ICC laws inconsistent with ours - SA government

2016-10-21 14:04
(iStock)

(iStock)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Pretoria - The South African government says a move to withdraw from the International Criminal Court and its obligations to the Rome Statute is part of ensuring that the country's international law obligations are properly aligned with domestic law.

"The implementation of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Act, 2002 is in conflict with and inconsistent with the provisions of the Diplomatic Immunities and Privileges Act of 2001," said Justice Minister Michael Masutha at a media briefing in Pretoria.

He said a bill proposing the repeal of the implementation of the Rome Statute will soon be tabled in Parliament, explaining that a letter has already been sent to the Speaker of the National Assembly and chairperson of the National Council of Provinces.

South Africa has already notified the United Nations of its intention and will have to wait for a year before its withdrawal takes effect. In this period it will be held by its obligations under the Rome Statute.

SA is the second African country to withdraw this week, following hot on the heels of Burundi.

On Wednesday President Pierre Nkurunziza confirmed that Burundi had signed legislation to make it the first country on the African continent to withdraw from the international court. Masutha said South Africa's decision had nothing to do with Burundi.

Al-Bashir ruling stands

READ: SA starts process to withdraw from International Criminal Court

"This has been in the making for a year, it's just a coincidence that it's happening in the same week," he told journalists.

Masutha also announced that government has opted to withdraw its application for leave to appeal the decision by the Supreme Court of Appeal regarding the matter of Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir, stating that the ruling stands.

Masutha, however, had no answers on the way forward in terms of consequences for those found responsible for allowing al-Bashir to leave SA, in spite of a court order barring his exit from the country.

Masutha said there was uncertainty around customary international law in relation to diplomatic immunity versus those who were wanted for serious violations of human rights.

"We don't want to be part of laws that force regime change," said Masutha.

Read more on:    un  |  icc  |  judiciary

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.
NEXT ON NEWS24X

Inside News24

 
PARTNER CONTENT
INFOGRAPHIC: New thinking required for retirement

Everything we believe about retirement is fast becoming outdated.

/News

Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.