ANC, DA claim vindication

2014-10-24 22:23
(File: Sapa)

(File: Sapa)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Johannesburg - The ANC and the opposition on Friday claimed the SABC judgment vindicated their clashing views on whether the public protector's findings are binding - an issue which is central to the Nkandla controversy.

The ANC said the order went a long way in clarifying interpretations pertaining to the public protector's reports.

"In his judgment today, the judge endorsed our longstanding and legally sound view that the reports of the public protector are not binding and enforceable," Chief Whip Stone Sizani said in a statement.

He said the ANC agreed that the public protector's reports could not be ignored; that was why the ad-hoc committee on security upgrades to President Jacob Zuma's Nkandla home was set up.

"The judgment affirms the correctness of our stance in the committee, and exposes the opposition’s ill-advised posturing, which even prompted their ill-conceived walkout from the committee."

The issue of whether her reports were binding and enforceable had been a subject of debate in the ad hoc committee on security upgrades to Zuma's Nkandla home.

Western Cape High Court Judge Ashton Schippers on Friday ordered that the SABC suspend its chief operating officer Hlaudi Motsoeneng and commence disciplinary proceedings against him within 14 days.

This was following the DA's application for an urgent interim interdict suspending Motsoeneng pending a review of the decision to appoint him.

In his order Schippers said: "Unlike an order or decision of a court, a finding by the public protector is not binding on persons and organs of state.

"However, the fact that the findings of and remedial action taken by the public protector are not binding decisions, does not mean that these findings and remedial action are mere recommendations, which an organ of state may accept or reject."

The DA's federal executive chairperson James Selfe said the judgment supported the DA's arguments that directives from the public protector, including those that Zuma must repay a portion of the R246m spent on his Nkandla home, could, by law, not be disregarded.

"Judge Schippers found that while the findings of the public protector are not outright binding on organs of state, they equally cannot be ignored," Selfe said.

"The implication of this judgment is that organs of state must implement the findings and remedial action of the public protector unless they declare rational grounds, that would stand up in a court, for not doing so."

DA’s court bid

Selfe said that as the DA's successful court bid to overturn Zuma's appointment of Menzi Simelane as national director of public prosecutions had shown, courts set a high standard for showing that somebody had rationally applied their mind.

"The fact that the president had met with [then justice minister Jeff] Radebe and they had discussed it was not enough," he said.

Selfe said he believed that, in fact, findings by the public protector were binding, and that the SABC's plans to appeal were not necessarily an unwelcome turn of events.

"It might provide further clarity if a higher court pronounces on the issue," he said, referring to the status of orders from the public protector.

The EFF welcomed the court's order, also seeing it as vindication for the public protector with regards to Nkandla.

"The EFF welcomes the ruling as a vindication of the public protector, whose office the ANC government has defied, ridiculed and attacked," spokesperson Mbuyiseni Ndlozi said in a statement.

"The court ruling must serve as a lesson in respect of the findings of the public protector on Nkandla and what President [Jacob] Zuma must do."

The Pan Africanist Congress said it was not confident that the SABC would institute the disciplinary proceedings against Motsoeneng.

"The PAC remains extremely frustrated by the fact that the disciplinary action will be conducted under the cloud in the SABC board," it said in a statement.

"The board that is chaired by Ellen Tshabalala, who stands accused of the same qualification dishonesty."

The party, however, welcomed the order.

It said it clarified the legal perspective on the public protector's remedial recommendations, and it hoped the Nkandla committee and the president took note.

Read more on:    da  |  anc  |  eff  |  sabc  |  hlaudi motsoeneng  |  cape town  |  politics  |  nkandla upgrade  |  media

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.
NEXT ON NEWS24X publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Financial advisors – Do you need one and should you get one?

The good, the bad, and everything else you need to know when considering hiring a financial advisor.


Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.