Beeld | Die Burger | Volksblad | Rapport | Sake | Finansies & Tegniek | LandbouWeekblad |
Huisgenoot
| Dit | Sarie | Bruid24 | LitNet | KykNet | Gemeenskapskoerante
Error processing SSI file
 

TygerBurger
Weer
Aktueel
Sport
Vermaak
Artikels
Menings
  • Resepte
  • Kommentaar
  • Briewe
  • Rubrieke
  • Dagboek
    Motors
    Eiendomme
    News24
    Die Burger
    Argief
    MetroBurger
    Sakenuus
     
    Wie's Ons Soek Advertensies
      Aangebied deur:

    23/07/2008 01:00 PM - (SA)
    Pet bylaw in the think tank
    JOANNA TROOST


    IF you are the proud owner of Pluto the pooch or Felix the cat, it may be a good idea to voice your opinion once the public participation process of the draft Animal Bylaw 2008 starts.

    This bylaw will affect all pet owners, whether your pet is a thoroughbred or of somewhat suspect origin.

    Pet owners will especially be affected by three aspects, namely number of pets per property, that beloved (or hated?) poop scoop to make up for your dog’s lack of public toilet manners and the identification of all cats and dogs.

    The bylaw proposes that the number of pets per property be limited. As it is still in draft form, the number has not yet been finalised, says Councillor JP Smith, Chairperson: Safety Portfolio Committee, but the most likely number seems to be two (dogs and cats) per residential property.

    Residential owners who have, up till now, had more pets will not be forced to get rid of them, but would need to apply for a permit to keep that extra four-legged friend. Such an application would need to include the neighbours’ permission and a fee is payable (amount not yet specified). An inspection will then be done to ensure that the specific erf is suitable for the extra pet(s), Smith explained.

    Faeces in public is another matter of concern. If the bylaw is passed, owners taking their dogs for a walk would need to carry a poop scoop with them or some sort of container to ensure that they will pick up their loyal friend’s gifts to the earth. “It can be any kind of container,” Smith says. “Failure to have such a bag with you is also an offense.” This bylaw will not apply to persons assisted by a guide dog.

    The identification of pets is also on the cards. The bylaw proposes that all dogs and cats should be collared and tagged so that its owner could be located if needed. Otherwise the animal, found wandering about without identification, may be impounded.

    If your cat is an ardent tree climber or an escape artist, you need not despair.

    Instead of worrying about find?ing your feline friend dangling by its collar on a branch, or having to hunt for that collar after his escape act, you could have your cat microchipped. The same option applies to dog owners.

    An aspect not covered by the bylaw is the forced sterilisation of pets (especially cats).

    The growing problem of aban?doned and unsterilised pets are a major concern for animal welfare organisations.

    But the bylaw does allow the authorities to intervene in cases of animal hoarding syndrome – people collecting a large number of animals, usually strays, on their property.

    “The new bylaw will allow us to access (private) property if we think it is necessary. We would have the right to go and sterilise animals when we think it is necessary,” Smith said.

    Asked about the public participation process, Mr Charles Cooper, media spokesperson for the City of Cape Town, said the draft bylaw is very much in its early stages and the public participation process has not been finalised.

    Copies of the bylaw in its current form can be obtained by e-mailing Tessa Williams of the Public Participation Unit at l.uthesia.williams@capetown.gov.za

    .Any comments? SMS your opin?ion to 32516. (R1 per SMS.) Start with the word ‘law’, followed by your name and the comment.

    . What does microchipping entail? See page 10..




    Back to top     Na bo

    © 2001 TygerBurger - alle regte voorbehou.