'Modimolle monster' denied leave to appeal

2013-09-13 20:35
Johan Kotze (Picture: Sapa)

Johan Kotze (Picture: Sapa)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Pretoria - The North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria denied convicted killer Johan Kotzé and his three co-accused leave to appeal on Friday.

Dismissing applications by Kotzé, Andries Sithole, Pieta Mohlake and Sello Mphaka for leave to appeal against their convictions, Judge Bert Bam said there was no prospect of success on appeal.

Two months ago, Bam sentenced Kotzé and Sithole to two life sentences each for murdering Kotzé's 19-year-old stepson Conrad Bonette and raping Kotzé's estranged wife Ina Bonette.

Mohlake and Mphaka were also sentenced to life imprisonment for gang raping Bonette.

Kotzé was sentenced to an additional 25 years imprisonment, and the other three to an extra 18 years imprisonment for kidnapping and seriously assaulting Bonette.

The attacks on Bonette and her son happened at Kotzé's house in Modimolle on 3 January 2012.

Piet Greyling, for Kotzé, on Friday attacked Bonette's evidence, saying that she had "exaggerated" what happened to her, had lied on the witness stand and was not a credible witness.

He said if her evidence fell away, Kotzé's evidence became more credible, which cleared the way for another court accepting clinical psychologist Tertia Spangenberg's evidence.

He argued that the court should have accepted the evidence of Bonette's former husband and an article in the magazine Huisgenoot as proof that Bonette had not told the full truth to the court, as her initial versions differed from her evidence under oath.

He argued that Kotzé's mental condition should have been taken into account as mitigation when it came to sentencing.

Jan van Rooyen, for Sithole, said the accused's convictions stood and fell on the evidence of Bonette, who was a single witness and whose evidence was not supported by DNA or even the medical evidence.

He said Sithole had not even known Conrad Bonette, had no motive to kill him and that another court might conclude that Sithole should not have been convicted of the murder.

Francois van As, for Mohlake and Mphaka, argued that "red lights" should have flickered about the reliability of Bonette's evidence, but Bam said he had never seen any red lights.

Van As said the fact that Bonette had begged his clients for help showed that she had not been afraid of them, which supported their version that they were not willing participants.

Van Rooyen and Van As both argued that there were factors which could lead another court to impose less sentences.


Bam said he was still convinced that the evidence against the accused was overwhelming, and that there was no chance that another court would find that the accused's versions were reasonably true.

He was also still of the opinion that the sentences were fitting under the circumstances and found that there was no reasonable prospect that another court would interfere.

Bam described Kotzé as "inherently evil" when he convicted him and said he and the others had shown no remorse for what they did.

Bonette testified that Kotzé had sexually tortured her and cut off her nipples while the other three looked on before they took turns to rape her.

While she lay helplessly gagged and tied to a bed, she was forced to listen to her son begging Kotzé for his life before he was shot to death.

Kotzé claimed he could not remember and could not be held accountable for his actions that day.

His co-accused claimed Kotzé had forced them at gunpoint to co-operate and that they had only pretended to rape Bonette because they could not get erections.

Read more on:    ina bonette  |  johan kotzé  |  andries sithole

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Financial advisors – Do you need one and should you get one?

The good, the bad, and everything else you need to know when considering hiring a financial advisor.


Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.