'Oral sex can save lives'
2002-06-13 20:37
Cape Town - As an alternative to riskier sexual practices, oral sex could prevent thousands of young South Africans from dying of Aids, loveLife's CEO David Harrison said on Thursday.
He was reacting to deputy president Jacob Zuma's statement in
parliament this week that oral sex was "wrong" and "unnatural".
Zuma in turn was commenting on loveLife material advising that
young people "could also try oral sex, which is sucking, licking
and kissing a person's genitals".
Harrison said the material, carried under the TethaNathi logo in daily newspapers, was an attempt to encourage young people who were already sexually active to stop having penetrative sex.
Half of all South Africans had had full penetrative sex by the
time they were 16 years old, he said.
"And this is driving the HIV epidemic. This is what is causing
literally thousands of lives to be lost.
"If we can stop young people having penetrative sex - even if
we can't turn them into saints - we will change the course of this epidemic."
He said loveLife was a public health organisation, drawing on
the best epidemiological evidence to determine what was going to
change the course of the Aids epidemic, and conveying that to young people.
"We try to make them aware of the risks of certain forms of
sexual behaviour," Harrison said. "If we can move them from high risk to medium or lower risk sexual behaviour, we are going to save a lot of lives."
LoveLife made it clear there were significant risks of HIV
transmission associated with oral sex.
"But hey, at the end of the day if young people have to choose
between oral sex and full unprotected penetrative sex, oral sex is most likely going to save their lives."
Harrison said there was a place for moral judgements and
confirmation of societal values, but this was the role of
faith-based organisations, politicians and sectors of society
playing a different role to loveLife.
LoveLife's task was to outline to young people what choices they had and the health risks associated with those choices, not to make choices for them.
Their decisions would be determined by the values inculcated
through their families and influences such as faith-based
organisations.
Harrison added that Zuma's high-profile involvement in
loveLife's current national campaign to get parents to talk openly to their children about sex had had a major impact.
He knew this partly from an anecdotal level, but also from
formal research, which showed a "high degree of association" by
parents with the campaign's message.
He said that while the TethaNathi material was loveLife's, a
teachers' "manual" that African Christian Democratic Party MP
Cheryllyn Dudley also read from in parliament when she challenged
Zuma on oral sex, was not.
Dudley said the manual was "essential for children by at least Grade Six to have a clear understanding of the exact mechanics of how to give a female an orgasm, including how a
female or a male can give a woman oral sex".
LoveLife describes itself as a "lifestyle brand" for young South
Africans, promoting healthy living and positive sexuality.
Its programmes are implemented by a consortium of non-government
organisations, and funded largely by the Kaiser and Gates
foundations.
- SAPA