Protestor proclaims Okah's innocence
2013-03-18 18:02
-
Johannesburg
Johannesburg: The elusive metropolis is a pioneering effort to insert South Africa's largest city...
Now R225.00
buy now
Johannesburg - Nigerian Henry Okah is not a terrorist and
South Africa prosecuted an innocent man, a protester said outside the South
Gauteng High Court in Johannesburg on Monday.
"Mr Henry Okah is a freedom fighter. He is not a
terrorist," prison rights activist Golden Miles Bhudu said outside court.
"My brothers and sisters wake up and smell the
coffee; an innocent man has been prosecuted. Mr Henry Okah is not a bloody
terrorist."
Dressed in orange prison overalls with chains wrapped
around him, Bhudu had two posters in his hands.
"Henry Okah is a political detainee and not a
terrorist, says Sapohr" and "Henry Okah's trial re-enacts Rivonia
trial of 1964, says Sapohr," the placards read.
Sapohr is the SA Prisoners' Organisation for Human
Rights.
Bhudu arrived at the court early in the morning and
started to protest, drawing a crowd during lunch.
He told those gathering around him that South Africa
should not have become involved in the case.
"South Africa must get out of this whole thing.
South Africa must clean their own house. South Africa is not the policeman of
Africa. Okah is and was fighting for the emancipation of his people. South
Africa had no right to charge him."
South Africa tried Okah as part of its international
obligation, as the Nigerian authorities had not applied for his extradition,
according to the prosecution.
On 21 January, Okah was found guilty on 13 counts of
terrorism, including engaging in terrorist activities, conspiracy to engage in
terrorist activities, and delivering, placing, and detonating an explosive
device.
The charges related to two car bombs in Abuja, Nigeria,
in which 12 people were killed and 36 injured on 1 October 2010, the anniversary
of the country's independence.
In his judgment Judge Neels Claassen said the State had
proved Okah's guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and that his failure to testify
meant the evidence against him remained uncontested.
- SAPA