Pact is 'self-serving'
2005-07-28 10:32
Sydney - Environmentalists on Thursday condemned a new pact against global warming by the United States and five Asia-Pacific countries, saying it was self-serving and would not work.
The agreement by the US, Australia, India, China, South Korea and Japan calls for a non-binding compact to reduce greenhouse gas emissions which are blamed for climate change.
"Skulking around making secretive, selective deals will not accomplish" a reduction in emissions as called for in the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, which the US and Australia have declined to ratify, said Greenpeace Australia.
"No doubt the (Australian) government has been cooking this scheme up for a while to cover up for their failure to ratify Kyoto, and to try prove that developing countries are abandoning Kyoto," said spokesperson Catherine Fitzpatrick.
"This is not the case. Unlike Australia, China, India and South Korea have all ratified Kyoto and are moving forward to implement their commitments," she said.
"The suggested scheme is, unlike Kyoto, a voluntary scheme and all evidence shows that voluntary schemes do not work."
The Kyoto accord legally commits 39 industrial nations and territories to trim their output of six greenhouse gases - especially carbon dioxide, the by-product of burning fossil fuels such as coal and oil.
Friends of the Earth Australia said the proposed alliance "does not address the immediate need to cut greenhouse pollution by at least 60% by 2050.
"Although detail on the 'secret plan' is difficult to access, it appears to contain no binding commitments," spokesperson Cam Walker said.
"By staying out of the 'main game', the Kyoto Protocol on greenhouse gases, the US and Australia continue to be open to criticism that they are only looking after their narrowly defined interests at the expense of the rest of the world," he said.
The leader of the opposition Australian Greens party, Bob Brown, dismissed the new agreement as "a coal pact" involving four of the world's biggest coal producers - China, the US, India and Australia.
It was designed to "defend the coal industry in an age where it's the biggest industry contributing deliberately to the global warming threat to Australia and the planet," he said.