ConCourt to hear medical emergency case

2015-02-25 15:43
(File, Sapa)

(File, Sapa)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Johannesburg - The Constitutional Court will hear argument on Thursday in a case about an injured schoolboy's rights to emergency medical treatment after he was injured in a rugby match.

Charles Oppelt suffered a low velocity spinal cord injury during the match in March 2002.

Thirteen hours later doctors operated on him, but he was left severely paralysed.

In the Western Cape High Court, Oppelt tried to claim damages from the head of the provincial health department and three organisations responsible for the administration of the rugby game in which he was injured.

The high court dismissed his claims against the rugby organisations, but found the department's staff failed to treat the spinal injuries timeously.

An expert witness for Oppelt testified that if the procedure had been performed within four hours of the injury, Oppelt would probably not have become a quadriplegic. A witness for the department disputed this.

The high court found the department's staff were negligent as they had not timeously referred Oppelt to a specialised hospital.

The unreasonable delays justified the conclusion that the department refused emergency medical treatment to Oppelt, as provided for in section 27(3) of the Constitution.

As such, the court concluded that the department was liable for Oppelt's proven damages.

The department successfully appealed to the Supreme Court of Appeal, which found the validity of the methods employed by Oppelt's expert could not be proved on a balance of probabilities.

In the Constitutional Court, Oppelt argues the SCA's approach to evaluating expert medical evidence was wrong and that the SCA denied him a fair hearing.

The department opposed the application, arguing the SCA's method of evaluating the medical evidence was sound. It argues that the constitutional rights Oppelt depends on are not applicable in this case.

Read more on:    constitutional court

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.
NEXT ON NEWS24X publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Financial advisors – Do you need one and should you get one?

The good, the bad, and everything else you need to know when considering hiring a financial advisor.


Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.