No comment on Zuma SIU response

2014-09-22 16:29
(Picture: Sapa)

(Picture: Sapa)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Cape Town - The presidency on Monday declined to comment on a press report that, until he was served with a legal warning, President Jacob Zuma failed to respond to Special Investigating Unit (SIU) questions on his Nkandla home.

"That is not a matter we would comment on," presidential spokesperson Mac Maharaj said from New York.

"The issue is that the report is completed and has been given to Parliament. Now the issue is the content, and it becomes one of the reports before the parliamentary ad hoc committee."

Beeld reported on Monday that Zuma was one of two recalcitrant third parties whose lack of co-operation delayed the SIU's final report into misspending on his private Nkandla home by some three months.

It said the president finally responded on 8 August, and only after he was put on terms by the anti-corruption unit, which was authorised to probe the Nkandla controversy in December last year.

"The SIU struggled for months to enlist the president's co-operation in its investigation into the Nkandla project of R246m," Beeld reported in the front-page article.

"Zuma was the very last official to answer the SIU's questions."

According to page 235 of the SIU's final report: "As we were required to do, we sought responses from the third parties. Not all were prompt with their responses.

"In fact, in respect of two of these parties, we had to formally put them on terms. The last response was received only on 8 August 2014."

Still on that page, the SIU adds that "a further major stumbling block to the earlier finalisation of our investigation was the fact that we were allowed access to the Nkandla complex only on 3 July 2014”.

Both issues were raised by SIU head Vas Soni when he addressed Parliament's justice portfolio committee in July.

Frustration over delays

At that briefing, Soni expressed frustration at the delays, as well as concern that it was becoming an embarrassment for the unit.

The final report, which was submitted to Parliament this month, explicitly seeks to counter a perception that the unit deliberately delayed its findings to ease pressure on Zuma to respond to Public Protector Thuli Madonsela's report on Nkandla, which was made public in March.

"Such delay, the media suggested, was for an illegitimate purpose: to assist the president to delay his official response to the report of the public protector.

"We cannot say too strongly: Those reports are totally without foundation."

Madonsela gave Zuma two weeks to respond to her report, but the president said he would only do so when he had also received that of the SIU.

He finally submitted a response to the various investigations into Nkandla to Parliament in mid-August, and in it made clear that he was neither commenting on, nor tacitly accepting, Madonsela's findings.

The president and the public protector have since been locked in a stand-off. Madonsela warned that his response was inadequate, while Zuma has said he did not consider himself obliged to "rubber stamp" her findings.

Opposition parties say the president's view runs counter to the Constitution.

Maharaj declined to say when Zuma filed his response to the SIU.

The unit found Zuma and his family were enriched by state-funded upgrades to his Nkandla home.

But, unlike Madonsela, it did not direct Zuma to reimburse the state for luxuries, such as a swimming pool, built at Nkandla. Instead, it is suing the president's architect, Minenhle Makhanya, for R155m - its estimate of the state's total losses as a result of the project spiralling into what it terms "unacceptable extravagance".

Read more on:    siu  |  jacob zuma  |  thuli madonsela  |  cape town  |  nkandla upgrade

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.
NEXT ON NEWS24X

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
77 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

 
PARTNER CONTENT
INFOGRAPHIC: New thinking required for retirement

Everything we believe about retirement is fast becoming outdated.

PARTNER CONTENT
WATCH: How education can change a life

A university education gives students the chance to create a better future for themselves, their families and to opportunity achieve their dreams.

/News

Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
Traffic
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.