Rival airlines agree to remove dispute from court roll

2016-05-24 11:53
(Fly Go Air, Facebook)

(Fly Go Air, Facebook)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Pietermaritzburg - A high court dispute between SA Airlink airline company and their former local rival, FlyGoAir, was removed from the court roll by agreement on Monday.

SA Airlink spokesperson Karin Murray, however, said that although the matter was removed from the court roll yesterday “pending an out-of-court settlement between the parties”, the matter has not been withdrawn.

This is contrary to a comment by FlyGoAir CEO Reg Sivsanker, who said both parties decided to “walk away” and put the case to bed as they did not have the energy to continue fighting over “petty stuff”.

“We both have airlines to run,” Sivsanker told The Witness in response to a telephonic inquiry as to the reason why the matter was removed from the court roll yesterday.

He said some of the factors that led to a settlement include the fact that police did not follow through with investigations into criminal charges that were opened in relation to the matter and that airport security footage had gone missing.

“… This is a small industry and we need to work together with each other rather than against one another. This whole matter was blown up out of proportion,” he added.

The high court application was originally launched by SA Airlink in 2015, when the airline approached the high court for an urgent order to force FlyGoAir to retract “false and unsubstantiated” claims on social media and in the print media.

In the claims they accused SA Airlink staff of tampering with their computers, embarking on industrial espionage and indulging in alleged anti-competitive behaviour.

In replying court documents at the time, Sivsanker alleged there were cogent reasons at the time for accusing SA Airlink of tampering with booking systems in a bid to prevent FlyGoAir’s business taking off. These allegations were all denied by SA Airlink.

Judge Sharmain Balton ordered the case to be referred for oral evidence due to the massive dispute of facts in the court documents and the matter was set down for trial in the Pietermaritzburg high court from Monday.

However, when it came before KZN Judge President Achmat Jappie he was told the matter was settled. The file recorded that the matter was removed from the court roll by agreement.

Read more on:    pietermaritzburg

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

Inside News24

Financial advisors – Do you need one and should you get one?

The good, the bad, and everything else you need to know when considering hiring a financial advisor.


Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.