DA welcomes 'unusual' SCA ruling on Zuma charges

2016-10-12 14:10
DA leader Mmusi Maimane (Amanda Khoza, News24)

DA leader Mmusi Maimane (Amanda Khoza, News24)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Bloemfontein - The Democratic Alliance on Wednesday welcomed the SCA’s “unusual decision” to allow President Jacob Zuma to argue why he should be granted leave to appeal against the decision to reinstate his corruption charges.

The party was confident the Supreme Court of Appeal would deny Zuma leave to appeal once it had heard oral arguments, DA leader Mmusi Maimane said in a statement.  

“It would be in the interests of justice for President Zuma and the National Prosecuting Authority to drop their spurious appeals, accept the judgment of the High Court, and face the corruption charges that he has tried to avoid for so long.”

In an order handed down on Tuesday, October 11, the SCA said Zuma’s lawyers would have to argue why he should be granted leave to appeal against the High Court’s ruling.

"The application for leave to appeal is referred for oral argument in terms of 17(2) of the Superior Courts Act 10 of 2013. The parties must be prepared, if called upon to do so, to address the court on the merits," the court said.


Zuma’s lawyers have one month to file additional copies of the application for leave to appeal, and three months to file the record of the High Court’s proceedings.

The Constitutional Court said in an order dated September 28, that it would not hear the NPA’s appeal against the High Court ruling at present. This was because of the pending SCA matter.

NPA spokesperson Luvuyo Mfaku said on Friday that the Constitutional Court’s order did not reflect the merits of the appeal.

"It is clear that the Constitutional Court was mindful of the pending petition to the president of the Supreme Court of Appeal," he said in a statement.

On April 29, a full bench of the High Court in Pretoria overturned the NPA’s decision to drop 783 corruption charges against Zuma. It ordered that the charges be reinstated. In June, the high court denied the NPA leave to appeal.

On April 6 2009, then-NPA head Mokotedi said transcripts of telephone conversations between then-Scorpions boss Leonard McCarthy and former NPA boss Bulelani Ngcuka showed political interference in the decision to charge Zuma.

The charges were withdrawn in the High Court in Durban on April 7 2009.

Here's the full judgment:

WATCH this video:

Read more on:    da  |  npa  |  jacob zuma  |  spy tapes  |  judiciary  |  politics

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

Inside News24

Financial advisors – Do you need one and should you get one?

The good, the bad, and everything else you need to know when considering hiring a financial advisor.


Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.