of cloth on their heads, they surely couldn’t be feminists, could they?

Most French feminists saw no problem with the 2004 headscarf ban in public schools that excluded scarf-wearing Muslim girls from schools – thus violating their right to education.

French women’s rights groups were silent on a 2011 banning of the face veil in public, thus denying those Muslim women who choose to cover themselves access to public spaces.

Over the past decade, hundreds of Muslim women have been fired from their jobs because they wore a scarf.

Throughout it all, mainstream French feminists gave their tacit approval of the French government’s actions.

Yet, these same feminists have devoted inordinate amounts of time and energy deconstructing and denouncing the restrictions placed on women in Saudi Arabia and Iran.

Is it oppression only when brown men tell women how to dress? Why is it called “liberation” when white men in a liberal, Western democracy police women?

Is the morality police of Paris or Cannes more moral than in Jeddah or Tehran?

We’re sick and tired of having colonial feminism imposed on us; telling us that our hair is not straight enough, our skins not fair enough, our clothing not revealing enough.

We will choose how to wear our hair, and whether we want to cover it. We don’t need anyone to save us from our hijab or our hair.

Read more on:    pretoria high school for girls  |  colonialism  |  burkini ban  |  hijab

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.
NEXT ON NEWS24X

Inside News24

 
/News

Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.