Is an employee ­settlement bulletproof?

2015-10-14 06:00


Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories


My business recently had to take disciplinary action against an employee, after which he agreed to resign and we concluded a settlement agreement to that effect.

Now I hear the employee is going to take us to the CCMA.

Can he override our settlement agreement and do this?

ANSWER: A primary objective of the Labour Relations Act is to encourage parties to resolve their own labour disputes and not have to make use of formal dispute resolution mechanisms.

Accordingly, should parties be able to resolve their own labour disputes by way of, for example, entering into a voluntary written settlement agreement either before, during, or after a disciplinary hearing or retrenchment exercise, this is an acceptable method of laying a matter to rest and often helps avoid the parties having have to air their dirty laundry in public.

Such a settlement agreement usually determines that the matter is settled in full between the parties and that the employee cannot approach the CCMA with an unfair dismissal or unfair labour practice claim.

However, the Labour Appeal Court ruled in a recent case that the resolving of an unfair dismissal and/or unfair labour practice through a settlement agreement does not oust the jurisdiction of the CCMA from hearing the matter and dealing with the merits thereof.

This means that a settlement agreement that is a full and final settlement and entered into willingly by an employee is not immune to review and further investigation.

In this particular case, it was held that the implementation of an agreement to accept demotion may constitute an unfair labour practice, allowing the CCMA to have jurisdiction to conciliate over the matter which was finalised through a settlement agreement.

The Labour Court held that the CCMA was able to consider the issue, despite any agreement, but that the presence of such an agreement would be a factor to be considered with the onus resting on the employee to prove the unfair conduct.

This means that an employee, even in a case such as yours where a settlement agreement was concluded, could still refer the matter to the CCMA, but that the onus will now be on the employee to show that the dismissal was unfair and that the settlement agreement should not apply.


Tata Mokwayi, candidate attorney, Phatshoane Henney Attorneys

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

Inside News24

Financial advisors – Do you need one and should you get one?

The good, the bad, and everything else you need to know when considering hiring a financial advisor.


Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.