No settlement in Nkandla Concourt matter

2016-02-05 15:16
(Amanda Khoza, News24)

(Amanda Khoza, News24)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Johannesburg - Parties involved in the Constitutional Court matter regarding President Jacob Zuma's Nkandla home have not reached a settlement.

The court had given them until 16:00 on Friday to respond to a settlement proposed by Zuma.

The EFF and DA were due to argue in the Constitutional Court next Tuesday that Zuma needed to comply with Public Protector Thuli Madonsela’s recommendations and repay a reasonable percentage of the R246m spent on renovations to his Nkandla homestead.

The EFF had proposed its own order which it wanted the Constitutional Court to hand down.

The party wanted the court to confirm that the public protector's power to take remedial action included the power to issue directions binding on organs of state, according to a copy of the order.

It wanted directions given in her March 2014 report, "Secure in Comfort", to remain binding on Zuma.

This included paying a reasonable percentage of the cost of non-security upgrades.

The EFF wanted the Constitutional Court to find that Zuma failed to implement the directions in breach of his oath of office and his constitutional duties.

On Tuesday, Zuma sent a letter to the court's registrar to suggest that it order the auditor general and finance minister to determine how much he should repay for non-security features at Nkandla.

Appointed official

In its order, the EFF wanted the official appointed to determine the amount Zuma had to repay, to make a determination within 60 days of the date of the order, and for Zuma to pay within 30 days after this.

The EFF wanted Zuma and National Assembly Speaker Baleka Mbete, the first respondent in the matter, to pay the party's legal costs.

The DA said it would not accept Zuma's proposed settlement and wanted the matter heard in court.

The public protector's lawyers said she wanted to present argument to the court on the nature and ambit of her powers and the legal effect of her remedial action.

Madonsela stood by the remedial action set out in her report. She however agreed that it was no longer appropriate for the police to help determine the reasonable costs of non-security features.

Read more on:    da  |  anc  |  eff  |  jacob zuma  |  nkandla upgrade  |  politics

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.
NEXT ON NEWS24X

Inside News24

 
PARTNER CONTENT
INFOGRAPHIC: New thinking required for retirement

Everything we believe about retirement is fast becoming outdated.

/News

Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.