ICC exit disregards rule of law - Freedom Under Law

2016-10-21 20:19
(iStock)

(iStock)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Johannesburg – The South African government’s decision to exit the ICC shows it is increasingly contemptuous of, and brazen in its disregard for, the rule of law, Freedom Under Law said on Friday.

“There can be no lawful purported withdrawal from the Rome Statute of the ICC, while the Implementation Act is in force,” executive officer at Freedom Under Law, Nicole Fritz, said in a statement.

The act ensures implementation of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in South Africa, and provides for South Africa to prosecute people accused of committing war crimes, genocide, or crimes against humanity within and outside the country’s borders. It is intended to ensure that South Africa arrests such people and hands them over to the ICC, and that it co-operates with the court.

Fritz said it was not merely an international treaty, but South Africa’s own democratically-enacted law: the Implementation of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Act 27 of 2002.

Justice Minister Michael Masutha said on Friday that the government's reason for removing itself as a signatory to the Rome Statute was due to a conflict between its obligations to the African Union to grant its heads of state immunity, and its obligations to the ICC.

In June last year, the High Court in Pretoria ordered the government to arrest Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir while he was in the country for a two-day AU summit.

The ICC had issued warrants for his arrest, to put him on trial on charges of war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity committed in his country.

The court said the government’s failure to arrest him was unconstitutional. Al-Bashir was allowed to leave the country before the order was handed down.

Masutha said South Africa had notified the United Nations of its intention and would have to wait for a year before the withdrawal took effect.

South Africa was the second African country to withdraw this week, following Burundi.

Fritz said International Relations Minister Maite Nkoana-Mashabane acted unlawfully and unconstitutionally in notifying the United Nations of South Africa’s intention to withdraw from the ICC.

She said in March this year, the Supreme Court of Appeal made clear the obligations South Africa had assumed in adopting the Implementation Act. The law kept South Africa at the vanguard of attempts to prevent international crimes, the court said.


Read more on:    anc  |  icc  |  omar al bashir

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.
NEXT ON NEWS24X

Inside News24

 
PARTNER CONTENT
INFOGRAPHIC: New thinking required for retirement

Everything we believe about retirement is fast becoming outdated.

/News

Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.