Pistorius bail decision expected
2013-02-22 12:23
Video
2013-02-22 11:55
Watch Oscar Pistorius supporters protesting his innocence outside the Pretoria Magistrate's Court ahead of the paralympian's bail hearing. WATCH
Blade Runner (eBook)
During the course Oscar has battled to overcome extraordinary difficulties to prove that, with the...
Was R110.95
Now R87.00
buy now
Pretoria - The outcome of Oscar Pistorius 's bail application
was expected to be known after lunch on Friday at the Pretoria Magistrate's
Court.
Magistrate Desmond Nair adjourned until 14:30 after hearing
submissions from the State and defence after Pistorius was charged with the
murder of his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp last week.
The evidence presented to the court was based on an initial
report of the crime scene, and the point of the application was to determine
whether he should get bail or not.
There was no testimony from Pistorius.
'Probable'
Before the court adjourned, his lawyer Barry Roux said
Pistorius's actions after the shooting of Steenkamp were "probable".
Explaining the "frantic moment" when he realised
Steenkamp was not in bed after she was shot in the bathroom, Roux said it was
"probable" that he ran downstairs to unlock the front door to let
help in, after he had phoned the estate manager.
"These are the facts. There is nothing improbable about
that," he said.
Referring to the State's submission that he was a flight
risk he said: "It's difficult for this man to disappear from this earth.
It would be difficult for him to go through airport security.
"His legs need adjustment every month," said Roux.
Every time he goes through an airport there is a commotion
and "security bells go off".
"It's far more difficult for a person in the position
of the applicant with his known difficulties because he is easier to be
identified."
Nel turned down an offer to address the court again, saying
he could go on "forever" in his argument opposing bail.
Intention
Earlier, Roux said Pistorius's alleged intention to kill a
burglar could not be turned into an intention to kill his girlfriend.
"The question here is how would a reasonable person
have acted under the circumstances?"
Nair asked what charge Roux would ask for if an intruder
behind the toilet door had posed a threat.
"We would ask for culpable homicide," replied
Roux.
State prosecutor Gerrie Nel has argued that Pistorius had
intended to kill when he fired his weapon, even if he thought he was shooting
at a burglar.
- See News24's Pistorius Special Report .
- Live updates .
- SAPA